DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improve the Support System for SMEs' Commercialization of Biohealth Industry: Focusing on TRL

바이오헬스 분야 사업화를 위한 지원체계 개선방안: TRL단계를 중심으로

  • Jeon, Heesung (Strategic Planning Team, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation) ;
  • Rim, Yonghoon (Strategic Planning Team, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation) ;
  • Kang, Byungseok (Strategic Planning Team, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation) ;
  • Cho, Yun-Hee (Strategic Planning Team, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation) ;
  • Park, So-Jin (Strategic Planning Team, Osong Medical Innovation Foundation)
  • 전희성 (오송첨단의료산업진흥재단 혁신성장전략팀) ;
  • 임용훈 (오송첨단의료산업진흥재단 혁신성장전략팀) ;
  • 강병석 (오송첨단의료산업진흥재단 혁신성장전략팀) ;
  • 조윤희 (오송첨단의료산업진흥재단 혁신성장전략팀) ;
  • 박소진 (오송첨단의료산업진흥재단 혁신성장전략팀)
  • Received : 2019.12.17
  • Accepted : 2020.02.20
  • Published : 2020.02.28

Abstract

As the importance of the biohealth industry has recently increased, innovative government support is required. However due to the limitation in the support framework, a complementary support system for commercialization is needed. This study examines the concept of TRL which the existing support being following, and investigates domestic support system and overseas support cases. It points out that the current TRL-based government support policy has limitations for the commercialization of the biohealth industry, which requires a lot of time and investment. The new concept of the support system reflecting the characteristics of the bio-industry and solving the problems of late R&D stage was proposed and connected with the policy direction. It is meaningful that the role as a guideline for overcoming the gap between research and industry for the commercialization of the biohealth.

