DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nanosat Formation Flying Design for SNIPE Mission

  • Kang, Seokju (Astrodynamics and Control Lab., Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University) ;
  • Song, Youngbum (Astrodynamics and Control Lab., Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Young (Astrodynamics and Control Lab., Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2020.01.28
  • Accepted : 2020.02.16
  • Published : 2020.03.15

Abstract

This study designs and analyzes satellite formation flying concepts for the Small scale magNetospheric and Ionospheric Plasma Experiments (SNIPE) mission, that will observe the near-Earth space environment using four nanosats. To meet the requirements to achieve the scientific objectives of the SNIPE mission, three formation flying concepts are analyzed: a cross-shape formation, a square-shape formation, and a cross-track formation. Of the three formation flying scenarios, the cross-track formation scenario is selected as the final scenario for the SNIPE mission. The result of this study suggests a relative orbit control scenario for formation maintenance and reconfiguration, and the initial relative orbits of the four nanosats meeting the formation requirements and thrust limitations of the SNIPE mission. The formation flying scenario is validated by calculating the accumulated total thrust required for the four nanosats. If the cross-track formation scenario presented in this study is applied to the SNIPE mission, it is expected that the mission will be successfully accomplished.

Keywords

References

  1. Clohessy WH, Wiltshire RS, Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous, J. Aerospace Sci. 27, 653-658 (1960). https://doi.org/10.2514/8.8704
  2. Eun Y, Park SY, Kim GN, Development of a hardware-in-theloop testbed to demonstrate multiple spacecraft operations in proximity, Acta Astron. 147, 48-58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.03.030
  3. Hwang J, Kim H, Park J, Lee J, Limitations of electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave observations in low Earth orbit, J. Astron. Space Sci. 35, 31-37 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2018.35.1.31
  4. Kang SJ, Design and analysis of formation flying scenario of SNIPE mission, Master's Thesis, Yonsei Universtiy (2018).
  5. Kim DY, Woo B, Park SY, Choi KH, Hybrid optimization for multiple-impulse reconfiguration trajectories of satellite formation flying, Adv. Space Res. 44, 1257-1269 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.07.029
  6. Klesh A, Baker J, Castillo-Rogez J, Halatek L, Murphy N, et al., INSPIRE: interplanetary nanospacecraft pathfinder in relevant environment, in AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition, AIAA SPACE Forum, San Diego, CA, 10-12 Sep 2013.
  7. Kluper DM, Spence HE, Larsen BA, Blake JB, Springer L, et al., FIREBIRD: a dual satellite mission to examine the spatial and energy coherence scales of radiation belt electron microbursts, in American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 14-18 Dec 2009.
  8. Lee J, Park SY, Kang DE, Relative navigation with intermittent laser-based measurement for satellite formation flying, J. Astron. Space Sci. 35, 163-173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2018.35.3.163
  9. Lee K, Oh H, Park HE, Park SY, Park C, Laser-based relative navigation using GPS measurements for spacecraft formation flying, J. Astron. Space Sci. 32, 387-393 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2015.32.4.387
  10. Lee K, Park C, Park SY, Performance analysis of generating function approach for optimal reconfiguration of formation flying, J. Astron. Space Sci. 30, 17-24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2013.30.1.017
  11. Lim HC, Bang HC, Park KD, Park PH, Tracking control design using sliding mode techniques for satellite formation flying, J. Astron. Space Sci. 20, 365-374 (2003). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2003.20.4.365
  12. Nanosats Database (2020) [Internet], viewed 2020 Jan 27, available from: http://www.nanosats.eu/
  13. NASA GSFC, General mission analysis tool (GMAT) (2017) [Internet], viewed 2020 Jan 27, available from: https://software.nasa.gov/software/GSC-17177-1
  14. Park HE, Park SY, Choi KH, Satellite formation reconfiguration and station keeping using state-dependent riccati equation technique, Aerospace Sci. Technol. 15, 440-452 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2010.09.007
  15. Park HE, Park SY, Kim SW, Park C, Integrated orbit and attitude hardware-in-the-loop simulations for autonomous satellite formation flying, Adv. Space Res. 52, 2052-2066 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.09.015
  16. Park HE, Park SY, Park C, Kim SW, Development of integrated orbit and attitude software-in-the-loop simulator for satellite formation flying, J. Astron. Space Sci. 30, 1-10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2013.30.1.001
  17. Yoo SM, Park SY, Determination of initial conditions for tetrahedral satellite formation, J. Astron. Space Sci. 28, 285-290 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2011.28.4.285
  18. Vallado DA, Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications. 4th ed. (Springer, Hawthorne, CA, 2013).
  19. Wen C, Zhao Y, Li B, Shi P, Solving the relative Lambert's problem and accounting for its singularities, Acta Astron. 97, 122-129 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.12.016