정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제24권5호
  • /
  • Pages.511-518
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SW교육 학습자 중심 평가 사례 분석을 통한 인공지능교육의 평가 방향 고찰

A Study on the Evaluation Direction of AI Education through the Analysis of SW Education Learner-centered Assessment Cases

  • 투고 : 2020.09.27
  • 심사 : 2020.10.30
  • 발행 : 2020.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

4차 산업혁명과 코로나-19를 대비하면서 우리 교육은 소프트웨어 교육을 넘어 소프트웨어 기술을 접목한 AI 교육의 시대로 새로운 배움의 장을 넓혀가고 있다. 본 연구에서는 소프트웨어 교육에서의 학습자 중심 평가 사례를 분석하여 그 효과성을 통해 인공지능 교육의 평가 방향을 고찰해 보려 한다. 컴퓨터 교과를 포함한 비컴퓨터 교과에 학습자 중심 평가를 적용한 사례를 통해 학습자의 학습에 미치는 효과와 학습자 중심 평가의 환경 여건 및 평가 모형 등을 모색하고, 소프트웨어 교육에 학습자 중심 평가 모형을 적용한 사례를 통해 인공지능 교육에서 학습자 중심 평가가 교육 현장에 시사하는 점에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 분석한 결과 학습자 중심 평가는 학습자의 학습 목표 도달에 유의미한 효과를 보였으며, 지능정보기술에 따른 디지털 환경 여건의 구축, 학습자의 평가를 도울 수 있는 객관적 평가 시스템과 객관적 평가 모형이 고안되어질 때 인공지능 교육에서의 학습자 중심평가가 원활하게 이루어질 것이라고 기대한다.

Preparing for the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Corona-19, our education is expanding a new chapter of learning to the era of AI education that incorporates software technology beyond software education. In this study, we will analyze the case of learner-centered assessment in software education and examine the assessment direction of artificial intelligence education through its effectiveness. Through the case of applying learner-centered assessment to non-computer subjects including computer subjects, we sought the effects on learners' learning, environmental conditions and assessment models of learner-centered evaluation, and through the case of applying the learner-centered assessment model to software education, we wanted to find out what the learner-centered assessment in artificial intelligence education suggests to the educational site. According to the analysis, the learner-centered assessment had a significant effect on the learner's achievement goal, and it is expected that the learner-centered assessment in artificial intelligence education will be carried out smoothly when an objective evaluation system and objective evaluation model are designed to help the learner's assessment, building digital environment conditions based on intelligent information technology.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Joint association of related ministries(2020). Government Innovation Comprehensive Plan.
  2. The Department of Education(2015). Operating Guidelines for Software Training.
  3. The Department of Education(2020). Artificial Intelligence (AI) meets education, opens up educational reality.
  4. Korea Educational Development Institute(2016). Research data CRM 2016-184-01, Trends in Overseas Education.
  5. Woolf, B. P., Lane, H. C., Chaudhri, V. K., & Kolodner, J. L. (2013). AI Grand Challenges for Education. AI Magazine, 34(4), 9.
  6. Sookyoung Choi, A Study on Teaching learning for Enhancing Computational Thinking Skill in terms of Problem Solving, The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 19(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2016.19.1.006
  7. Ju, K.S(2003). A Comparative Study on the Effects of Reverse Flow on the Evaluation Method in English Speech Performance Evaluation for Second-grade Middle School.
  8. Kim, J.H.(2003). The Effects of Self and Peer Assessment on the Self-Efficacy and Learning Attitude, Gongju National University of Education.
  9. Bae Y.J(2009). The Effect of Classes Introducing Self-Evaluation and Peer-Evaluation on Academic Achievement and Mathematical Attitudes.
  10. Youn, H.K(2009). Feasibility and student satisfaction of self-evaluation and peer evaluation as a method of performance evaluation for high school physical education classes.
  11. Youn, K.J(2018). Effects of Student-led Differentiated Assessment on Self-Regulated Learning and School Happiness in Elementary School Students, Han Nam University.
  12. Jeon, J.H(2011). Effects of Peer Evaluation on Academic Achievement and Self-efficacy in Computer Practical Classes Conducted by Peer-to-peer Teaching Methods, Korea University.
  13. Ahn, S.H, Ju, G.H, Kim, Y.C and Lee, J.W(2017). Development of Compute Thinking Evaluation Mode, Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity, Policy research, BD18010002.
  14. Seo, Y.S(2016). Establishment of agenda for revision of digital textbooks according to 2015 revised curriculum, Korea Institute of Education and Academic Information
  15. Sung, J.H and Ahn, S.H (2019). Analysis on the Effectiveness of Learner-centered Evaluation in Software Education, The Journal of the Creative Information Culture of Korea, 5(2), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.32823/jcic.5.2.201908.165
  16. Cheon, J.H(2020). The Effect of Software Education Using Student-Centered Assessment on the Improvement of Creative Problem Solving Skills, Ma. D. dissertation, Gyeongin National University of Education, Incheon.