Journal of Nutrition and Health

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the factors influencing customer satisfaction of delivery food

배달음식 이용고객의 만족도에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석

  • Received : 2020.08.18
  • Accepted : 2020.11.11
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the importance and satisfaction of the selective attributes of delivery food and to analyze the factors affecting customer satisfaction. Methods: A total of 574 responses were collected from customers who had ordered delivery food for data analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS program (ver. 25.0) for frequency analysis, χ2 tests, t-test, factor analysis, Pearson correlation, multiple regression analysis, and Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA). Results: The importance of delivery food selection attributes was higher in the order of 'hygiene control level (4.72)', 'taste of food (4.64)', and 'delivery accuracy (4.40)'. Satisfaction assessment was higher in the order of 'taste of food (4.32)', 'delivery accuracy (4.26)', and 'convenience of using the delivery app (4.21)'. According to the results of IPA, items that were priorities for improvement were charges for delivery, discount offers, sufficient description of the menu, and rapid handling of customer complaints. On an average, overall customer satisfaction score of delivery food was 4.01 out of 5 points. Additionally, five satisfaction factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis. According to the results of multiple regression analysis, quality of delivery platform (p < 0.001), quality of delivery service (p < 0.001), convenience and diversity (p < 0.001), quality of delivery food (p < 0.001), and health and safety (p < 0.001) had significant positive effects on overall customer satisfaction. Conclusion: To increase customer satisfaction among delivery food customers, restaurant or delivery platform managers should consistently improve not only the quality of the delivery platform but also the quality of the delivery food and service.

배달음식 주문 경험이 있는 20-50대의 성인남녀를 대상으로 배달음식 제품과 서비스의 품질개선방안 마련을 위한 기초자료를 제공하기 위해 설문조사를 실시한 결과는 다음과 같다. 월1회 이상 배달음식을 주문한 총 574명의 설문을 통계분석했을 때, 배달음식 선택속성에 대한 중요도 평가점수는 '위생상태' (4.72점), '음식의 맛' (4.64점), '배달의 정확성' (4.40점) 순으로 높았고, 만족도 평가점수는 '음식의 맛' (4.32점), '배달의 정확성' (4.26점), '배달 어플의 이용 편리성' (4.21점) 순으로 높았다. 또한, IPA 결과 우선적으로 개선이 필요하다고 평가된 항목은 '배달비', '할인 혜택 제공', '충분한 메뉴 설명', '불만의 신속처리' 였다. 배달음식에 대한 전체적인 만족도 (5점 척도)는 평균 4.01점이었다. 배달음식 만족도 요인에 대한 요인 분석 결과 '배달 플랫폼의 품질', '배달서비스의 품질', '편의성과 다양성', '배달음식의 품질', '건강과 안전'의 5개 요인이 추출되었고, 배달음식에 대한 전체적인 만족도와 배달음식 만족도 요인, 연령, 배달음식 이용 빈도, 1인 1회 평균 구매 가격 간의 상관관계 분석 결과 전체적인 만족도와 배달음식 이용 빈도, 배달음식 만족도 요인 간에 유의적인 정 (+)의 상관관계를 나타냈다(p < 0.01). 배달음식 이용 고객의 전체적인 만족도에 미치는 영향 요인을 살펴보고자 다중회귀분석을 실시한 결과 배달음식 만족도 요인 5개 모두 전체적인 만족도에 유의적인 영향을 주는 것으로 분석되었다 (p < 0.001). 따라서 배달음식 이용 고객의 만족도 향상을 위해서는 배달 플랫폼의 품질뿐만 아니라 배달음식의 품질, 배달서비스의 품질, 편의성과 다양성, 건강과 안전 요인에 대해서 지속적인 개선이 필요하다고 판단된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Daegu University Undergraduate Research Program, 2020.

