Acknowledgement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
- Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
- Allison, P. D. (2003). Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 545-557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.545
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Bervell, B., & Umar, I. N. (2017). Validation of the UTAUT model: Re-considering non-linear relationships of Exogenous variables in higher education technology acceptance research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6471-6490.
- Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
- Birch, A., & Irvine, V. (2009). Preservice teachers' acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: Applying the UTAUT model. Educational Media International, 46(4), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980903387506
- Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Publications Inc.
- Caudill, J. G. (2007). The growth of m-learning and the growth of mobile computing: Parallel developments. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.348
- Cazan, A. M., Cocorada, E., & Maican, C. I. (2016). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards the computer and the internet with Romanian high-school and university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.001
- Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60(1), 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.008
- Chou, C. C., Block, L., & Jesness, R. (2012). A case study of mobile learning pilot project in K-12 schools. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 5(2), 11-26.
- Chua, S. L., Chen, D., & Wong, A. F. L. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 609-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00039-4
- Cilliers, L. (2017). Wiki acceptance by university students to improve collaboration in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(5), 485-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1180255
- Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995a). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.118
- Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995b). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
- Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/249749
- Crompton, H., Burke, D., & Gregory, K. H. (2017). The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 110, 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.013
- Crompton, H., & Keane, J. (2012). Implementation of a one-to-one iPod Touch program in a middle school. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 1-18.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
- Decman, M. (2015). Modeling the acceptance of e-learning in mandatory environments of higher education: The influence of previous education and gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 272-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.022
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
- Groves, M. M., & Zemel, P. C. (2000). Instructional technology adoption in higher education: An action research case study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(1), 57-65.
- Gu, X., Zhu, Y., & Guo, X. (2013). Meeting the "Digital Natives": Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 392-402.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis with readings (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
- Howard, G. S., & Smith, R. D. (1986). Computer anxiety in management: Myth or reality? Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 29(7), 611-615. https://doi.org/10.1145/6138.6143
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Hwang, G. J., Sung, H. Y., Hung, C. M., & Huang, I. (2013). A learning style perspective to investigate the necessity of developing adaptive learning systems. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 188-197.
- King, L. J., Gardner-McCune, C., Vargas, P., & Jimenez, Y. (2014). Re-discovering and re-creating African American historical accounts through mobile apps: The role of mobile technology in history education. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 38(3), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2013.12.005
- Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- Lin, P.-C., Lu, H.-K., & Liu, S.-C. (2013). Towards an education behavioral intention model for e-learning systems: An extension of UTAUT. Journal of Theoretical and Applied information Technology, 47(3), 1120-1127.
- MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
- McDonald, R. P. (1978). Generalizability in factorable domains: "Domain validity and generalizability" 1. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38(1), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800111
- Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2015). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
- Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers & Education, 109, 56-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005
- Pearson Education. (2015). Student mobile device survey 2015, national report: Students in grades 4-12. Retrieved from https://www.pearsoned.com/wp-content/uploads/2015-Pearson-Student-Mobile-Device-Survey-Grades-4-12.pdf
- Rahman, A., Jamaludin, A., & Mahmud, Z. (2011). Intention to use digital library based on modified UTAUT model: Perspectives of Malaysian postgraduate students. International Journal of Social, Management, Economics and Business Engineering, 5(3), 51-57.
- Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.2190/6E7K-F57M-6UY6-QAJJ
- Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers' adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
- Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Sage handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221-247). London, UK: Sage.
- Shin, W. S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at an online university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(3), 110-130.
- Song, D., & Kim, P. (2015). Inquiry-based mobilized math classroom with stanford mobile inquiry-based learning environment (SMILE). In H. Crompton, & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning and STEM: Case studies in practice (pp. 150-161). New York: Routledge.
- Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
- Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008
- Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(1), 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.641674
- Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: the competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32(3), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148853
- Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 45(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B, & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
- Wang, D., Xu, L., & Chan, H. C. (2015). Understanding the continuance use of social network sites: a computer self-efficacy perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(2), 204-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2014.952778
- Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
- Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
- Wrycza, S., Marcinkowski, B., & Gajda, D. (2017). The enriched UTAUT model for the acceptance of software engineering tools in academic education. Information Systems Management, 34(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2017.1254446
- Yukselturk, E., & Altiok, S. (2017). An investigation of the effects of programming with Scratch on the preservice IT teachers' self-efficacy perceptions and attitudes towards computer programming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 789-801. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12453
- Zainab, B., Awais Bhatti, M., & Alshagawi, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-training adoption: an examination of perceived cost, computer self-efficacy and the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(12), 1261-1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1380703