DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

디지털 트랜스포메이션 시대의 언플러그드를 적용한 컴퓨팅 사고력에 대한 효과성 분석

Effectiveness Analysis of Computing Thinking with Unplugged in Digital Transformation

  • 이명숙 (계명대학교 타불라라사칼리지)
  • 투고 : 2020.01.30
  • 심사 : 2020.03.20
  • 발행 : 2020.03.28

초록

디지털 트랜스포메이션은 가상과 현실간의 상호작용을 혁신하는 것이다. 이 과정에서 발생하는 복잡한 문제를 해결해야 하고, 그 방법 중 하나가 컴퓨팅 사고력이다. 따라서 본 연구는 대학에서 교양교육으로 언플러그드를 이용한 소프트웨어 교육이 컴퓨팅 사고력을 향상시키는데 효과가 있는지 살펴보는 것을 목표로 한다. 그 방법으로 전체 학년을 대상으로 한 교양 소프트웨어 수업에 컴퓨팅 사고 5개 요소를 추출한 후 언플러그드를 적용하여 수업을 진행하였다. 한 학기 16차시 수업을 진행하였고 설문지를 통해 컴퓨터 사고력 향상을 측정하였다. 그 결과 수업 이후 수강생의 컴퓨팅 사고력이 전반적으로 증가하였다. 관찰조사에서는 전 학문분야에서 컴퓨팅 사고력 요소 중 추상화 요소를 개념화하는데 어려움을 느꼈으며, 예·체능은 알고리즘 요소를, 인문학은 패턴인식 요소를 개념화하는데 더 어려움을 느꼈다. 향후 각 요소를 학문영역별로 다양한 내용의 콘텐츠를 개발하여 학습자에게 이해를 돕는 것이 필요하다.

Digital transformation is about revolutionizing the interaction between virtual and reality. The complex problems that arise in this process must be solved, and one of the methods is computing thinking. Therefore, this study aims to observe whether software education that uses unplugged as liberal education is effective in enhancing computing thinking. For this, 5 elements of computing thinking were extracted and unplugged was applied to liberal software classes, and classes were conducted. During one semester, 16 sessions of classes were conducted and computing thinking enhancement was measured through surveys. As a result, the computing thinking of the students increased overall after classes. Observation surveys showed that, among computing thinking elements, students of all academic fields felt difficulties conceptualizing abstraction elements, those of arts and physical education felt more difficulties with algorithm elements, and those of the humanities felt more difficulties with pattern recognition elements. In the future, various contents for each element should be developed by academic field to aid learner understanding.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. IT TREND, https://blog.his21.co.kr/302.
  2. Resnick, M. (2002). Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age. In The Global Information Technology Report: Readiness for the Networked World, edited by G. Kirkman. Oxford University Press.
  3. EduWang, https://eduwang2013.blog.me/221774114289
  4. Education Department. (2018). 2015 Revised National Curriculum.
  5. J. H. Chun & J. Y. Yoo. (2014). Trials and effects of a learner-centered creative training technique on undergraduate education of medical record information management. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(3), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.3.277
  6. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12: Review of the State of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
  7. M. S. Lee. (2017). A Study on Creative and Convergent SW Education Programs for improving Computational Thinking. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 22(7), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2017.22.07.093
  8. Y. J. Lee. etc. (2014). Research for Introducing Computational Thinking into Primary and Secondary Education. KOFAC Report.
  9. S. J. Lee. (2018). A Study on Designing a Class of Convergence Thinking based on Computational Thinking. The Journal of Korean Society of Science & Art, 36, 255-263. DOI : 10.17548/ksaf.2018.12.30. 255.
  10. J. H. Ku. (2017). Designing an App Inventor Curriculum for Computational Thinking based Non-majors Software Education. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 7(1), 61-66. DOI: 10.22156/CS4SMB.2017.7.1.061
  11. H. S. Han, S. K. Han. (2009). A Case Study on Information Education for Pre-Service Teacher using Unplugged Computing, Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 13(1), 23-30.
  12. J. M. Wing. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  13. J. M. Wing. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366, 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
  14. K. S. Oh. (2016). A study on the contents of computational thinking for programming education.Ph.D. dissertation. Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul.
  15. J. S. Kim. (2015). SW Education Teaching and Learning Model Development. KERIS Report, CR2015-35.
  16. Software Education Blog, https://m.blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=gi_sik_in&logNo=220238605443&proxyReferer=https%3A%2F%2F.
  17. M. S. Lee. (2016), Hybrid teaching method using MOOC in liberal arts education. Korea National Institute for General Education Report, RR-2016-14- 633.
  18. Y. S. Han. (2018), Effectiveness of problem-based learning based programming education : Focus on Computational Thinking, Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities and Sociology, 8(7), 433-445, DOI: 10.21742/AJMA HS.2018.07.74