치위생과학회지 (Journal of dental hygiene science)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.245-251
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1598-4478(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-7679(eISSN)
한국치위생과학회 (The Korean Society of Dental Hygiene Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the Effects of General and Pregnant Women's Dentifrices on the Removal of the Dental Plaque

  • Kim, Ye-Eun (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Ko, Seong-Eun (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Sa, Da-Eun (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Eun (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Jeon, Se-Yoon (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University) ;
  • Lim, Do-Seon (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.25
  • 심사 : 2020.12.07
  • 발행 : 2020.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: This study tries to compare and analyze the removal effect of dental plaque of general dentifrice and pregnant women's dentifrice and quantify the results to provide basic data so that consumers can make reasonable choices when purchasing dentifrice, and also increase interest in the dental plaque. Methods: After forming a dental plaque (carbohydrate porridge) on the labial surface of the bovine teeth, a disclosing agent was applied. Then the same experimenter brushed the surface of the bovine teeth using an electric toothbrush and took photographs using a DSLR camera. Thereafter, the residual amount of dental plaque was analyzed using the ImageJ program, and SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical processing. Results: The average residual amount of dental plaque using the general dentifrice was 11.71% for Perio, 9.45% for Cliden, and 8.47% for 2080, and the average residual amount for the three types was approximately 9.88%. The average residual amount of dental plaque of pregnant women's dentifrice was 13.95% for Jeninmothers, 12.53% for Tntnmoms, and 12.63% for Mommiracle, and the average residual amount of the three types was approximately 13.04%. On comparing the average residual amount of dental plaque between general and pregnant women's dentifrices, it was observed to be 3.16% higher for the latter. However, the results were not statistically significant. Conclusion: According to the research results, there was no significant difference in removal effects of general dentifrice and pregnant women's dentifrice. In addition, when a pregnant woman uses the right toothbrushing method with pregnant women's dentifrice, it can prevent or inhibit the progression of the gestational periodontal disease. Therefore, we recommend pregnant women to use pregnant women's dentifrices.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee SJ, Choi GY: A study on the oral health behavior status and oral health awareness of pregnant women -demographic socialogical variables-. J Korea Acad-Ind Cooper Soc 12: 5049-5055, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2011.12.11.5049
  2. Jang KA, Kim KO, Lee SO: Comparing oral health care awareness and practice in pregnant women with and without oral health education experience. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health 20: 169-177, 2016. https://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2016.20.2.169
  3. Park JH, Lee KS: Comparison of oral care patterns before and during the pregnancy. J Dent Hyg Sci 11: 273-278, 2011.
  4. Kang BW, Kim KS, Park MS, et al.: Preventive dentistry. Komoonsa, Seoul, pp.102-108, 2017.
  5. Shin KY, Park CW, Lee CH: Perturbation and recovery of the skin barrier function after tape stripping and sodium lauryl sulfate irritation. Korean J Dematol 38: 183-190, 2000.
  6. Fakhry-Smith S, Din C, Nathoo SA, Gaffar A: Clearance of sodium lauryl sulphate from the oral cavity. J Clin Periodontol 24: 313-317, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00763.x
  7. Herlofson BB, Barkvoll P: Sodium lauryl sulfate and recurrent aphthous ulcers. A preliminary study. Acta Odontol Scand 52: 257-259, 1994. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359409029036
  8. Elder RL: Final report on the safety assessment of sodium lauryl sulfate and ammonium lauryl sulfate. J Am Coll Toxicol 2: 127-181, 1983. https://doi.org/10.3109/10915818309142005
  9. Bashash M, Marchand M, Hu H, et al.: Prenatal fluoride exposure and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms in children at 6-12 years of age in Mexico City. Environ Int 121(Pt 1):658-666, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.017
  10. Malin AJ, Till C: Exposure to fluoridated water and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States: an ecological association. Environ Health 14: 17, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-015-0003-1
  11. Lee KY, Won BY: A study on the oral health care of pregnant women in a region. J Korean Acad Dent Hyg Educ 9: 1-14, 2009.
  12. Choi SM: The effect of several toothpastes on the sulcus bleeding index, plaque index and gingival keratinization. J Korean Dent Assoc 22: 417-422, 1984.
  13. Kim JH, Jeong SS, Choi CH, Hong SJ: Fluoride concentration of commercial dentifrices and effect of fluoride containing dentifrices on artificial enamel caries. J Korean Acad Dent Health 30: 56-66, 2006.
  14. Shim YS, Jeong MA, Jeong SH: The change of salivary and oral bacteria amount by composition of SLS contents of toothpaste. J Korea Acad-Ind Cooper Soc 11: 3341-3346, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.9.3341
  15. Jung YS, Lim SH, Oh SH, Kang KH, Koong HS, Hwang SJ: Effect of dental plaque removal and preference about D.I.Y dentifrices. J Korean Acad Dent Hyg Educ 10: 311-322, 2010.
  16. Jeong HY, Kim YS, Jeong MA: Variations of oral cavity environment according to sodium lauryl sulfate concentration of toothpaste. J Korea Contents Assoc 10: 240-248, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.8.240
  17. Jeong MA: Relationship of sodium lauryl sulfate content to the effects of dentifrice on halitosis. J Korea Acad-Ind Cooper Soc, 902-905. Retrived November 9, 2020, from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE07216856(2010).
  18. Jensen JL, Barkvoll P: Clinical implications of the dry mouth: oral mucosal diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci 842: 156-162, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09643.x
  19. Lee SJ, Choi GY: A study on the oral health status and oral health awareness of pregnant women. J Korea Acad-Ind Cooper Soc, 128-130. Retrived November 9, 2020, from http://www.dbpia.co.kr/journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE07216424(2009).
  20. Lee BB, Ha YM, Shin SH, et al.: Antimicrobial activity of test dentifrice product containing grapefruit seed extract and processed sulfur solution against oral pathogens. J Life Sci 19: 956-962, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2009.19.7.956
  21. Heo AR, Song KS, Cha EJ, Kim KA, Shon HS: Relationship of oral health status and oral health behaviors to the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) of the pregnant women. J Korea Contents Assoc 16: 81-89, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.08.081