DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of cutting and sowing seeds of native species on giant ragweed invasion and plant diversity in a field experiment

  • Byun, Chaeho (Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Andong National University) ;
  • Choi, Ho (Department of Biology Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kang, Hojeong (School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2020.10.08
  • Accepted : 2020.11.12
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

Background: Ambrosia trifida is a highly invasive annual plant, but effective control methods have not been proposed. Among various eradication methods, cutting is a simple measure to control invasive plants, and sowing seeds of native plants may effectively increase biotic resistance to invasion. In this study, we conducted a field experiment with two treatments: cutting and sowing seeds of six native or naturalized plants. Results: We found a significantly lower A. trifida abundance after cutting than in the control (77% decrease). Sowing seeds of native species did not provide any additional benefit for the control of A. trifida, but increased the importance values and diversity of other native vegetation. The abundance of A. trifida was negatively correlated with that of other plant taxa based on plant cover, biomass, and density. However, biotic resistance of sown plants was not effective to control invasion because A. trifida was so competitive. Conclusions: We concluded that cutting is an effective measure to control Ambrosia trifida while sowing seeds of native plants can increase native plant diversity.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We thank Hyona Kim, Yunjae Kim, and Chaeyoung Byun for assistance with the fieldwork. We also thank Minwoo Oh for drawing the study site map in QGIS. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2018R1C1B6005351).

