DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Biochar Application on Nitrous Oxide Emission in the Soil with Different Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer During Corn (Zea may) Cultivation

옥수수 재배지 아산화질소 배출에 대한 질소비료와 바이오차 시용 효과

  • Lee, Sun-il (Climate Change and Agroecology Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Gun-yeob (Climate Change and Agroecology Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Eun-jung (Climate Change and Agroecology Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Jong-sik (Climate Change and Agroecology Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Gwon, Hyo-Suk (Climate Change and Agroecology Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Shin, Joung-du (Climate Change and Agroecology Division, Department of Agricultural Environment, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
  • 이선일 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과) ;
  • 김건엽 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과) ;
  • 최은정 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과) ;
  • 이종식 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과) ;
  • 권효숙 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과) ;
  • 신중두 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과)
  • Received : 2020.09.14
  • Accepted : 2020.10.19
  • Published : 2020.12.31

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) from the soil is expected to depend on the types of nitrogen fertilizer used. Biochar has recently been proposed as a potential mitigation of climate change by reducing the N2O emission. Although laboratory studies reported that biochar applications could reduce N2O emission, the number of field-based studies is still limited. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of biochar on N2O emission when different nitrogen fertilizers were applied in corn cultivated field. METHODS AND RESULTS: The field experiment consisted of six treatments: urea fertilizer without biochar (U), ammonium sulfate fertilizer without biochar (A), oil cake fertilizer without biochar (O), urea fertilizer with biochar (U+B), ammonium sulfate fertilizer with biochar (A+B), and oil cake fertilizer with biochar (O+B). Biochar was applied at a rate of 10 t/ha. Greenhouse gas fluxes were measured during growing seasons using static vented chambers. The cumulative N2O emissions were 0.99 kg/ha in the U, 1.23 kg/ha in the A, 3.25 kg/ha in the O, 1.19 kg/ha in the U+B, 0.86 kg/ha in the A+B, and 1.55 kg/ha in the O+B. CONCLUSION: It was found that N2O emission was related to application of both nitrogen fertilizer type and biochar. In particular, the N2O reduction effect was the highest in the corn field incorporated with biochar when oil cake was applied to the soil.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhang Q, Chang J, Wang T, Xu Y (2007) Review of biomass pyrolysis oil properties and upgrading research. Energy Conversion and Management, 48(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.05.010.
  2. Breidenich C, Magraw D, Rowley A, Rubin JW (1998) The Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. The American Journal of International Law, 92(2), 315-331. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998044.
  3. Falkner R (2016) The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107-1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12708.
  4. Singh BP, Hatton BJ, Singh B, Cowie AL, Kathuria A (2010) Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39(4), 1224-1235. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0138.
  5. Roberts KG, Gloy BA, Joseph S, Scott NR, Lehmann J. (2010) Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: Estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 827-833. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902266r.
  6. Spokas KA (2010) Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O: C molar ratios. Carbon Management, 1(2), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.4155/cmt.10.32.
  7. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management, in: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds), Science and technology. pp. 1-12, Earthscan, London, UK. ISBN: 978-1-84407-658-1.
  8. van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Downie A, Morris S, Petty S, Rust J, Chan KY (2010) A glasshouse study on the interaction of low mineral ash biochar with nitrogen in a sandy soil. Soil Research, 48(7), 569-576. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR10003.
  9. Shaaban M, Peng QA, Hu R, Wu Y, Lin S, Zhao J (2015) Dolomite application to acidic soils: a promising option for mitigating N2O emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(24), 19961-19970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5238-4.
  10. Oo AZ, Sudo S, Akiyama H, Win KT, Shibata A, Yamamoto A, Hirono Y (2018) Effect of dolomite and biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from acidic tea field soil. PloS One, 13(2), e0192235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192235.
  11. Lee SI, Kim GY, Choi EJ, Lee JS, Jung HC (2017) Decreases nitrous oxide emission and increase soil carbon via carbonized biomass application of orchard soil. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 36(2), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2017.36.2.13.
