DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Risk Factors for Duodenal Stump Leakage after Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

  • Gu, Lihu (Department of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences) ;
  • Zhang, Kang (Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Ningbo University) ;
  • Shen, Zefeng (Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Wang, Xianfa (Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Zhu, Hepan (Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Pan, Junhai (Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Zhong, Xin (Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Khadaroo, Parikshit Asutosh (Department of Clinical Medicine, Monash University School of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences) ;
  • Chen, Ping (Department of General Surgery, HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.02
  • 심사 : 2020.02.07
  • 발행 : 2020.03.31

초록

Purpose: Duodenal stump leakage (DSL) is a potentially fatal complication that can occur after gastrectomy, but its underlying risk factors are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and management of DSL after laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). Materials and Methods: Relevant data were collected from several prospective databases to retrospectively analyze the data of GC patients who underwent Billroth II (B-II) or Rouxen-Y (R-Y) reconstruction after laparoscopic gastrectomy from 2 institutions (Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, and HwaMei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences). The DSL risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis regression. Results: A total of 810 patients were eligible for our analysis (426 with R-Y, 384 with B-II with Braun). Eleven patients had DSL (1.36%). Body mass index (BMI), elevated preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and unreinforced duodenal stump were the independent risk factors for DSL. DSL was diagnosed in 2-12 days, with a median of 8 days. Seven patients received conservative treatment, 3 patients received puncture treatment, and only 1 patient required reoperation. All patients recovered successfully after treatment. Conclusions: The risk factors of DSL were BMI ≥24 kg/㎡, elevated preoperative CRP level, and unreinforced duodenal stump. Nonsurgical treatments for DSL are preferred.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
  2. Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, Kurokawa Y, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, et al. D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;359:453-462. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0707035
  3. Lee CM, Park S, Park SH, Jung SW, Choe JW, Sul JY, et al. Sentinel node mapping using a fluorescent dye and visible light during laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: result of a prospective study from a single institute. Ann Surg 2017;265:766-773. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001739
  4. Jung DH, Lee Y, Kim DW, Park YS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, et al. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction is superior to laparoscopic total gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2017;31:3961-3969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5429-9
  5. Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, et al. Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019;321:1983-1992. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.5359
  6. Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Park YK, An JY, et al. Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg 2019;270:983-991. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003217
  7. Kinoshita T, Uyama I, Terashima M, Noshiro H, Nagai E, Obama K, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage II/III gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study in Japan (LOC-A Study). Ann Surg 2019;269:887-894. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002768
  8. Lee MS, Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, et al. What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer? Surg Endosc 2012;26:1539-1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2064-8
  9. Kawamura H, Ohno Y, Ichikawa N, Yoshida T, Homma S, Takahashi M, et al. Anastomotic complications after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy constructed by circular stapler ($OrVil^{TM}$) versus linear stapler (overlap method). Surg Endosc 2017;31:5175-5182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5584-z
  10. Aurello P, Sirimarco D, Magistri P, Petrucciani N, Berardi G, Amato S, et al. Management of duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2015;21:7571-7576. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7571
  11. Cozzaglio L, Giovenzana M, Biffi R, Cobianchi L, Coniglio A, Framarini M, et al. Surgical management of duodenal stump fistula after elective gastrectomy for malignancy: an Italian retrospective multicenter study. Gastric Cancer 2016;19:273-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0445-0
  12. Inokuchi M, Nakagawa M, Tanioka T, Okuno K, Gokita K, Kojima K. Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 2018;32:735-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5730-7
  13. Kim CH, Song KY, Park CH, Seo YJ, Park SM, Kim JJ. A comparison of outcomes of three reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. J Gastric Cancer 2015;15:46-52. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.1.46
  14. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 2011;14:113-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4
  15. Ri M, Hiki N, Ishizuka N, Ida S, Kumagai K, Nunobe S, et al.. Duodenal stump reinforcement might reduce both incidence and severity of duodenal stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2019;22:1053-1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00946-8
  16. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 2017;20:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4
  17. Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Kubota T, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, et al. Clinical outcomes and quality of life according to types of reconstruction following laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015;25:69-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000021
  18. Okuno K, Nakagawa M, Kojima K, Kanemoto E, Gokita K, Tanioka T, et al. Long-term functional outcomes of Roux-en-Y versus Billroth I reconstructions after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 2018;32:4465-4471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6192-2