References

  1. Abul-Fatih H, Bazzaz F. The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. I. Influence of species removal on the organization of the plant community. New Phytol. 1979;83(3):813-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb02312.x
  2. Abul-Fatih HA, Bazzaz FA, Hunt R. The biology of Ambrosia Trifida L. II. Growth and biomass allocation. New Phytol. 1979;83:829-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb02314.x
  3. Adomako MO, Ning L, Tang M, Du DL, van Kleunen M, Yu FH. Diversity- and density-mediated allelopathic effects of resident plant communities on invasion by an exotic plant. Plant Soil. 2019;440:581-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04123-9
  4. Bassett IJ, Crompton CW. The biology of Canadian weeds.: 55.: Ambrosia trifida L. Can J Plant Sci. 1982;62:1003-10. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps82-148
  5. Baysinger JA, Sims BD. Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 1991;39:358-62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500073069
  6. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MH, White JS. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009;24:127-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
  7. Brandes D, Nitzsche J. Biology, introduction, dispersal, and distribution of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) with special regard to Germany. Nachrichtenblatt-deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes Braunschweig. 2006;58:286-91.
  8. Byun C, de Blois S, Brisson J. Plant functional group identity and diversity determine biotic resistance to invasion by an exotic grass. J. Ecol. 2013;101:128-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12016
  9. Byun C, de Blois S, Brisson J. Interactions between abiotic constraint, propagule pressure, and biotic resistance regulate plant invasion. Oecologia. 2015;178:285-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3188-z
  10. Byun C, Lee EJ. Ecological application of biotic resistance to control the invasion of an invasive plant, Ageratina altissima. Ecol Evol. 2017;7:2181-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2799
  11. Byun C, Lee EJ. Giant ragweed invasion is not well controlled by biotic resistance. J Plant Biol. 2018;61:301-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-017-0472-6
  12. Byun C, Oh M, Lee EJ, Kang H. Seed density is as important as limiting similarity, diversity effect, and propagule pressure in plant restoration to control invasion. Ecol. Eng. 2020;144:105712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105712
  13. Carley HE, Watson R. Effect of various aqueous plant extracts upon seed germination. Botanical gazette. 1968;129:57-62. https://doi.org/10.1086/336412
  14. Derr JF. Common reed (Phragmites Australis) response to mowing and herbicide application. Invas. Plant Sci. Manage. 2008;1:12-6. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-07-001.1
  15. Gadermaier G, Dedic A, Obermeyer G, Frank S, Himly M, Ferreira F. Biology of weed pollen allergens. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2004;4:391-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-004-0090-5
  16. Gentili R, Gilardelli F, Ciappetta S, Ghiani A, Citterio S. Inducing competition: intensive grassland seeding to control Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Weed Res. 2015;55:278-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12143
  17. Gentili R, Montagnani C, Gilardelli F, Guarino MF, Citterio S. Let native species take their course: Ambrosia artemisiifolia replacement during natural or "artificial" succession. Acta Oecol. 2017;82:32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2017.05.007
  18. Harms RS, Hiebert RD. Vegetation response following invasive tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) removal and implications for riparian restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2006;14:461-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00154.x
  19. Harrison SK, Regnier EE, Schmoll JT, Webb JE. Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci. 2001;49:224-9. https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0224:cafogr]2.0.co;2
  20. Kaur S, Sandell LD, Lindquist JL, Jhala AJ. Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol. 2014;28:569-77. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-14-00009.1
  21. Kettenring KM, Adams CR. Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011;48:970-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01979.x
  22. Kong CH, Wang P, Xu XH. Allelopathic interference of Ambrosia trifida with wheat (Triticum aestivum). Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2007;119:416-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.07.014
  23. Lee CS, Cho YC, Shin HC, Kim GS, Pi JH. Control of an invasive alien species, Ambrosia trifida with restoration by introducing willows as a typical riparian vegetation. J Ecol Environ. 2010;33:157-64. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2010.33.2.157
  24. Lindig-Cisneros R, Zedler J. Effect of light on seed germination in Phalaris arundinacea L. (reed canary grass). Plant Ecol. 2001;155:75-8. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013224514980
  25. Lindig-Cisneros R, Zedler JB. Phalaris arundinacea seedling establishment: effects of canopy complexity in fen, mesocosm, and restoration experiments. Can J Botany. 2002a;80:617-24. https://doi.org/10.1139/b02-042
  26. Lindig-Cisneros R, Zedler JB. Relationships between canopy complexity and germination microsites for Phalaris arundinacea L. Oecologia. 2002b;133:159-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1020-7
  27. Menges ES, Waller DM. Plant strategies in relation to elevation and light in floodplain herbs. Am Naturalist. 1983;122:454-73. https://doi.org/10.1086/284149
  28. Milakovic I, Fiedler K, Karrer G. Management of roadside populations of invasive Ambrosia artemisiifolia by mowing. Weed Res. 2014;54:256-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12074
  29. Nemec KT, Allen CR, Helzer CJ, Wedin DA. Influence of richness and seeding density on invasion resistance in experimental tallgrass prairie restorations. Ecol. Restor. 2013;31:168-85. https://doi.org/10.3368/er.31.2.168
  30. Reid AM, Morin L, Downey PO, French K, Virtue JG. Does invasive plant management aid the restoration of natural ecosystems? Biol. Conserv. 2009;142:2342-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.011
  31. Reinhardt Adams C, Galatowitsch SM. The transition from invasive species control to native species promotion and its dependence on seed density thresholds. Appl Vegetation Sci. 2008;11:131-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2008.tb00211.x
  32. Scott JM. Seed coatings and treatments and their effects on plant establishment. Pages 43-83 Advances in agronomy. Vol. 42. Netherlands: Elsevier; 1989. p. 43-83.
  33. Simard M, Benoit DL. Effect of repetitive mowing on common ragweed (Ambrosia Artemissifolia L.) pollen and seed production. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2011;18:55-62.
  34. Skalova H, Wen-Yong G, Moravcova L, Pysek P. Performance of Ambrosia artemisiifolia and its potential competitors in an experimental temperature and salinity gradient and implications for management. Manage Biol Invasions. 2019;10:359. https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2019.10.2.10
  35. Vink JP, Soltani N, Robinson DE, Tardif FJ, Lawton MB, Sikkema PH. Glyphosateresistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) control with preplant herbicides in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Can J Plant Sci. 2012;92:913-22. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2012-025
  36. Washitani I. Plant conservation ecology for management and restoration of riparian habitats of lowland Japan. Popul. Ecol. 2001;43:189-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-001-8182-8
  37. Weber E. Invasive plant species of the world: a reference guide to environmental weeds. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing; 2017.
  38. Wolfaardt G, Lawrence J, Robarts R, Caldwell D. Bioaccumulation of the herbicide diclofop in extracellular polymers and its utilization by a biofilm community during starvation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995;61:152-8. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.1.152-158.1995
  39. Yannelli FA, Karrer G, Hall R, Kollmann J, Heger T. Seed density is more effective than multi-trait limiting similarity in controlling grassland resistance against plant invasions in mesocosms. Appl Vegetation Sci. 2018;21:411-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12373