디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

광역자치단체의 기계학습 행정서비스 업무유형에 관한 연구 -서울시를 중심으로-

A Study on the Work Type of Machine Learning Administrative Service in Metropolitan Government

  • 투고 : 2020.09.14
  • 심사 : 2020.12.20
  • 발행 : 2020.12.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 배경은 최근 포스트 코로나시대의 비대면 행정서비스를 위한 주요 정책수단으로 기계학습 행정서비스가 주목을 받고 있는 가운데 기계학습 행정서비스를 시범적으로 운영하고 있는 서울특별시를 대상으로 기계학습 행정서비스 도입 시 효과가 예상되는 업무유형에 대하여 살펴보았다. 연구방법으로는 2020년 7월 한 달 동안 기계학습 기반 행정서비스를 활용하거나 수행하고 있는 서울시 행정조직을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 조직단위별 도입 가능한 기계학습 행정서비스 및 응용서비스를 분석하고, 지도학습, 비지도학습, 강화학습 등 기계학습 행정서비스의 업무유형별 특성을 분석하였다. 그 결과, 지도학습 및 비지도학습 업무유형의 특성에서 유의미한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났고, 특히 강화학습 업무유형이 기계학습 행정서비스에 가장 적합한 업무적 특성요인을 포함하고 있는 것으로 밝혀져 그에 대한 정책적 시사점을 도출하였다. 본 연구결과는 기계학습 행정서비스를 도입하고자 하는 실무자들에게는 참고자료로 제공될 수 있고, 향후 기계학습 행정서비스를 연구하고자 하는 연구자들에게는 연구의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

The background of this study is that machine learning administrative services are recently attracting attention as a major policy tool for non-face-to-face administrative services in the post-corona era. This study investigated the types of work expected to be effective when introducing machine learning administrative services for Seoul Metropolitan Government officials who are piloting machine learning administrative services. The research method is a machine that can be introduced by organizational unit by distributing and collecting questionnaires for Seoul administrative organizations that have performed machine learning-based administrative services for one month in July 2020 targeting Seoul public officials using machine learning-based administrative services. By analyzing the learning administration service and application service, the business characteristics of each machine learning administration service type such as supervised learning work type, unsupervised learning work type, and reinforced learning work type were analyzed. As a result of the research analysis, it was found that there were significant differences in the characteristics of administrative tasks by supervised and unsupervised learning areas. In particular, it was found that the reinforcement learning domain contains the most appropriate business characteristics for machine learning administrative services. Implications were drawn. The results of this study can be provided as a reference material to practitioners who want to introduce machine learning administration services, and can be used as basic data for research to researchers who want to study machine learning administration services in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Accenture (2016). Digital government: Your digital citizens are ready, willing… and wait in Retrieved March
  2. R. Ayachi, I. (2016). Proactive and reactive e-government services recommendation Universal Access in the Information Society, 15 (4) pp. 681-697
  3. J. Bosse, M. Burnett, (2015). European Public Sector Award 2015: The public sector as partner for a better society European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  4. European Commission 2016). eGovernment benchmark 2016: A turning point for eGovernment development in Europe? Final insight report Vol. 1.
  5. Hendrik Scholta et al (2019). From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model, Government Information Quarterly 36(1), pp. 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.010
  6. Initiative D21, & fortiss eGovernment Monitor (2018). Nutzung und Akzeptanz digitaler Verwaltungsangebote-Deutschland, Osterreich und Schweiz im Vergleich Retrieved March 30, 2018.
  7. D. Linders, et al. (2018). Proactive e-governance: Flipping the service delivery model from pull to push in Taiwan, Government Information Quarterly 35(4) S68-S76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.004
  8. Sirendi and Taveter (2016). Bringing service design thinking into the public sector to create proactive and user-friendly public services, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on HCI in Business, Government and Organizations (2016), pp. 221-230
  9. Kaiming He et al., (2016) "Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition," Proc. IEEE Conference Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770-778, http://mng.bz/PO5P.
  10. Christian Szegedy et al., (2015) "Going Deeper with Convolutions," Proc. IEEE Conference Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015, pp. 1-9, http://mng.bz/JzGv.
  11. Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge 2017 (ILSVRC2017) results, http://image-net.org/ challenges/LSVRC/2017/results.
  12. Yunpeng Chen et al., "Dual Path Networks," https://arxiv.org/pdf/1707.01629.pdf.
  13. Yonghui Wu et al.,(2016) "Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation," submitted 26 Sept. 2016, https://arxiv.org/ abs/1609.08144.
  14. Chung-Cheng Chiu et al.,(2017) "State-of-the- Art Speech Recognition with Sequence-to- Sequence Models," submitted 5 Dec. 2017, https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01769.
  15. Volodymyr Mnih et al., (2013) "Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning," NIPS Deep Learning Workshop 2013, https://arxiv.org/ abs/1312.5602.
  16. David Silver et al., "Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithm," submitted 5 Dec. 2017, https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01815.
  17. Varun Gulshan et al., "Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs," JAMA, vol. 316, no. 22, 2016, pp. 2402-2410, http://mng.bz/wlDQ. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17216