PNF and Movement

  • 제18권3호
  • /
  • Pages.315-321
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2508-6227(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-6472(eISSN)
대한고유수용성신경근촉진법학회 (Korea Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Trunk Inclination Angles on Trunk Muscle Activity and Subjective Difficulties During Supine Bridge Exercise with a Suspension Device

  • Kim, Jwa-Jun (Department of Physical Therapy, Choonhae College of Health Sciences) ;
  • Park, Se-Yeon (Department of Physical Therapy, Kaya University)
  • 투고 : 2020.04.19
  • 심사 : 2020.05.13
  • 발행 : 2020.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Recent studies have indicated that applying different inclination angles and suspension devices could be a useful way of performing exercises that include the co-activation of the trunk muscles. Present study was to examine the influences of changes in the inclination angle during trunk muscle activity while engaging in a bridge exercise with a suspension device. Methods: 18 healthy, physically active male volunteers completed three trunk inclination angles (15°, 30°, and 45°) for bridge exercise variations. The surface electromyography responses of the rectus abdominis, internal oblique (IO), erector spinae (ES), and rectus femoris (RF), as well as the subjective difficulty (Borg RPE score), were investigated during these bridge exercises. Results: The bridge with a 45° inclination angle suspension significantly increased the muscular activities of the RA and RF and increased the Borg RPE scores (p<0.05). The bridge with a 15° suspension significantly elevated the ES activities when compared to the other conditions. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that a higher inclination angle could not activate the overall trunk muscles during the bridge exercise. The RA and RF produced greater activation during the bridge exercise with the higher inclination angle. On the other hand, the activities of the erector spine were greater during the bridge exercise with the lower inclination angle. The present study suggests that applying a low trunk inclination angle for the supine bridge exercise is suitable for activating the erector spine muscles.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Atkins SJ, Bentley I, Brooks D, et al. Electromyographic response of global abdominal stabilizers in response to stable- and unstable-base isometric exercise. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2015;29(6):1609-1615. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000795
  2. Axler CT, McGill SM. Low back loads over a variety of abdominal exercises: searching for the safest abdominal challenge. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 1997;29(6):804-811. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199706000-00011
  3. Cho SH, Park SY. Immediate effects of isometric trunk stabilization exercises with suspension device on flexion extension ratio and strength in chronic low back pain patients. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2019;32(3):431-436. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-181298
  4. Choi CW, Koo JW, Jeong YG. Comparison of trunk muscle activity during modified side-bridge exercises and traditional side bridge exercise. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 2019;8:1-7. [Epub ahead of print].
  5. Choi Y, Kang H. The effects of sling exercise using vibration on trunk muscle activities of healthy adults. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2013;25(10):1291-1294. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1291
  6. Cram JR, Kasman GS, Holtz J. Introduction to surface electromyography. Gaithersburg. Aspen. 1998.
  7. Czaprowski D, Afeltowicz A, Gebicka A, et al. Abdominal muscle EMG-activity during bridge exercises on stable and unstable surfaces. Physical Therapy in Sport. 2014;15(3):162-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2013.09.003
  8. Dafkou K, Kellis E, Ellinoudis A, et al. The effect of additional external resistance on inter-set changes in abdominal muscle thickness during bridging exercise. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2020;19(1):102-111.
  9. Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Carp KC. Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2007;37(12):754-762. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2471
  10. Escamilla RF, Babb E, DeWitt R, et al. Electromyographic analysis of traditional and nontraditional abdominal exercises: implications for rehabilitation and training. Physical Therapy. 2006;86(5):656-671. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/86.5.656
  11. Escamilla RF, Lewis C, Bell D, et al. Core muscle activation during Swiss ball and traditional abdominal exercises. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2010;40(5):265-276. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2010.3073
  12. Escamilla RF, Lewis C, Pecson A, et al. Muscle activation among supine, prone, and side position exercises with and without a swiss ball. Sports Health. 2016;8(4):372-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738116653931
  13. Kim HD, Jeon DM, Bae HW, et al. Changes in activation of abdominal muscles at selected angles during trunk exercise by using ultrasonography. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015;39(6):950-956. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.950
  14. Lee D, Park J, Lee S. Effects of bridge exercise on trunk core muscle activity with respect to sling height and hip joint abduction and adduction. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2015;27(6):1997-1999. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.1997
  15. Yoon JO, Kang MH, Kim JS, et al. Effect of modified bridge exercise on trunk muscle activity in healthy adults: a cross sectional study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2018;22(2):161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.09.005
  16. Park HJ, Oh DW, Kim SY. Effects of integrating hip movements into bridge exercises on electromyographic activities of selected trunk muscles in healthy individuals. Manual Therapy. 2014;19(3):246-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.11.002
  17. Rutkowska-Kucharska A, Szpala A. The use of electromyography and magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate a core strengthening exercise programme. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. 2018;31(2):355-362. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-169780
  18. Scherr J, Wolfarth B, Christle JW, et al. Associations between Borg's rating of perceived exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2013;113(1):147-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2421-x
  19. Schoenfeld BJ, Contreras B, Tiryaki-Sonmez G, et al. An electromyographic comparison of a modified version of the plank with a long lever and posterior tilt versus the traditional plank exercise. Sports Biomechanics. 2014;13(3):296-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2014.942355