Computers and Concrete

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bond behavior investigation of ordinary concrete-rebar with hinged beam test and eccentric pull-out test

  • Arslan, Mehmet E. (Department of Civil Engineering, Duzce University) ;
  • Pul, Selim (Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University)
  • Received : 2019.02.18
  • Accepted : 2020.12.09
  • Published : 2020.12.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, bond behavior of ordinary concrete and rebars with different diameters and development length was investigated by using Hinged Beam Test (HBT) and Eccentric Pull-Out Test (EPT) comparatively. For this purpose, three different rebar size and development length depending on rebar diameter were chosen as variables. Three specimens were produced for each series of specimens and totally 54 specimens were tested. At the end of the tests it was observed that obtained results for both tests were quite similar. On the other hand, increased bar size, especially for the specimen with 14 mm bar size and 14 development length (lb), caused shear failure of test specimens. This situation infers that when bigger bar size and lb are used in such test, dimensions of test specimens should be chosen bigger and stirrups should be used for producing of test specimens to obtain more adequate result by preventing shear failure. Also, a nonlinear regression analysis was employed between HBT and EPT results. There was a high correlation between the EPT values, lb, rebar diameters and estimated theoretical HBT. In addition, at the end of the study an equation was suggested to estimate bond strength for HBT by using EPT results.

Keywords

References

  1. Arezoumandi, M., Steele, A.R. and Volz, J.S. (2018), "Evaluation of the bond strengths between concrete and reinforcement as a function of recycled concrete aggregate replacement level", Struct., 16, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.08.012.
  2. Arslan, M.E. (2007), "Investigation of bond strength of structural lightweight aggregate concrete and ordinary concrete comparatively in bending", M.Sc. Dissertation, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon.
  3. Arslan, M.E. and Durmus, A. (2011), "Investigation of bond behavior between lightweight aggregate concrete and steel rebar using bending test", Comput. Concrete, 8(4), 465-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/cac.2011.8.4.465.
  4. Arslan, M.E. and Durmus, A. (2014), "Fuzzy logic approach for estimating bond behavior of lightweight concrete", Comput. Concrete, 14(3), 233-245. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2014.14.3.233
  5. EN 10080-2005 (2005), Steel for the Reinforcement of Concrete - Weldable Reinforcing Steel-General, European Standards.
  6. Ersoy, U. and O zcebe, G. (2001), Reinforced Concrete: Basic Principles, Calculation in accordance with TS-500-2000 and Turkish Seismic Code (1998), Evrim Pulishing, Istanbul, Turkey.
  7. Falope, F.O., Lanzoni, L. and Tarantino, A.M. (2018), "Modified hinged beam test on steel fabric reinforced cementitious matrix (SFRCM)", Compos. Part B: Eng., 146, 232-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.019.
  8. Hossain, K.M.A., Ametrano, D. and Lachemi, M. (2017), "Bond strength of GFRP bars in ultra-high strength concrete using RILEM beam tests", J. Build. Eng., 10, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2017.02.005.
  9. Ichinose, T., Kanayama, Y., Inoue, Y. and Bolander, J.E. (2004), "Size effect on bond strength of deformed bars", Constr. Build. Mater., 18(7), 549-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.03.014.
  10. Kabir, M.I., Shrestha, R. and Samali, B. (2016), "Effects of applied environmental conditions on the pull-out strengths of CFRP-concrete bond", Constr. Build. Mater., 114, 817-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.195.
  11. Kotynia, R., Szczech, D. and Kaszubska, M. (2017), "Bond behavior of GRFP bars to concrete in beam test", Procedia Eng., 193, 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.230.
  12. Lin, H. and Zhao, Y. (2016), "Effects of confinements on the bond strength between concrete and corroded steel bars", Constr. Build. Mater., 118, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.040.
  13. Lin, H., Zhao, Y., Ozbolt, J. and Reinhardt, H.W. (2017), "Bond strength evaluation of corroded steel bars via the surface crack width induced by reinforcement corrosion", Eng. Struct., 152, 506-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.051.
  14. Ozkal, F.M., Polat, M., Yagan, M. and Ozturk, M.O. (2018), "Mechanical properties and bond strength degradation of GFRP and steel rebars at elevated temperatures", Constr. Build. Mater., 184, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.203.
  15. Pandurangan, K., Dayanithy, A. and Prakash, S. (2016), "Influence of treatment methods on the bond strength of recycled aggregate concrete", Constr. Build. Mater., 120, 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.093.
  16. Wang, X.H., Chen, B. and Tang, P. (2018), "Experimental and analytical study on bond strength of normal uncoated and epoxycoated reinforcing bars", Constr. Build. Mater., 189, 612-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.010.
  17. Xiao, J., Hou, Y. and Huang, Z. (2014), "Beam test on bond behavior between high-grade rebar and high-strength concrete after elevated temperatures", Fire Saf. J., 69, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.07.001.
  18. Yang, H., Deng, Z. and Ingham, J.M. (2016) "Bond position function between corroded reinforcement and recycled aggregate concrete using beam tests", Constr. Build. Mater., 127, 518-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.008.
  19. Yeih, W., Chang, J.J. and Tsai, C.L. (2004), "Enhancement of the bond strength of epoxy coated steel by the addition of fly ash", Cement Concrete Compos., 26(4), 315-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00142-7.
  20. Zhang, X., Wu, Z., Zheng, J., Dong, W. and Bouchair, A. (2016), "Ultimate bond strength of plain round bars embedded in concrete subjected to uniform lateral tension", Constr. Build. Mater., 117, 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.029.