DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diagnostic analysis of vertical orbital dystopia and canthal tilt for surgical correction

  • Lee, Ju-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital) ;
  • Choung, Han-Wool (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital) ;
  • Choung, Pill-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2020.05.18
  • Accepted : 2020.08.10
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to identify a clinically useful method of analyzing orbital dystopia to aid in diagnosis and treatment planning and to quantify vertical discrepancies in eye level and variations in canthal tilt in Koreans. Patients and Methods: In 76 Korean patients with a mean age of 23.12 years, mean differences in the level of the pupils, lateral canthi, medial canthi, and canthal tilt were measured. The difference in pupil level was calculated from the perpendicular lines drawn from the midpupil area of each eye to the midline of the face to determine the amount of skeletal discrepancy of the eye. Soft tissue discrepancies were determined according to the vertical difference between the lines drawn from the lateral or medial canthus of each eye perpendicular to the midline of the face. The canthal tilt was determined from the inclination of a line connecting the lateral and medial canthi, then classified as class I, II, or III. Results: Mean differences in pupil level, medial canthi, and lateral canthi were 1.57±1.10 mm, 1.14±1.07 mm, and 2.03±1.64 mm, respectively. The mean degree of canthal tilt were 8.45°±3.53° for the right side and 8.42°±3.81° for the left side. No study participants presented with class III canthal tilt. The mean canthal tilt values for those with class I tilt were 3.21°±1.68° for the right side and 3.18°±1.63° for the left side, while, for those who had class II tilt, the values were 9.60°±3.66° for the right side and 9.54°±2.99° for the left side. Conclusion: The presented diagnostic method of orbital dystopia can be used to effectively establish a treatment plan that takes into consideration the patient's skeletal and soft-tissue discrepancies.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi KY. Analysis of facial asymmetry. Arch Craniofac Surg 2015;16:1-10. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2015.16.1.1
  2. Song WC, Koh KS, Kim SH, Hu KS, Kim HJ, Park JC, et al. Horizontal angular asymmetry of the face in Korean young adults with reference to the eye and mouth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2164-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.018
  3. Hwang HS, Youn IS, Lee KH, Lim HJ. Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:279.e1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.017
  4. Altug-Atac AT, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Comparison of skeletal and soft-tissue changes following unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1751-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31816aa003
  5. Yamashita Y, Nakamura Y, Shimada T, Nomura Y, Hirashita A. Asymmetry of the lips of orthognathic surgery patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:559-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.057
  6. Yu CC, Bergeron L, Lin CH, Chu YM, Chen YR. Single-splint technique in orthognathic surgery: intraoperative checkpoints to control facial symmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:879-86. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b03842
  7. Edgerton MT, Jane JA. Vertical orbital dystopia--surgical correction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;67:121-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198102000-00001
  8. Tan ST, Mulliken JB. Hypertelorism: nosologic analysis of 90 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:317-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199702000-00004
  9. Shakir S, Hoppe IC, Taylor JA. State-of-the-art hypertelorism management. Clin Plast Surg 2019;46:185-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2018.11.004
  10. Laure B, Batut C, Benouhagrem A, Joly A, Travers N, Listrat A, et al. Addressing hypertelorism: indications and techniques. Neurochirurgie 2019;65:286-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.09.007
  11. Batut C, Joly A, Travers N, Guichard B, Pare A, Laure B. Surgical treatment of orbital hypertelorism: historical evolution and development prospects. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019;47:1712-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.002
  12. Winters R. Tessier clefts and hypertelorism. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2016;24:545-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2016.06.013
  13. Engel M, Hoffmann J, Castrillon-Oberndorfer G, Freudlsperger C. The value of three-dimensional printing modelling for surgical correction of orbital hypertelorism. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;19:91-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-014-0466-1
  14. Liu DL, Shan L, Yuan Q, Huang JJ. Refinement of the correction of orbital hypertelorism. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:217-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f7604f
  15. Tan ST, Ashworth G, Czypionka S, Poole MD, Briggs M. Vertical orbital dystopia. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97:1349-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199606000-00004
  16. Poole MD, Briggs M. The cranio-facio-cervical scoliosis complex. Br J Plast Surg 1990;43:670-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(90)90187-5
  17. Kim EJ, Ki EJ, Cheon HM, Choi EJ, Kwon KH. 3-Dimensional analysis for class III malocclusion patients with facial asymmetry. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;39:168-74. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.4.168
  18. Cook JT. Asymmetry of the cranio-facial skeleton. Br J Orthod 1980;7:33-8. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.7.1.33
  19. Moore FO, Thornton BP, Zabel DD, Vasconez HC. Autogenous orbital reconstruction in a child with congenital abnormalities of the orbital roof and vertical orbital dystopia. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:930-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200411000-00008
  20. Tessier P. Congenital orbital dystopias. In: Tessier P, Rougier J, Wolfe SA, eds. Plastic surgery of the orbit and eyelids. New York: Masson Publishing; 1981:191-9.
  21. De Ponte FS, Fadda T, Rinna C, Brunelli A, Iannetti G. Early and late surgical treatment of orbital dystopia in craniofacial malformation. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8:17-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199701000-00008
  22. Rhee SC, Woo KS, Kwon B. Biometric study of eyelid shape and dimensions of different races with references to beauty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012;36:1236-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9937-7
  23. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994:101-11.
  24. Lam BL, Lam S, Walls RC. Prevalence of palpebral fissure asymmetry in white persons. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:518-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72667-4
  25. Doganay F, Dadaci Z, Topcu-Yilmaz P, Doganay Aydin H. The association between ocular dominance and physiological palpebral fissure asymmetry. Laterality 2017;22:412-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2016.1209212
  26. Song WC, Kim SJ, Kim SH, Hu KS, Kim HJ, Koh KS. Asymmetry of the palpebral fissure and upper eyelid crease in Koreans. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2007;60:251-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.04.027