디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제18권12호
  • /
  • Pages.159-170
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

현장관리자의 진성리더십이 외국인 근로자의 신뢰, 직무열의, 및 이직의도에 미치는 영향 -국내기업의 필리핀 근로자를 중심으로-

The Effect of Field Managers' Authentic Leadership on Foreign Workers' Trust, Work Engagement, and Turnover Intention -Focusing on Filipino Workers in South Korea-

  • 투고 : 2020.10.20
  • 심사 : 2020.12.20
  • 발행 : 2020.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

한국의 국제 노동력이 끊임없이 증가함에 따라 외국인 근로자의 해외 생활과 근로는 리더십 분야에 새로운 연구 시각을 제공하였다. 본 연구는 U와 G 지역에 거주하는 필리핀 국적인 외국인 근로자를 대상으로 리더십은 실제로 외국인 근로자의 상태와 태도에 영향을 미칠 수 있는지에 대해 논의하였다. 특히, 진성리더십이 외국인 근로자의 직무열의와 이직의도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 또한 신뢰를 매개로 하여 외국인 근로자의 직무열의와 이직의도에 미치는 영향을 검증하였다. 연구 결과에 따르면 진성리더십은 필리핀 국적 외국인 근로자의 직무열의와 선명한 관계를 가지고 있지 않은 반면에 외국인 근로자의 이직의도에 부(-)정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 진성리더십이 외국인 근로자의 이직의도에 신뢰를 완전 매개하여 부(-)정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 신뢰의 매개 작용은 리더와 부하 간의 신뢰 구축이 필요하다는 것을 보여주었다. 마지막으로 본 연구는 다양한 시각에서 연구 결과의 원인에 대해 논의하였으며, 연구의 한계점과 미래연구의 방향을 확인되었다.

With increasing international labour in Korea, the perspective of foreign workers' maintenance and changes of origin while living and working overseas provides a new angle for leadership research. For the purpose to investigate the effect of leadership on the group of foreign workers, this study targeted Filipino workers in U and G city and explored whether authentic leadership predicts foreign workers' work engagement and retainment through the potential intervening effect of interpersonal trust. The empirical study utilized SPSS, and results proved that authentic leadership has no significant relationship to foreign Filipino workers' work engagement directly, but authentic leadership showed a negative effect on Filipino workers' turnover intention. The full mediation effect of interpersonal trust proves the value and importance of establishing trust relationships in retaining foreign workers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. Hayes. (2018). The theory and practice of change management. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. K. S. Cho & H. Y. Park. (2015). Why Does Trust Mediate the Effects of Ethical and Authentic Leadership in Korean Firms? Asian International Studies Review, 16(2), 49-70. DOI:10.16934/isr.16.2.201512.49
  3. Statistics Korea. (2020). 2019 Survey on Immigrants' Living Conditions and labour Force. Seoul: KOSTAT (Online). http://kostat.go.kr/portal/eng/pressReleases/5/3/index.board
  4. J. Y. Park, D. Y. Yoon & C. J. Wook. (2019). The Effects of Authentic Leadership on Turnover Intention of Foreign Workers - The Mediating Effect of Job Stress -. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 26(3), 33-55. DOI:10.14396/jhrmr.2019.26.3.33
  5. R. H. Kim. (2019). A Study on the Mediating Effect of Human Resource Management System on Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Performance of Employers Employing Foreign Workers -For Foreign workers from 10 countries working in Korea-. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul Venture University, Seoul.
  6. Y. H. Cho, G. C. Yu, M. K. Joo & C. Rowley. (2014). Changing corporate culture over time in South Korea. Asia Pacific Business Review, 20(1), 9-17. DOI:10.1080/13602381.2012.755321
  7. F. O. Walumbwa, B. J. Avolio, W. L. Gardner, T. S. Wernsing & S. J. Peterson. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. DOI:10.1177/0149206307308913
  8. B. J. Avolio, W. L. Gardner, F. O. Walumbwa, F. Luthans & D. R. May. (2004). Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
  9. J. G. Tak. J. G. Seo & T. W. Roh. (2019). Leader's authentic leadership and follower's project performance. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(6), 105-112. DOI:10.14400/JDC.2019.17.6.105
  10. W. B. Schaufeli, A. B. Bakker & M. Salanova. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716. DOI:10.1177/0013164405282471
  11. W. A. Kahn. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. DOI:10.5465/256287
  12. A. Decuypere & W. Schaufeli. (2020). Leadership and work engagement: Exploring explanatory mechanisms. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 69-95. DOI:10.1177/2397002219892197
  13. W. H. Mobley, R. W. Griffeth, H. H. Hand & B. M. Meglino. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 493-522. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.493
  14. R. P. Tett & J. P. Meyer. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259-293. DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
  15. D. J. McAllister. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59. DOI:10.2307/256727
  16. Y. B. Cho & H. Y. Kang. (2020). An effect on employees' turnover intention of hospital social responsibility. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(5), 197-203. DOI:10.14400/JDC.2020.18.5.197
  17. L. T. Hosmer. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 393-403. DOI: 10.2307/258851
  18. R. Borum. (2010). The science of interpersonal trust. McLean, VA: Mitre Corporation.
  19. Y. D. Sung, D. Y. Yoon & J. W. Chang. (2019). The effects of authentic leadership on turnover intention in the Korea shipbuilding industry: The moderating effect of job engagement. Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 26(3), 33-55.
  20. H. K. Lee. (2014). Effects of authentic leadership on organizational commitment for employees. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(5), 181-190. DOI:10.14400/JDC.2014.12.5.181
  21. J. P. Kim. (2015). A Study on the Influence of Authentic Leadership in the Age of Convergence on the Organizational Effectiveness: Revolved around Effect of Tuned from Confidence of Superior. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(12), 125-134. DOI:10.14400/JDC.2015.13.12.125
  22. B. D. Adams & J. A. Sartori. (2006). Validating the trust in teams and trust in leaders scales. DRDC No. CR-2006-008, Defence Research & Development, Toronto, ON.
  23. P. M. Podsakoff, S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee & N. P. Podsakoff. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  24. R. M. Baron & D. A. Kenny. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
  25. A. B. Bakker & S. Albrecht. (2018). Work engagement: current trends. Career Development International, 23(1), 4-11. DOI:10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0207
  26. S. H. Shin & Y. J. Park. (2019). The effects of authentic leadership on employee's in-role performance in Ppuri company: Analysis of moderating effect between foreigner and native. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(6), 93-104. DOI:10.14400/JDC.2019.17.6.093