  19. Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:439-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70070-X
  20. Ali BI, Park CH, Song KY. Outcomes of non-operative treatment for duodenal stump leakage after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 2016;16:28-33. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.28
  21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  22. Cozzaglio L, Cimino M, Mauri G, Ardito A, Pedicini V, Poretti D, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and occlusion balloon in the management of duodenal stump fistula. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:1977-1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1668-6
  23. Kang KC, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim W, Kim HH, Kim MC, et al. Comparison of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of large-scale multicenter results from Korea. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1953-1961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1493-0
  24. Paik HJ, Lee SH, Choi CI, Kim DH, Jeon TY, Kim DH, et al. Duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: risk factors, prevention, and management. Ann Surg Treat Res 2016;90:157-163. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.3.157
  25. Orsenigo E, Bissolati M, Socci C, Chiari D, Muffatti F, Nifosi J, et al. Duodenal stump fistula after gastric surgery for malignancies: a retrospective analysis of risk factors in a single centre experience. Gastric Cancer 2014;17:733-744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0327-x
  26. Ramos MF, Pereira MA, Barchi LC, Yagi OK, Dias AR, Szor DJ, et al. Duodenal fistula: the most lethal surgical complication in a case series of radical gastrectomy. Int J Surg 2018;53:366-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.082
  27. Takeuchi M, Ishii K, Seki H, Yasui N, Sakata M, Shimada A, et al. Excessive visceral fat area as a risk factor for early postoperative complications of total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 2016;16:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-016-0168-8
  28. McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg 2015;102:462-479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9697
  29. Lopez-Pastorini A, Riedel R, Koryllos A, Beckers F, Ludwig C, Stoelben E. The impact of preoperative elevated serum C-reactive protein on postoperative morbidity and mortality after anatomic resection for lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2017;109:68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.05.003
  30. Mansukhani V, Desai G, Shah R, Jagannath P. The role of preoperative C-reactive protein and procalcitonin as predictors of post-pancreaticoduodenectomy infective complications: a prospective observational study. Indian J Gastroenterol 2017;36:289-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0770-4
  31. Perry TE, Muehlschlegel JD, Liu KY, Fox AA, Collard CD, Body SC, et al. Preoperative C-reactive protein predicts long-term mortality and hospital length of stay after primary, nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesthesiology 2010;112:607-613. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181cea3b5
  32. Egenvall M, Morner M, Martling A, Gunnarsson U. Prediction of outcome after curative surgery for colorectal cancer: preoperative haemoglobin, C-reactive protein and albumin. Colorectal Dis 2018;20:26-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13807
  33. Kim EY, Yim HW, Park CH, Song KY. C-reactive protein can be an early predictor of postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2017;31:445-454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5272-4
  34. Crumley AB, McMillan DC, McKernan M, Going JJ, Shearer CJ, Stuart RC. An elevated C-reactive protein concentration, prior to surgery, predicts poor cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer 2006;94:1568-1571. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603150
  35. Johnson TV, Abbasi A, Owen-Smith A, Young A, Ogan K, Pattaras J, et al. Absolute preoperative C-reactive protein predicts metastasis and mortality in the first year following potentially curative nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2010;183:480-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.014
  36. Xu BB, Lu J, Zheng ZF, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, et al. The predictive value of the preoperative C-reactive protein-albumin ratio for early recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: using randomized phase III trial data. Gastric Cancer 2019;22:1016-1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00936-w
  37. Kim MC, Kim SY, Kim KW. Laparoscopic reinforcement suture (LARS) on staple line of duodenal stump using barbed suture in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective single arm phase II study. J Gastric Cancer 2017;17:354-362. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e40
  38. Misawa K, Yoshikawa T, Ito S, Cho H, Ito Y, Ogata T. Safety and feasibility of linear stapling device with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid sheet for duodenal closure in gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional phase II study. World J Surg 2019;43:192-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4748-x
  39. Zizzo M, Ugoletti L, Manzini L, Castro Ruiz C, Nita GE, Zanelli M, et al. Management of duodenal stump fistula after gastrectomy for malignant disease: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Surg 2019;19:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0520-x
  40. Cornejo ML, Priego P, Ramos D, Coll M, Ballestero A, Galindo J, et al. Duodenal fistula after gastrectomy: retrospective study of 13 new cases. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2016;108:20-26.
  41. Lee JY, Ryu KW, Cho SJ, Kim CG, Choi IJ, Kim MJ, et al. Endoscopic clipping of duodenal stump leakage after Billroth II gastrectomy in gastric cancer patient. J Surg Oncol 2009;100:80-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21285
  42. Schots JP, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen GA. Abdominal drainage and amylase measurement for detection of leakage after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2018;22:1163-1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3789-7

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of a high body mass index on the short-term outcomes and prognosis after radical gastrectomy vol.51, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02259-9