디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제18권3호
  • /
  • Pages.99-110
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기업조직 구성원의 기업가정신과 개인 및 집단 창의성 관계에서 조직학습지향성의 매개효과에 관한 연구

A Study on the Mediating Effects of Organizational Learning Orientation on the Relationship between Entrepreneurship of Corporate Members and Individual and Group Creativity

  • 송찬섭 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 노연숙 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 이다정 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 이선규 (금오공과대학교 경영학과)
  • Song, Chan-Sub (Consulting School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Noh, Youn-Sook (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Da-Jung (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Kyu (Department of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2019.12.18
  • 심사 : 2020.03.20
  • 발행 : 2020.03.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 기업조직 구성원의 기업가정신과 조직학습지향성, 개인창의성, 집단창의성의 관계를 실증분석하고, 그 효과를 확인함으로써, 조직차원에서 기업가정신과 창의성의 관계를 다루었다. 특히 기업가정신과 창의성의 관계에 있어서, 조직학습지향성의 매개효과 분석에 초점을 두고 있다. 문헌연구를 바탕으로 기업가정신과 개인 및 집단 창의성, 조직학습지향성의 관계를 설명함으로써 연구모형 및 가설을 설정하였다. 경북의 제조업 종사자를 대상으로 308부의 설문지를 배포·회수하여 구조방정식을 통한 실증분석을 시행하였다. 연구 결과, 기업가정신은 개인·집단창의성에 유의한 영향을 직접적으로 미치지 않고 조직학습지향성을 매개하여 영향을 주는 것이 확인되었다. 그리고 기업가정신이 조직학습지향성에 미치는 영향과 조직학습지향성이 개인·집단창의성에 미치는 영향을 확인하였다. 이러한 연구결과는 조직 차원에서 기업가정신과 조직학습지향성 효과를 파악함으로써 문화적 측면에서 조직 관리를 위한 방향성을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.