References

  1. Kwon JY, Kim SA, Park EG, Song JW. A study on the number of domestic food delivery services. Korean J Appl Stat 2015; 28(5): 977-990. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2015.28.5.977
  2. Park SH, Sin IS. The effect of food delivery service quality on customer satisfaction, perceived emotion, and intention to reuse. J Distrib Manag 2018; 21(4): 5-13.
  3. Song YE, Jeon SH, Jeon MS. The effect of mobile food delivery application usage factors on customer satisfaction and intention to reuse. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2017; 23(1): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.20878/CSHR.2017.23.1.005
  4. Kim HC, Kim MR. Analysis of the consumption behaviors and factors determining the use of delivery or take-out foods. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2019; 29(3): 168-179. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2019.6.29.3.168
  5. Heo SJ, Bae HJ. A survey on customers' perception of a hygiene grade certification system for restaurants. J Nutr Health 2020; 53(2): 203-214. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.2.203
  6. Korean Statistical Information Service. Report of online shopping survey in May 2020 [Internet]. Daejeon: KOSIS; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 31]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1KE10071&conn_path=I2&language=kr.
  7. Mirae Asset Daewoo. The age of delivery: the rise of the new distribution. Seoul: Mirae Asset Daewoo; 2018.
  8. Ko SH. Research on the consumer's delivery service quality perception and satisfaction in food service industry based on the types of food-related life-style. J Korea Contents Assoc 2014; 14(8): 406-415. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.406
  9. Yeo VC, Goh SK, Rezaei S. Consumer experiences, attitude, and behavioral intention toward online food deliver services. J Retail Consum Serv 2017; 35: 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.013
  10. Choi JH. The study on using delivery application belief, customer satisfaction and purchase intention by food related lifestyle of undergraduate students. Foodserv Ind J 2019; 15(2): 195-210. https://doi.org/10.22509/kfsa.2019.15.2.014
  11. Yusra Y, Agus A. The influence of online food delivery service quality on customer satisfaction and customer loyalty: the role of personal innovativeness. J Environ Treat Tech 2020; 8(1): 6-12.
  12. Kim YA, Lee BC, Youn H. A study on single people's satisfaction of convenience foods and repurchase intention according to food-related lifestyle. J Tourism Leis Res 2015; 27(1): 433-452.
  13. Jae MK, Jeon HR, Lee Y. Difference analysis of consumers for dietary life consumption behavior based on eating out and delivering or taking out food service. J Consum Cult 2017; 20(3): 27-50. https://doi.org/10.17053/jcc.2017.20.3.003
  14. Kim IH. Quality evaluation and utilization of nutrition information according to the dietary lifestyle of information users [dissertation]. Gyeongsan: Daegu University; 2019.
  15. Heo SJ, Bae HJ. Analysis of the consumption pattern of delivery food according to food-related lifestyle. J Nutr Health 2020; 53(5): 547-561. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.5.547
  16. Matzler K, Sauerwein E, Heischmidt K. Importance-performance analysis revisited: the role of the factor structure of customer satisfaction. Serv Ind J 2003; 23(2): 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060412331300912
  17. Zhang HQ, Chow I. Application of importance-performance model in tour guides performance: evidence from mainland Chinese outbound visitors in Hong Kong. Tour Manag 2004; 25(1): 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00064-5
  18. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis with reading. New York (NJ): Macmillan Publishing Company; 2006.
  19. Kim KS. Analysis of structural equation modeling. Seoul: Hannarae Publishing Company; 2007.
  20. Korea Rural Economic Institute. Statistical report on food consumption behavior survey. Naju: Korea Rural Economic Institute; 2019.
  21. Macromill Embrain. Perception survey on delivery food and delivery application. Seoul: Macromill Embrain; 2015.
  22. Yang MC. 'Corona 19 Staycation' surpassed 12 trillion won in online shopping in May...78% of delivery food [Internet]. Seoul: Kukminilbo; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 31]. Available from: http://news.kmib.co.kr/article/view.asp?arcid=0014762703.
  23. Seo KH. A study on food of behaviorism of use and selective attribution according to lifestyle [dissertation]. Seoul: Kwangwoon University; 2007.
  24. Ko YT. 95% of Koreans use smartphones...which country has the highest penetration rate? [Internet]. Seoul: KBS news; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 31]. Available from: https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/view.do?ncd=4135732.
  25. Lee HY. Delivery costs are rising vertically...Declares 'No delivery app' followed by customer complaints [Internet]. Seoul: enewstoday; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 31]. Available from: http://www.enewstoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=1360702.
  26. Hou Y, Yang W, Sun Y. Do pictures help? The effects of pictures and food names on menu evaluations. Int J Hosp Manag 2017; 60: 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.008
  27. Han SH. What influence do you have when choosing a 'delivery app' food? [Internet]. Seoul: Joodoilbo; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 31]. Available from: http://www.joongdo.co.kr/web/view.php?key=20190917010006834.
  28. Korean Consumer Agency. A survey on the customer problems of delivery service platforms(app). Eumseong: Korean Consumer Agency; 2019.
  29. Moon SS, Lim KR, Kang BN. A study on the effect of delivery service quality of customer satisfaction and brand image, customer loyalty: focusing on pizza restaurant. J Foodserv Manag 2009; 12(4): 393-413.
  30. Bae HJ, Boo G. Analysis on factors influencing foreign Chinese students' off-campus restaurant satisfaction. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 2015; 31(6): 749-755. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2015.31.6.749
  31. Kim HY, Ryu SH. Cognition and satisfaction of customer in home-delivered meal. Korean J Soc Food Cookery Sci 2003; 19(4): 529-538.
  32. Lee HD. Bamin, Introducing a new UI emphasizing the hygiene grade certification system in restaurants [Internet]. Seoul: etnews; 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 31]. Available from: https://www.etnews.com/20190724000138.
  33. Park JG. Theonebanchan: a Gunsan lunch box delivery store that does not use any chemical seasoning [Internet]. Seoul: DiscoveryNews; 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 31]. Available from: http://www.discoverynews.kr/sub_read.html?uid=50966§ion=sc40.
  34. Do KH. Development of food O2O service with foodtech. Ind Internet Issue Rep 2015; 11: 3-16.
  35. Choi MY, Lee JH. NHN and country delivery app handles to start breaking the Bamin 'Monopoly' [Internet]. Seoul: Hankyoreh; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 31]. Available from: http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/economy/it/954467.html.

Cited by

  1. 뉴스 데이터 마이닝을 통한 배달 플랫폼 참여자의 사회적 이슈 분석 vol.19, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2021.19.7.079