Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures (한국공간구조학회논문집)

Korean Association for Spatial Structures (한국공간구조학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Resilience-Based Performance Evaluation Method of Structures and Their Application Plan

구조물의 회복탄력성 기반 성능평가법에 대한 고찰 및 적용 방안에 관한 연구

  • 김유성 (영남대학교 일반대학원 건축학과) ;
  • 강주원 (영남대학교 건축학부) ;
  • 이준호 (서일대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2020.11.18
  • Accepted : 2020.11.30
  • Published : 2020.12.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The resilience performance evaluation method of a structure can evaluate the ability to recover after an earthquake disaster, and this study deals with the consideration and introduction of the resilience performance evaluation method. The resilience evaluation method can be expressed as a quantified number by constructing a loss estimation model and a recovery evaluation model. The recovery evaluation model should consider downtime in addition to the repair time, and the loss estimation model should consider not only direct loss to structures and non-structures, but also indirect loss due to functional loss of the building. In addition, to build a loss estimation model, the structure should be simplified to perform an efficient analysis. Therefore, in this study, the equivalent terminal induction system proposed cantilever-type and rahmen-type SDOF, and it is evaluated somewhat conservatively compared to the example structure, and it is judged that there is a need to improve the hysteresis characteristics by applying the stiffness reduction factor of the SDOF model.

Keywords

References

  1. Almufti, I., & Willford, M., "REDiTM Rating System: Resilience-based Earthquake Design Initiative for the Next Generation of Buildings", Resilience-based Earthquake Design Initiative (REDiTM) Rating System, 2013, pp.1-133 doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20267.75043
  2. Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., & Bruneau, M., "Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience", Engineering Structures, Vol.32, No.11, pp.3639-3649, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
  3. American Society of Civil Engineers & Risk and Resilience Measurement Committee, "Resilience-Based Performance: Next Generation Guidelines for Buildings and Lifeline Standards", American Society of Civil Engineers, pp.1-85, 2019.
  4. Cimellaro, G. P., Renschler, C., & Bruneau, M., "Introduction to Resilience-Based Design (RBD)", Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.33, pp.151-183, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06394-2_10
  5. Hadigheh, S. A., Mahini, S. S., Setunge, S., & Mahin, S. A., "A preliminary case study of resilience and performance of rehabilitated buildings subjected to earthquakes", Earthquakes and Structures, Vol.11, No.6, pp.967-982, 2016, doi: 10.12989/eas.2016.11.6.967
  6. Federal Emergency Management Agency, "FEMA P-58; Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings Volume 1", FEMA, pp.1-1-8-7, 2018.
  7. Han, S. W., Moon, K. H., & Kim, J. S., "Equivalent SDF Systems Representing Steel Moment Resisting Frames", Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, Vol.12, No.3, pp.21-28, 2008, doi: 10.5000/EESK.2008.12.3.021
  8. Architectural Institute of Korea, "Seismic Building Design Code and Commentry : KDS 41 17 00", pp.26-27, 2019.
  9. Barbet, A. H., Pujades, L. G., & Lantada, N., "Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: Application to Barcelona", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.28, No.10-11, pp.851-865, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.006
  10. Federal Emergency Management Agency, "FEMA P695; Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors", FEMA, pp.1-1-11-12, 2009.