International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Evaluation Criteria for the Forest Garden

  • Received : 2020.01.11
  • Accepted : 2020.02.14
  • Published : 2020.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Development of forest garden for city dwellers utilizing green space within urban area is nowadays highly regarded as a means to invigorate city and to raise living standard for city dwellers. Thus, development of forest garden has become pressing and important agenda for city governments. Promoting forest garden to solve many environmental and social issues city governments face today requires evaluation criteria to determine whether target green space is suitable to serve as forest garden. In this respect, we believe that evaluation of values of forest garden from previous studies can serve as foundation for developing evaluation index for forest garden. Thus, we aimed to develop evaluation criteria for values of forest garden. First, various evaluation criteria collected from previous studies were assessed by expert groups. Then, the result was studied through AHP technique and we developed evaluation criteria for forest garden based on such result. Especially, evaluation criteria were divided into main and sub-levels for more detailed and precise evaluation system.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Forest Service, "Statistics of Urban Forest". Korea Forest Service, 2016
  2. Ministry of Cultures, Sports and Tourism, "2016 Survey on National Leisure Activity". Ministry of Cultures, Sports and Tourism, 2016
  3. W. Byun, J. Lee, E. Seo, Y. Hong and T. Kim, "A study on urban resident's preference for developing urban recreational forest": The case study on Seoul, Daegu/Gyungbuk, Gyunggido, Korean Institute of Forest Recreation and Welfare, Vol. 7, No. 2, 19-25, 2003
  4. K.P. Hong and H.J. LEE, Defining a Concept of Forest Garden through Understanding Values of Forest and Garden, The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, Vol. 6(1), 171-178, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2020.6.1.171
  5. Thomas L. Saaty, Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of operational research, Vol. 74(3), 426-447, 1994, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4
  6. H.J. Jun, and H.J. Cho, (2005). A Study on the Design Priority Analysis of Design Factors of Apartment Facade using AHP. Journal of Korea Institute of Architecture, 21(7), 49-56.
  7. J.H. LEE and S.H. CHO, An Importance Analysis on the Problem of Design Competition of Landscape Architecture, Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, Vol. 41, No. 6, 62-71, 2013 https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.6.062
  8. J.H. Suh and H.S. Yang, A Study on Framing Techniques of Landscape Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process-The Assessment on the Landscape Control Points-Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, Vol. 32, No. 4, 94-104, 2004
  9. C.G. Yoo, K.H. Byun, and S.J. Cho, (2014). Defining a Village-Focused Green Index and Evaluating Value Structures using AHP. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 16(2), 41-48.
  10. S.W. Cheong, J.H. Lee, and H.S. Je, (2007). A Study on the Sustainable Residential Quality Index of Super High-Rise Apartment Housing through Survey with Practicing Professionals. Journal of Korea Institute of Architecture, 23(11), 11-18.
  11. UNEP/CBD 2001
  12. FAO 2006
  13. Marrakech Accords Decision 11/CP.7, Annex 1(a)
  14. Korea national arboretum, "Forest Landscape Resource Evaluation Index", 2004
  15. Korea Forest Service, "Indicators for the selection of local scenic forests", 2004
  16. Korea Forest Service, "Selection Indicators of Forest Landscape Area", 2008
  17. Ministry of agriculture, food and rural affairs, "Indicators for Evaluating Rural Area", 2007
  18. M.H. Kang and S.I. Kim, Development of Evaluation Indices for Forest Landscape Classification, Journal of Korean society of forest source, Vol. 99(6), 777-784, 2010
  19. I.J. Song, C.R. Yoon, Development and application of biodiversity indicator in parks and green spaces in Seoul, The Seoul institute, URBIO Index, 2016
  20. M.J. Kim, Y.K. Shin, H.D. Yun, J.H. Lee, N.H. Choi, B.H. Han, J.W. Choi, J.Y.Kim, J.G. Kwak, S,C. and Park, M.J. Park, Study on Development and Application of City Ecological Soundness Index (CESI), National Institute of Environmental Research, 2016
  21. Korea Forest Service, "Development and monitoring of green health assessment indicators", 2007
  22. Korea Forest Service, " The elements of sustainability in urban forestry", 2011
  23. SEBI, "Streamlining European Biodiversity Indicators", 2010
  24. City of Los Angeles, "Biodiversity Assessment Index"