Imaging Science in Dentistry

Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (대한영상치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Alveolar bone thickness and fenestration of incisors in untreated Korean patients with skeletal class III malocclusion: A retrospective 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study

  • Oh, Song Hee (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Nahm, Kyung-Yen (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Hun (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Nelson, Gerald (Department of Orthodontics, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2019.09.24
  • Accepted : 2020.01.25
  • Published : 2020.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate vertical bone loss and alveolar bone thickness in the maxillary and mandibular incisors of patients with skeletal class III malocclusion. This study also aimed to evaluate the periodontal condition of class III malocclusion patients who had not undergone orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: The sample included cone-beam computed tomography scans of 24 Korean subjects (3 male and 21 female). Alveolar bone thickness (ABT), alveolar bone area (ABA), alveolar bone loss (ABL), and fenestration of the maxillary and mandibular incisors were measured using 3-dimensional imaging software. Results: All incisors displayed an ABT of less than 1.0 mm from the labial surface to root level 7 (70% of the root length). A statistically significant difference was observed between the mandibular labial and lingual ABAs and between the maxillary labial and mandibular labial ABAs. The lingual ABA of the mandibular lateral incisors was larger than that of the mandibular central incisors. ABL was severe on the labial surface. A statistically significant difference was observed between the maxillary and mandibular labial ABL values(21.8% and 34.4%, respectively). Mandibular lingual ABL (27.6%) was significantly more severe than maxillary lingual ABL (18.3%) (P<0.05). Eighty-two fenestrations were found on the labial surfaces of the incisors, while only 2 fenestrations were observed on the lingual surfaces. Fenestrations were most commonly observed at root level 6. Conclusion: Careful evaluation is needed before orthodontic treatment to avoid iatrogenic damage of periodontal support when treating patients with class III malocclusion.

Keywords

References

  1. Wennstrom JL. Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1996; 2: 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1073-8746(96)80039-9
  2. Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 95-110.
  3. Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P. Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 239-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)80006-0
  4. Vardimon AD, Oren E, Ben-Bassat Y. Cortical bone remodeling/tooth movement ratio during maxillary incisor retraction with tip versus torque movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114: 520-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70172-6
  5. Kim Y, Park JU, Kook YA. Alveolar bone loss around incisors in surgical skeletal Class III patients. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 676-82. https://doi.org/10.2319/070308-341.1
  6. Nahm KY, Kang JH, Moon SC, Choi YS, Kook YA, Kim SH, et al. Alveolar bone loss around incisors in Class I bidentoalveolar protrusion patients: a retrospective three-dimensional cone beam CT study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 481-8. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30845402
  7. Nelson PA, Artun J. Alveolar bone loss of maxillary anterior teeth in adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111: 328-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70192-6
  8. Janson G, Bombonatti R, Brandao AG, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR. Comparative radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone crest after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 157-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00392-5
  9. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. Am J Orthod 1971; 60: 505-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90116-3
  10. Nakajima K, Yamaguchi T, Maki K. Surgical orthodontic treatment for a patient with advanced periodontal disease: evaluation with electromyography and 3-dimensional conebeam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 450-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.042
  11. Lee SL, Kim HJ, Son MK, Chung CH. Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using conebeam CT. J Adv Prosthodont 2010; 2: 92-6. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.92
  12. Yagci A, Veli I, Uysal T, Ucar FI, Ozer T, Enhos S. Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.2319/040811-250.1
  13. Evangelista K, Vasconcelos Kde F, Bumann A, Hirsch E, Nitka M, Silva MA. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 133.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.021
  14. Choe HY, Park W, Jeon JK, Kim YH, Shon BW. Differences in mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness according to age in a normal skeletal group. Korean J Orthod 2007; 37: 220-30.
  15. Kim YS, Cha JY, Yu HS, Hwang CJ. Comparison of mandibular anterior alveolar bone thickness in different facial skeletal types. Korean J Orthod 2010; 40: 314-24. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2010.40.5.314
  16. Chakeres DW. Clinical significance of partial volume averaging of the temporal bone. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1984; 5: 297-302.
  17. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1088-95. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1653