Wind and Structures

  • 제31권6호
  • /
  • Pages.523-532
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 1226-6116(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6225(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Combination coefficient of ESWLs of a high-rise building with an elliptical cross-section

  • Wang, Qinhua (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University) ;
  • Yu, Shuzhi (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University) ;
  • Ku, Chiujen (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University) ;
  • Garg, Ankit (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shantou University)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.19
  • 심사 : 2020.10.30
  • 발행 : 2020.12.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

As the height and flexibility of high-rise buildings increase, the wind loads become more dominant and the combination coefficient of Equivalent Static Wind Loads (ESWLs) should be considered when they are used in the structural design. In the first phase of the study, a brief introduction to the theory on the combination coefficient for high-rise buildings was given and then the time history of wind-induced responses of a 208-meter high-rise building with an elliptical cross-section was presented based on the wind tunnel test results for pressure measurement. The correlation between wind-induced responses was analyzed and the combination coefficients of ESWLs of the high-rise buildings using Turkstra's rule, and Asami's method, were calculated and compared with related design codes, e.g., AIJ-RLB, ASCE 7-10, and China Load Code for structural design. The results of the study showed that the combination coefficients from Asami's method are conservative compared with the other three methods. The results of this paper would be helpful to the wind-resistant design of high-rise buildings with elliptical cross-section.

키워드

과제정보

Guangdong Excellent Young Teachers Training Program (Yq2013071) financially supported the research. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are grateful to Prof. Yukio Tamura and unknown reviewers for providing many helpful comments and suggestions to revise the manuscript.

참고문헌

  1. AIJ-RLB (2015), AIJ recommendations for loads on buildings, Architectural Institute of Japan; Tokyo, Japan.
  2. AS/NZS (2011), Structural design actions Part 2: Wind actions, Council of Standards Australia, Council of Standards New Zealand, Australia/ New Zealand.
  3. Asami, Y. (2000), "Combination method for wind loads on high-rise buildings", Proceedings of the 16th National Symposium on Wind Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, August. (in Japanese)
  4. ASCE (2010), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, American Society of Civil Engineers
  5. Bartoli, G., Mannini, C. and Massai, T. (2011), "Quasi-static combination of wind loads: A copula-based approach", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 99(6), 672-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.01.022.
  6. Blaise, N. and Denoël, V. (2013), "Principal static wind loads", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 113, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.12.009.
  7. CCBFC/NBCC (2010), National building code of Canada, Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council of Canada; Ottawa, Canada.
  8. Chen, X. (2015), "Revisiting combination rules for estimating extremes of linearly combined correlated wind load effects", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 141, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.02.002.
  9. Chen, X. (2017), "Efficacy of Turkstra's combination rule for extremes of nonlinearly combined correlated wind load effects", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 170, 179-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.08.017.
  10. Chen, X. and Kareem, A. (2001), "Equivalent static wind loads for buffeting response of bridges", J. Struct. Eng., 127(12), 1467-1475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:12(1467).
  11. Davenport, A.G. (1967), "Gust loading factors", J. Struct. Div., 93(3), 11-34. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0001692
  12. GB50009-2012 (2012), Load code for the design of building structures, China Architecture & Building Press; Beijing, China.
  13. Holmes, J.D. (1988), "Distribution of peak wind loads on a low-rise building", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 29(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(88)90145-6.
  14. Kasperski, M. and Niemann, H.J. (1992), "The L.R.C. (load-response-correlation) - method a general method of estimating unfavourable wind load distributions for linear and non-linear structural behaviour", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 43(1-3), 1753-1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90588-2.
  15. Katsumura, A., Tamura, Y. and Nakamura, O. (2007), "Universal wind load distribution simultaneously reproducing largest load effects in all subject members on large-span cantilevered roof", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 95(9), 1145-1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.01.020.
  16. Kim, Y.C., Tamura, Y. and Kim, S. (2016), "Wind load combinations of atypical supertall buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 142(1), 04015103. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001359.
  17. Kwon, D.K. and Kareem, A. (2013), "Comparative study of major international wind codes and standards for wind effects on tall buildings", Eng. Struct., 51, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.008.
  18. Patruno, L., Ricci, M., Miranda, S.D. and Ubertini, F. (2017), "An efficient approach to the determination of equivalent static wind loads", J. Fluids Struct., 68, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.10.003.
  19. Rizzo, F. and Ricciardelli, F. (2017), "Design pressure coefficients for circular and elliptical plan structures with hyperbolic paraboloid roof", Eng. Struct., 139, 153-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.035.
  20. Simiu, E. and Scanlan, R.H. (1996), Wind Effects on Structures, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, U.S.A.
  21. Solari, G. and Pagnini, L.C. (1999), "Gust buffeting and aeroelastic behaviour of poles and monotubular towers", J. Fluids Struct., 13(7-8), 877-905. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfls.1999.0240.
  22. Tamura, Y., Kikuchi, H. and Hibi, K. (2003), "Quasi-static wind load combinations for low- and middle-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 91(12-15), 1613-1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.020.
  23. Tamura, Y., Kikuchi, H. and Hibi, K. (2008), "Peak normal stresses and effects of wind direction on wind load combinations for medium-rise buildings", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 96(6-7), 1043-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.027.
  24. Tamura, Y., Yong, C.K., Kikuchi, H. and Hibi, K. (2014), "Correlation and combination of wind force components and responses", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 125(125), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.11.015.
  25. Turkstra, C.J. (1970), Theory of Structural Safety. Technical Report, SM Study No.2, Solid Mechanics Division, Ontario, Canada.
  26. Wang, Q., Li, Z., Garg, A., Hazra, B. and Xie, Z. (2019), "Effects of tuned mass damper on correlation of wind-induced responses and combination coefficients of equivalent static wind loads of high-rise buildings", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 28(6), e1597. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1597.
  27. Wang, Q.H., W.D. Fu, S.Z. Yu, L. Allan, A. Garg and M. Gu (2018). "Mathematical model and case study of wind-induced responses for a vertical forest", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 179, 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2018.06.007
  28. Yeo, D.H. (2013), "Multiple points-in-time estimation of peak wind effects on structures", J. Struct. Eng., 139(3), 462-471. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000649.
  29. Zhou, Y. and Kareem, A. (2001), "Gust loading factor: New model", J. Struct. ng. 127(2), 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:2(168).
  30. Zhou, Y., Gu, M. and Xiang, H. (1999), "Alongwind static equivalent wind loads and responses of tall buildings. Part I: Unfavorable distributions of static equivalent wind loads", J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod., 79(1-2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00297-3

피인용 문헌

  1. Comparison of Dynamic Responses of Parallel-Placed Adjacent High-Rise Buildings under Wind and Earthquake Excitations vol.2021, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6644158