DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Field Application of Precast Concrete-panel Retaining Wall attached to In-Situ Ground Using Field Test and Numerical Analysis

현장시험 및 수치해석 분석을 통한 원지반 부착식 판넬옹벽의 현장 적용성 평가

  • Received : 2020.12.08
  • Accepted : 2020.12.14
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

Man-made slope is inevitable to make a new road, which may result in environmental problems as well as collapse of slope. To prevent these problems, various methods such as geogrid reinforced retaining wall, precast concrete-panel retaining wall, and so on, have been introduced and developed. Among these methods, this paper presents the evaluation of field application of precast concrete-panel retaining wall attached to in-situ ground (so called top-down) compared to the conventional construction method of precast concrete-panel retaining wall (so called bottom-up) through the field test and numerical analysis. As a result, the safety factor of both methods in final stage is similar, however, top-down method guarantees the slope stability during the construction compared to bottom-up method.

우리나라는 산지가 많은 지형적인 특성으로 교통의 편리를 위해 산지를 절취하여 변형시키는 공사가 매년 증가하고 있다. 특히 산지를 절치하여 변형시킬 경우 자연재해로 인한 사면 붕괴, 환경문제 등의 문제가 발생한다. 이러한 문제를 해결하고자 판넬식 옹벽, 보강토 옹벽 등의 다양한 보강공법이 있다. 하지만 Bottom-up방식의 경우 경사굴착으로 인한 추가 토공처리가 필요하며 되메움과 다짐불량에 의한 안정성 저하 등의 문제점을 지니고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 기존 Bottom-up방식의 문제점을 해결하기 위해 Top-down방식에 대해 현장 적용시험 및 수치해석을 통해 안정성 분석을 수행하였으며, 대표단면을 선정하여 Bottom-up방식과 Top-down방식에 대해 안정성 비교분석하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, S. H. (2013), A Study on the Stability Analysis of Earth Reinforcement Walls Constructed in the Cutting Faces, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Hongik.
  2. Han, J., Cho, S., Jeong, S., Lee, K., and Kim, J. (2005), Case Study on the Countermeasure Methods and Collapsed Sources of Segmental Retaining Wall Considering Site Conditions, Korean Geosynthetice Society, Vol.4, No.3, pp.35-43..
  3. Hong, G., You, S., Yun, J., Park, J., and Lee, K. (2016), A Case Study on Collapses and Restoration of Retaining Wall with Vegetated Concrete Block, Journal of Korea Geosynthetics Society, Vol.15, No.4, pp.105-115. https://doi.org/10.12814/jkgss.2016.15.4.105
  4. Kang, I., Ryu, J., Kim, H., and Kwon, Y. (2009), Reinforcement of Dilapidated Masonry and Concrete Retaining Walls Using Prefabricated Soil Nailing System, Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol.2009, No.4, pp.324-329.
  5. Kang, I., Kwon, Y., Park, S. Y., Ki, M., and Kim, H. (2008), Behavior Analysis of Assembling Soil Nailed Walls Through Large Scaled Load Test, Journal of the Korean GeoEnvironmental Society, Vol.9, No.4, pp.23-36.
  6. Kim, B., Yool, W., Kim, K., and Lee, B. (2006), A Case Study on Collapsed Geosynthetic Reinforced Segmental Retaining Wall, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial, Vol.14, No.4, pp.2006-2011.
  7. Kim, H., Lee, H., Kim. J., Ryu, J., and Sung, N. (2006), Behavioral Characteristics of Prestressed Earth Method Reinforced with Earth Bolt, KGS Spring Conference, Korean Geotechnical Society, pp. 662-669.
  8. Min, K., Lee, J., Lee, J., Kang, I., and Ahn, T. (2016), Field Application of a Precast Concrete-panel Retaining Wall Adhered to In-situ Ground, The Journal of Engineering Geology, Vol.26, No.1, pp.51-61. https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2016.1.51
  9. Shin, Y., Min, K, Kim, J., and Ahn, T. (2016), Behavior Characteristics of Precast Concrete-penel Retaining Wall Adherted to In-situ Groung Through Large Scaled Load Test, Journal of the Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol.17, No.11, pp.45-53. https://doi.org/10.14481/jkges.2016.17.11.45
  10. Won, M., Langcuyan, C. P., Choi, J., and Ha, Y. (2020), A Case Study on the Reinforcement of Existing Damaged Geogrid Reinforced Soil Wall Using Numerical Analyses, Korean Geosynthetics Society, Vol.19, Issue.1, pp.75-82.