Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Alveolar cleft bone grafting: factors affecting case prognosis

  • Mahardawi, Basel (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University) ;
  • Boonsiriseth, Kiatanant (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University) ;
  • Pairuchvej, Verasak (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University) ;
  • Wongsirichat, Natthamet (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University)
  • Received : 2020.02.22
  • Accepted : 2020.06.05
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the significance and impact of several factors on the alveolar cleft bone grafting procedure. Materials and Methods: The medical records were reviewed. In addition, x-rays were checked. The size of every cleft was measured in this retrospective study. The analyzed factors included sex, age, type of cleft, size of the cleft, and the type of flap used in surgery. The patients were characterized into group A (no complications, Bergland scale 1 or 2), group B (complications or Bergland scale 3), or group C (failure cases). Statistical analysis was performed with a P-value set at 0.05. Results: There were 32 cases in group A, 26 in group B, and 9 in group C. Multinomial logistic regression showed an association between the type of the cleft and the size of the cleft, with the presence of complications, or achieving type 3 on the Bergland scale, with odds ratios of 5.118 and 6.000, respectively. The type of cleft was related to failure with an odds ratio of 4.833. Given a small sample, statistical analysis could not be performed to evaluate the relationship between the size of the cleft and group C. Age, sex, and the type of the flap were not significant factors. Conclusion: The cleft size of more than 10 mm and bilateral clefts were listed regarding their effect on the procedure. Clinicians should not overlook these factors. In addition, patients must be informed of any risks that are present.

Keywords

References

  1. Souza J, Raskin S. Clinical and epidemiological study of orofacial clefts. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2013;89:137-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2013.03.010
  2. Emeka CI, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Butali A. A comparative study of quality of life of families with children born with cleft lip and/or palate before and after surgical treatment. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;43:247-55. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.4.247
  3. Schutte BC, Murray JC. The many faces and factors of orofacial clefts. Hum Mol Genet 1999;8:1853-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/8.10.1853
  4. Wu C, Pan W, Feng C, Su Z, Duan Z, Zheng Q, et al. Grafting materials for alveolar cleft reconstruction: a systematic review and best-evidence synthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47:345-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.003
  5. Chen GC, Sun M, Yin NB, Li HD. A novel method to calculate the volume of alveolar cleft defect before surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:342-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004181
  6. Khojasteh A, Kheiri L, Behnia H, Tehranchi A, Nazeman P, Nadjmi N, et al. Lateral ramus cortical bone plate in alveolar cleft osteoplasty with concomitant use of buccal fat pad derived cells and autogenous bone: phase I clinical trial. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:6560234. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6560234
  7. Kaura AS, Srinivasa DR, Kasten SJ. Optimal timing of alveolar cleft bone grafting for maxillary clefts in the cleft palate population. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:1551-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004680
  8. Shirzadeh A, Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. A prospective study of chin bone graft harvesting for unilateral maxillary alveolar cleft during mixed dentition. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:180-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.07.143
  9. Aly LA, Hammouda N. Secondary closure of alveolar cleft with resorbable collagen membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2016;6:165-71. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.200351
  10. Rachmiel A, Emodi O, Aizenbud D, Rachmiel D, Shilo D. Twostage reconstruction of the severely deficient alveolar ridge: bone graft followed by alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;47:117-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.007
  11. Sun J, Zhang X, Li R, Chen Z, Huang Y, Chen Z. Biological effects of orthodontic tooth movement into the grafted alveolar cleft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:605-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.029
  12. Nystrom E, Kahnberg KE, Gunne J. Bone grafts and Brånemark implants in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:45-53.
  13. Jensen OT. Alveolar segmental "sandwich" osteotomies for posterior edentulous mandibular sites for dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:471-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.11.030
  14. Jensen OT, Greer RO Jr, Johnson L, Kassebaum D. Vertical guided bone-graft augmentation in a new canine mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:335-44.
  15. Elhaddaoui R, Bahije L, Zaoui F, Rerhrhaye W. [Timing of alveolar bone graft and sequences of canine eruption in cases of cleft lip and palate: a systematic review]. Orthod Fr 2017;88:193-8. French. https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2017011
  16. Kamal M, Ziyab AH, Bartella A, Mitchell D, Al-Asfour A, Hölzle F, et al. Volumetric comparison of autogenous bone and tissue-engineered bone replacement materials in alveolar cleft repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;56:453-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.05.007
  17. Kang NH. Current methods for the treatment of alveolar cleft. Arch Plast Surg 2017;44:188-93. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.188
  18. Van der Meij AJ, Baart JA, Prahl-Andersen B, Valk J, Kostense PJ, Tuinzing DB. Bone volume after secondary bone grafting in unilateral and bilateral clefts determined by computed tomography scans. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:136-41. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.115274
  19. von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. The TIME technique: a new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:387-94.
  20. Bergland O, Semb G, Abyholm FE. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:175-205.
  21. Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W, Rothamel D, Kloss F, Blessmann M, et al. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials - from space holders to innovative biomaterials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:706-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.002
  22. Bajaj AK, Wongworawat AA, Punjabi A. Management of alveolar clefts. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:840-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200311000-00005
  23. Cohen M, Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Secondary (intermediate) alveolar bone grafting. Clin Plast Surg 1993;20:691-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-1298(20)32408-1
  24. Hammoudeh JA, Fahradyan A, Gould DJ, Liang F, Imahiyerobo T, Urbinelli L, et al. A comparative analysis of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 with a demineralized bone matrix versus iliac crest bone graft for secondary alveolar bone grafts in patients with cleft lip and palate: review of 501 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140:318e-25e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003519
  25. Freitas JA, das Neves LT, de Almeida AL, Garib DG, Trindade-Suedam IK, Yaedu RY, et al. Rehabilitative treatment of cleft lip and palate: experience of the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies/USP (HRAC/USP)--part 1: overall aspects. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000100003
  26. Arctander K, Kolbenstvedt A, Aalokken TM, Abyholm F, Froslie KF. Computed tomography of alveolar bone grafts 20 years after repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2005;39:11-4. https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310410021749
  27. Jia YL, James DR, Mars M. Bilateral alveolar bone grafting: a report of 55 consecutively-treated patients. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:299-307. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/20.3.299
  28. Troxell JB, Fonseca RJ, Osbon DB. A retrospective study of alveolar cleft grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1982;40:721-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(82)90145-8
  29. El Deeb M, Messer LB, Lehnert MW, Hebda TW, Waite DE. Canine eruption into grafted bone in maxillary alveolar cleft defects. Cleft Palate J 1982;19:9-16.
  30. Murthy AS, Lehman JA. Secondary alveolar bone grafting: an outcome analysis. Can J Plast Surg 2006;14:172-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/229255030601400307
  31. Lim HK, Kim JW, Lee UL, Kim JW, Lee H. Risk factor analysis of graft failure with concomitant cyst enucleation of the jaw bone: a retrospective multicenter study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:1668-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.003
  32. Zuo W, Sun W, Zhao D, Gao F, Su Y, Li Z. Investigating clinical failure of bone grafting through a window at the femoral head neck junction surgery for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. PLoS One 2016;11:e0156903. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156903
  33. Horowitz I, Bodner L. Use of xenograft bone with aspirated bone marrow for treatment of cystic defect of the jaws. Head Neck 1989;11:516-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2880110608
  34. Khodayari A, Khojasteh A, Kiani M, Nayebi A, Mehrdad L, Vahdatinia M. Spontaneous regeneration of the mandible after hemimandibulectomy: report of a case. J Dent (Tehran) 2011;8:152-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(80)90032-9