  12. El-Naggar A, Usman AR, Al-Omran A, Ok YS, Ahmad M, Al-Wabel MI (2015) Carbon mineralization and nutrient availability in calcareous sandy soils amended with woody waste biochar. Chemosphere, 138, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.05.052.
  13. El-Naggar A, Awad YM, Tang XY, Liu C, Niazi NK, Jien SH, Lee SS (2018) Biochar influences soil carbon pools and facilitates interactions with soil: A field investigation. Land Degradation & Development, 29, 2162-2171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2896.
  14. Xu Y, Seshadri B, Sarkar B, Rumpel C, Sparks DS, Bolan N (2018) Microbial control of soil carbon turnover, in: Nannipieri P, Hernandez T (eds.), The future of soil carbon. pp. 165-194, Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811687-6.00006-7.
  15. Baggs EM (2011) Soil microbial sources of nitrous oxide: recent advances in knowledge, emerging challenges and future direction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2011.08.011.
  16. Sistani KR, Jn-Baptiste M, Lovanh N, Cook KL (2011) Atmospheric emissions of nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide from different nitrogen fertilizers. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40, 1797-1805. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0197.
  17. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle size analysis. Physical and mineralogical methods. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, 383-412.
  18. National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (2000) Methods of soil and plant analysis, pp. 103-131, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Korea.
  19. McLaughlin H, Anderson PS, Shields FE, Reed TB (2009) All biochars are not created equal, and how to tell them apart. In Proceedings, North American Biochar Conference, pp. 1-36, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  20. Hutchinson GL, Livingston GP (1993) Use of chamber systems to measure trace gas fluxes. Agricultural ecosystem effects on trace gases and global climate change. Agriculturaleco, 55, 63-78. https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub55.c4.
  21. Yagi K (1991) Emission of biogenic gas compounds from soil ecosystem and effect of global environment, in: 2. Methane emission from paddy fields. Soil and Fertilizer Japan, 62(5), 556-562.
  22. Major J, Steiner C, Downie A, Lehmann J (2009) Biochar effects on nutrient leaching, in: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds.), Science and technology, pp. 67-84, Earthscan, London, UK.
  23. Lee SI, Kim GY, Choi EJ, Lee JS, Jung HC (2018) Reduction of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions through various biochars application in the upland. Journal of the Korea Organic Resources Recycling Association, 26(2), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.17137/korrae.2018.26.2.11.
  24. Shinogi Y, Kanri Y (2003) Pyrolysis of plant, animal and human waste: physical and chemical characterization of the pyrolytic products. Bioresource Technology, 90, 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00147-0.
  25. Nichols GJ, Cripps JA, Collinson ME, Scott AD (2000) Experiments in waterlogging and sedimentology of charcoal: Results and implications. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, 164, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(00)00174-7.
  26. Ascough PL, Sturrock CJ, Bird MI (2010) Investigation of growth responses in saprophytic fungi to charred biomass. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 46, 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010903388436.
  27. Liu X, Zheng J, Zhang D, Cheng K, Zhou H, Zhang A, Kuzyakov Y (2016) Biochar has no effect on soil respiration across Chinese agricultural soils. Science of the Total Environment, 554, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.179.
  28. Chantigny MH, Rochette P, Angers DA, Bittman S, Buckley K, Masse D. Gasser MO (2010) Soil nitrous oxide emissions following band-incorporation of fertilizer nitrogen and swine manure. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 1545-1553. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0482.
  29. Hayakawa A, Akiyama H, Sudo S, Yagi K (2009) N2O and NO emissions from an Andisol field as influenced by pelleted poultry manure. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 41, 521-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.011.
  30. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, 403-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5.
  31. Uchida Y, Moriizumi M, Shimotsuma M (2019) Effects of rice husk biochar and soil moisture on the accumulation of organic and inorganic nitrogen and nitrous oxide emissions during the decomposition of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) mulch. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 65, 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2019.1624139.
  32. Cui Z, Yue S, Wang G, Meng Q, Wu L, Yang Z, Chen X (2013) Closing the yield gap could reduce projected greenhouse gas emissions: a case study of maize production in China. Global Change Biology, 19(8), 2467-2477. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12213.