This study deals with the relationship between entrepreneurship of corporate member and creativity at the organizational level by empirically analyzing the relationship between entrepreneurship, organizational learning orientation, individual creativity, and group creativity. In particular, the relationship between entrepreneurship and creativity focuses on analyzing the mediating effects of organizational learning orientation. Based on the literature research, the research model and hypothesis were established by explaining the relationship between entrepreneurship, individual and group creativity, and organizational learning orientation. 308 copies of the questionnaire were distributed and collected for manufacturing workers in Gyeongbuk, and empirical analysis was conducted through structural equations. As a result, it was confirmed that entrepreneurship has an influence on organizational learning orientation without directly affecting individual and group creativity. In addition, the effects of entrepreneurship on organizational learning orientation and organizational learning orientation on individual and group creativity were examined. These findings can provide Directions for organizational management from the cultural perspective by identifying the effects of entrepreneurship and organizational learning orientation at the organizational level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lumpkin, G. T. & Dess, G. G. (1996). Enriching the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct-A Reply to" Entrepreneurial Orientation or Pioneer Advantage". JSTOR.
  2. Zhang, H. P., Kim, J. K., Wang, H. H. & Lee, Y. K. (2018). The Effect of Intrapreneurship on the Organizational Performance: Focused on the Mediating Effects of Open Innovation -Focused on small and medium enterprises in Busan-. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(3), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.101
  3. Oly Ndubisi, N. & Iftikhar, K. (2012). Relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and performance : Comparing small and medium‐size enterprises. Journal of Research in Marketing & Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 214-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/14715201211271429
  4. Antoncic, B. & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00054-3
  5. D. D. Noh, Y. G. Cho & G. T. Cho. (2011). Development of organizational creativity level assessment model. Journal of Technology Innovation Society, 14(1), 109-138.
  6. Goodale, J. C., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S. & Covin, J. G. (2011). Operations management and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating effect of operations control on the antecedents of corporate entrepreneurial activity in relation to innovation performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.07.005
  7. Lassen, S. R., Steele, M. M. & Sailor, W. (2006). The relationship of school‐wide positive behavior support to academic achievement in an urban middle school. Psychology in the Schools, 43(6), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20177
  8. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
  9. Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E. & Noordewier, T. (1997). A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070397254003
  10. Baker, W. E. & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399274002
  11. Garvin, D. (n.d.). A.(1993). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 378-391.
  12. DiBella, A. J., Nevis, E. C. & Gould, J. M. (1996). Understanding organizational learning capability. Journal of Management Studies, 33(3), 361-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00806.x
  13. Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T. & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
  14. Hurley, R. F. & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251742
  15. H. L. Gong. (2013). The causal relationship between innovative behavior of office workers in large corporations and transformational leadership, organizational and individual learning orientation of CEO. Master dissertation. Seoul National University. Seoul
  16. H. B. Lee & S. C. Lee. (2008). A Study on Strengthening of Learning Orientation for Environmental Organizations' Environmental Responsiveness. Korean Organization Science Bulletin, 5(3), 1-27.
  17. E. A. Yea, G. H. Park & M. Y. Kim. (2008). The Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation of Textile Industry on Business Performance: Korean Journal of Clothing Industry, 10(1), 40-49.
  18. S. H. On, K. H. Park & Y. K. Choi. (2011). A Study on the Influence of Learning Organization Level on the Quality Commitment of Employees. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 24(3), 1323-1346.
  19. K. H. Kim. (2008). Causal relationship between learning orientation, learning behavior, organizational environment and learning outcomes in SMEs, Doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University. Seoul.
  20. J. H. Kim & H. S. Lee. (2010). Effects of Market Orientation of Department Stores on Job Attitude and Mediating Effect of Learning Orientation. Competency Development Learning Research, 5, 1-24.
  21. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  22. Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921
  23. Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27
  24. Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 29(3), 562-585. https://doi.org/10.5465/256224
  25. Getzels, J. W. & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. AAUP Bulletin, 48(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.2307/40223437
  26. Judgement and choice, the psychology of decision: Second edn, Robin M. Hogarth, John Wiley (July 1987), 311 pp, $\pounds$17.50 (hardback). (1988). Long Range Planning, 21(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(88)90078-7
  27. Barron, F. & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 439-476. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255
  28. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  29. Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1112-1142. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9704071865
  30. Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1081-1111. https://doi.org/10.2307/259165
  31. Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity(Vol. 87). Harvard Business School Publishing Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446213704.n2
  32. Cho, Y. H., Han, B. C., Kim, E. K., Song, C. & Lee, S. K. (2018). A Study on the Moderating Effects of Motivation in Technological Entrepreneurship, Absorption Capacity and Creative Product in the Convergence Era. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(12), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.12.243
  33. Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S. & Avolio, B. J. (1998). Transformational leadership and dimensions of creativity: Motivating idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_3
  34. Catmull, E. (2008). How Pixar fosters collective creativity. Harvard Business School Publishing Boston, MA.
  35. Stein, N. L. & Glenn, C. G. (1975). An Analysis of Story Comprehension in Elementary School Children: A Test of a Schema.
  36. Leonard-Barton, D. & Swap, W. C. (1999). When sparks fly: Igniting creativity in groups. Harvard Business School Publishing Boston, MA.
  37. King, N. & Anderson, N. (1990). Innovation in working groups.
  38. Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E. & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
  39. West, M. A. & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behaviour.
  40. Payne, H. (1990). Creative movement and dance in groupwork. Self & Society, 18(5), 16-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03060497.1990.11085107
  41. Shane, S. & Nicolaou, N. (2015). Creative personality, opportunity recognition and the tendency to start businesses: A study of their genetic predispositions. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(3), 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.04.001
  42. Ward, J. J., Sodhi, J. S., McGuffin, L. J., Buxton, B. F. & Jones, D. T. (2004). Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. Journal of Molecular Biology, 337(3), 635-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.002
  43. Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. C. (2000). The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: a balanced replication. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(98)00077-0
  44. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L. & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920-936. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400377
  45. Elliott, E. S. & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
  46. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406
  47. Covin, J. G. & Slevin, D. P. (1986). The development and testing of an organizational-level entrepreneurship scale. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1(3), 628-639.
  48. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995
  49. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effortreward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  50. Choi, J. I. (1995). A Study on Determinants of Group Creativity. Ph.D dissertation, Korea University, Seoul.
  51. H. S. Kim. (1999). Development and validation of creativity diagnostic measurement tools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(4), 269-303.
  52. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A. & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.950
  53. Amabile, T. M., Burnside, R. & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1995). User's guide for KEYS: Assessing the climate for creativity.
  54. S. H. Hong. (2000). The Criteria and Criteria for Selecting the Fit Index of Structural Equation Model. Journal of the Korean Psychological Association, 19(1), 161-177.
  55. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press.
  56. Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
  57. Han, B., Cho, Y., Song, C., Kim, E. & Lee, S. (2018). A study of the relationship of Entrepreneurship, Absorptive capacity and Creative product. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(10), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.10.187