DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Computer Attitude on Critical Thinking Disposition

  • Kim, Jung Ae (Department of Nursing, Chodang University) ;
  • Kim, Ju Ok (Department of Nursing, Chodang University)
  • Received : 2020.01.30
  • Accepted : 2020.02.10
  • Published : 2020.03.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of computer attitudes such as anxiety, confidence, preference, usefulness, and computer literacy on their critical thinking ability, targeting college students at unspecified university universities. The period of data collection was from January 10, 2020 to January 17, 2020. A total of 213 people participated in the study. For data analysis, SPSS 18.0 was used for frequency analysis, Pearson correlation, x2 square, and simple regression analysis. As a result of the analysis, the difference of interests under the statistical significance level among general characteristics was Gender (x2=55.7***, p<0.001), Age (x2=407.5***, p<0.001), Resident (x2=127.5***, p<0.001) Family (x2=289.4***, p<0.001). In the simple regression analysis, computer liking (t=2.102, p<0.05) and computer use ability affected Truth seeking (t=-6.319, p<0.01), computer use ability was affecting analyticity (t=-5.630, p<0.01), computer use ability was affecting systematicity (t=-2.545, p<0.05), computer use ability was affecting maturity under statistical significance (t=-2.583, p<0.05). In conclusion, this study suggests that computer liking and computer use ability affect the sub-factor components of critical thinking disposition, truth seeking, analyticity, systematicity, and maturity, therefore the emphasis of this study is to emphasize that it is desirable to use the computer as a medium of learning based on computer literacy rather than worrying about excessive computer use.

Keywords

References

  1. EM, Sung, Korea Internet &Security Agency, 2009.
  2. SS Suh, YJ Yang, KS Min, SA Park, A study on the Development of diagnosis Scale for Adverse Effects of New, Trendy ICT in the Education, Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 503-531, 2015. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.31.3.503
  3. JS Kim, SM Choi, JK Gang, A Survey on the Use of Computers by Youth: PC addiction in teens. Seoul: Korea Youth Counselor, 2000.
  4. EM Im, SY Lee, Adolescents' Computer / Internet Use and Parent-Child Conflict, Educational Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 243-258, 2002.
  5. Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. The labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence. Justice Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 359-394, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828900090261
  6. Triplett, R. The conflict perspective, symbolic interactionism, and the status characteristics hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, Vol. 10, pp. 540-558, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829300092011
  7. SS Lee, Influence of juvenile mal behavior and informal stigma: analysis of juvenile panel data, Criminal Policy Studies, Vol. 71, pp. 1105-1127, 2007.
  8. MA Nam, Factors Affecting Informal Perception of Adolescents in Justice Process, Youth Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 201-232, 2007.
  9. HS Kim, HJ Park, JH Seo. The Impact of Student's Use of ICT on Academic Achievement: Focusing on PISA 2006 Korean Data, Korean education, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp.107-129, 2008.
  10. DI Kim, JH Shin, BS Ko, BG Gae, HS Kim, The Research on factors influencing Academic Achievements in e- Learning Environments, Asian Journal of education, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2006.
  11. G Huh, Comparative Study of Korea-Japan Relations on the Structure of Mathematics Academic Influence Impacts Using TIMSS, Northeast Asian Culture Research, Vol. 31, pp. 5-19, 2012.
  12. Li, N., & Kirkup, G. Gender and cultural differences in internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 301-317, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007
  13. Sung, E. M, & Mayer, R. E. Online multimedia learning with mobile devices and desktop computers: An experimental test of Clark's methods-not-media hypothesis. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 639-647, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.022
  14. MO Geon, GA Yang, Effects of Computer-Based Drawing Activity on Hyperactivity of ADHD Children, Journal of Emotional & Behavioral disorder, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 219-240, 2008.
  15. JY Ju, JH Kim, The Effects of Class Control Methods, Learners' Perception, and Computer Ability on Academic Achievement and Satisfaction in ICT-Used Classes, Korean Society for Elementary Education, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 145-172, 2006.
  16. Newby, M., & Fisher. D., Development and use of the computer laboratory environment inventory, Paper presented at the annual meeting of Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, 1997.
  17. BG Son, SW Choi, JS Song, SM Jeong, '98 Education Information Project Evaluation (RR 98-1), Seoul: Multimedia Education Support Center, 1998.
  18. KH Jeong, SJ Lee, MJ Gang, A Study on Educational Information Policy for Improving Quality of Life(NCA-VRER-97093, 1997.
  19. Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. P. The effect of sex, age, and computer experience on computer attitude, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED246878, 1984.
  20. Ennis RH, Critical thinking : What is it? Philosophy of Education, pp. 76-78, 1992.
  21. Facione A. Critical thinking : a statement of expert for purpose of educational assessment and instruction, American philosophical association delphi report, 1990.