최근 바이오헬스산업의 중요성이 증가함에 따라 정부지원의 혁신성이 요구되고 있으나 지원틀의 한계가 있어 사업화를 위한 지원이 미비하여 보완적 지원체계가 시급한 실정이다. 이에 따라 본 연구는 국내의 기존 지원 및 평가가 따르는 TRL 개념을 고찰하고 이를 중심으로 현재 국내 적용 지원체계 실태와 해외의 지원사례 등을 검토하여, 정부가 펼치고 있는 현 TRL 기반의 지원정책이 오랜 기간과 투자가 많이 소요되는 바이오헬스 분야 사업화를 위해서는 한계를 가지고 있음을 지적하였다. 이를 바탕으로 후기 연구개발단계 문제점 해소를 위한 개선점과 바이오산업의 특성을 반영한 사업화 중심의 새로운 지원체계 개념을 상정하고 연구개발사업에 맞게 제시될 수 있는 정책방향과 연결지었다. 본 연구는 바이오헬스분야 사업화를 위해 연구와 산업의 거리를 좁히는 가이드라인 역할이 될 것임에 의의가 있다 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Evaluate Ltd. (2019.6) EvaluatePharma. World Preview 2019, Outlook to 2024. http://www.evaluate.com/PharmaWorldPreview2019
  2. Evaluate Ltd. (2019.6) EvaluatePharma. World Preview 2019, Outlook to 2024. http://www.evaluate.com/PharmaWorldPreview2019
  3. J. Huh. (2019.1.26.) Chosun Biz. Tech: Science/Bio.http://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2019/ 01/26/2019012600342.html
  4. J. Choi. (2019.05.29.) Yonhap Infomax. Policy/Fincnace. http://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/article View.html?idxno=4032038
  5. National Onco Venture (2018.3.22.) National Onco Venture. Anticancer New Drug Trends: Cancer-related Statistics. http://nov.ncc.re.kr/%EA%B8%B0%EC%88%A0%ED%86%B5%EA%B3%84-fda-%EC%8B%A0%EC%95%BD-%EB%B0%8F-%ED%95%AD%EC%95%94%EC%A0%9C-%ED%97%88%EA%B0%80-%ED%98%84%ED%99%A9/
  6. S. Lee. (2019.7) Implications for National R & D Investment and Corporate Support in New Drug Development, KPBMA Brief, 18, 6-12.
  7. Ministry of Science & ICT, Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning (2019.3) 2019 Survey of Research and Development in Korea Statistics
  8. S. Shin. (2014). An Analysis on the Factors for Technology Commercialization Success and Failure in Korean Small Firm owned by Technical Entrepreneur. Ph.D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Kumoh National Institue of Technology.
  9. Y. Lee. (2010). Technology Commercialization, Seoul : Dunam.
  10. D. Lee. (2009). A Study on Effect of Technological Innovation Capability and Technology Commercialization Capability on Business Performance in SMEs of Korea. Ph.D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Soongsil University.
  11. J. Park. (2008). Technology Commercialization Theory and Technology Management Application Plan-Focusing on Jolly's theory. KIET Industrial Economics, Feb. 2008.
  12. J. Park. (2008). Current Status and Development Tasks of Technology Commercialization in Korea, KIET Issue paper, 2008-233.
  13. K. Bakke, & C. Haskins. (2018). Wiley Online Library. INCOSE International Symposium. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2018.00502.x
  14. J. Seo, G. Jeon, & H. Jeon. (2007). A Study on TRL Application to the Materials and Components Development Program, Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 10(2), 789-807.
  15. S. R. Sadin, F. P. Povinelli, & R. Rosen. (1989). The NASA technology push towards future space mission systems. Space and Humanity. Pergamon, 73-77.
  16. R. Mackey, R. Some, & A. Aljabri. (2003). Readiness levels for spacecraft information technologies, 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, Big Sky, MT, USA, vol.1, 1-398.
  17. P. Malone, R. Smoker, H. Apgar, & L. Wolfarth. (2011). The application of TRL metrics to existing cost prediction models, 2011 Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, 1-12.
  18. M. S. Seablom, & L. A. Lemmerman. (2012). Measuring technology maturity and readiness for mission infusion. In 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 5646-5649.
  19. C. Wei-gang, L. Wo-ye, G. Yan, & H. Fei. (2013). Approach and application of technology readiness assessment based-on multilevel reference condition, 2013 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering 20th Annual Conference Proceedings, Harbin, 2013, 1993-1998.
  20. J. Hong, S. Park, W. Suh, & J. Park. (2009). Developing a Model of Technology Readiness Levels(TRLs) for a Large-Scale National Research and Development Project, Journal of the Korea industrial information systems society, 14(3), 58-75.
  21. E. Kujawski. (2013). Analysis and Critique of the System Readiness Level, in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics: Systems, 43(4), 979-987. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2012.2209868
  22. J. Choo. (2015). A Study on the Effectiveness of SMEs R & D projects that reflect the Technology Readiness Level. Ph.D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Kyungpook National University.
  23. NASA. (2012) NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/heo/scan/engineering/technology/txt_accordion1.html
  24. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology. (2009). TRL Evaluation Indicators by Industrial Original Strategic Technology
  25. S. Baek. (2018). Study on the Moderating Effect of TRL and Convergence for Technology Transfer and Commercialization in National research and Development : with a Focus on Korea Railroad research projcet. Ph.D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University.
  26. U.S. Department of Defense. (2009). Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Deskbook
  27. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Medical Countermeasures.gov. Integrated TRLs. https://www.medicalcountermeasures.gov/trl/integrated-trls/
  28. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2018.06.29.) Attached document 1 of Notice for 2018 the Third Health Technology R&D Project support.
  29. H. Kim, W. Woo, & B. Jang. (2013). A Study on Readiness Assessment for The Acquisition of High Quality Weapon System, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 41(3), 395-404. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.3.395
  30. J. Morone, & R. Ivins. (1982). Problems and opportunities in technology transfer from the national laboratories to industry. Research Management, 25(3), 35-44.
  31. H. Jie, G. Zhaofeng, & Z. Kui. (2011). Research on evaluation method of electronic product maturity. In 2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering, 2, 118-121.
  32. H. Kirkham, & C. Marinovici. (2013). Technology readiness and the smart grid. In 2013 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT). 1-6.
  33. Z. Juan, L. Wei, & P. Xiamei. (2010). Research on Technology Transfer Readiness Level and Its Application in University Technology Innovation Management. In 2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government, 1904-1907
  34. T. Altunok, & T. Cakmak. (2010). A technology readiness levels(TRLs) calculator software for systems engineering and technology management tool, Advances in Engineering Software, 41(5), 769-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.12.018
  35. J. Hong, S. Park, W. Suh, & J. Park. (2009). Developing a Model of Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) for a Large-Scale National Research and Development Project, Journal of the Korea industrial information systems society, 14(3), 58-75.
  36. J. Kim, (2010). Development of a Model for the System level Technical Maturity Assessment Process in Defense R&D Programs, Ph.D. Thesis, The Graduate School of Ajou University.
  37. H. Hwang, H. Kim, & Y. Chang. (2012). TRL Impact on Development Schedule and Cost in the Aerospace Project, Journal of the Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 40(3), 264-272. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2012.40.3.264
  38. Y. Bae, & S. Choi. (2009). Calculation TRL using Integration Readiness Between Technologies for Supporting Technology-transition of Defense Technologies to the Defense Weapons System, Korean management science review, 26(3), 157-167.
  39. S. Lee, & D. Ryu. (2016). TRA Application Status and Development Direction, Defense and Technology, (445), 104-119.
  40. B. Yoon. (2018). Operational Management Status and Audit Implications for National R&D Project Planning and Selection Evaluation, Seoul : The Audit and Inspection Research Institute, The Board of Audit and inspection of Korea.