한국산림과학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science)

  • 제109권4호
  • /
  • Pages.446-453
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2586-6613(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-6621(eISSN)
한국산림과학회 (Korean Society of Forest Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사방댐 대상지 선정 기준마련을 위한 AHP 분석기법의 적용

The Application of the AHP Analysis Method to Prepare the Selection Standards for the Target Site of Check Dams

  • 배현석 (사방협회 연구조사처) ;
  • 이광연 (사방협회 연구조사처) ;
  • 최영진 (사방협회 연구조사처) ;
  • 이진호 (사방협회 연구조사처) ;
  • 우충식 (국립산림과학원 산림방재연구과) ;
  • 전근우 (강원대학교 산림자원학과)
  • Bea, Hyun-Seok (Division of Research and Survey, Korean Association of Soil and Water Conservation) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Youn (Division of Research and Survey, Korean Association of Soil and Water Conservation) ;
  • Choi, Young-Jin (Division of Research and Survey, Korean Association of Soil and Water Conservation) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Ho (Division of Research and Survey, Korean Association of Soil and Water Conservation) ;
  • Woo, Choong-Shik (Division of Forest Disaster Management, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Chun, Kun-Woo (Department of Forest Resources, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2020.09.15
  • 심사 : 2020.10.19
  • 발행 : 2020.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) 분석기법을 활용하여 사방댐 대상지 선정과 관련된 인자의 중요도를 정량적으로 산정하고, 이를 시범 적용함으로써 사방댐 대상지 선정과 관련된 기초자료를 제시하고자 하였다. AHP 분석을 위해 평가항목 및 평가인자를 구분한 결과 평가항목은 3개(위험성, 취약성 및 시공성), 평가인자는 총 12개(위험성 10개, 취약성 및 시공성 각 1개), 평가기준은 평가인자별 2~6개로 선정되었다. 선정된 평가항목, 평가인자 및 평가기준별 중요도를 활용하여 평가기준별 상대적 중요도를 산출한 결과, 취약성 항목인 의료시설, 노유자시설, 교육시설 및 민가 등이 타 항목보다 높게 나타났다. 사방댐 타당성평가 적격 판정지역의 중요도를 강원도 내 사방댐 미설치유역 24,431개소에 적용한 결과, 사방댐 배치가 가능한 산림유역은 전체 산림유역의 35.2%에 해당하는 8,601개소로 나타났다.

By applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) method, we calculated the weight of factors related to the selection of check dam sites and generated basic data related to the selection of the target site. As a result of the AHP classification, three evaluation items(Susceptibility, Vulnerability, and Constructability), 12 evaluation factors (Susceptibility 10, Vulnerability, and Constructability 1), and two-six evaluation criteria in each evaluation factor were selected. After calculating the relative importance by using the selected evaluation items, evaluation factors, and criteria, the vulnerability items such as medical facilities, facilities for the aged, educational facilities, and private homes were found to be higher than the other items. When the relative weight for deciding qualified sites was applied to the forest watersheds in the Gangwon region, 8,601 forest watersheds(35.2 % of the total forest watersheds) were found to be suitable for the installation of check dams.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bang, H.S., Kweon, H.K., Lee, J.W. and Kim, M.J. 2014. A study on classification of disaster risk rating for forest road using AHP methodology. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 103(2): 258-263. https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2014.103.2.258
  2. Chae, K.J. and Kim, O.I. 2010. A study on the priority analysis of strategies to forest policy. Journal of Government and Policy 2(2): 109-126.
  3. Choi, H.S., Lee, C.W., Kim, K.H., Youn, H.J. and Kim, G.Y. 2013. Developing the humanity and social risk index for landslide disasters in city. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 13(5): 203-210. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.5.203
  4. Choi, J.R., Kim, G.W., Jee, Y.K. and Park, I.C. 2015. Development and application of precise debris-flow risk assessment index in urban area. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 15(3): 107-113. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.3.107
  5. Chung, J.S., Lee, B.D. and Lee, S.K. 2002. Development of a forestland slope interpretation module for predicting landslide hazards. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 91(1): 34-41.
  6. Hong, J.M. 2011. An AHP approach for the importance weight of renewable energy investment criterion in the private sector. Korea Energy Economic Review 10(1): 115-142.
  7. Im, I.S., Lee, K.H. and Kim, D.G. 2014. Watershed characteristics of the proposed site installation Gyeongbuk debris barrier. Journal of the Korean Society of Forest Engineering 12(2): 104-116.
  8. Jung, K.W., Park, S.J. and Lee, C.W. 2008. Development of the score table for prediction of landslide hazard: A case study of Gyeongsangbuk-do province. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 97(3): 332-339.
  9. Kang, M.J., Kim, K.D., Oh, K.S., Park, J.W. and Park, J.H. 2016. Analysis of forest environmental factors on torrent erosion control work area in Gyeongsangnam-do: Focus on erosion control dam and stream conservation. Journal of Agriculture & Life Science 50(5): 111-120. https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2016.50.5.111
  10. Kang, W.P., Murai, H., Omura, H. and Ma, H.S. 1986. On the determination of slope stability to landslide by quantification(II). Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 75(1): 32-37.
  11. Korea Forest Service. 2018. Master plan for erosion control work. pp. 82.
  12. Korea Forest Service. 2019. Stastical Yearbook of Forestry. pp. 448.
  13. Kim, J.Y. 2009. A study on the policy and situation of sediment check dams: Case of Gangwon Province, Korea. Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association 16(4): 131-144.
  14. Kim, K.N. and Jang, S.J. 2014. Development of criteria for zonning of debris flow hazard area. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 14(6): 177-183. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.6.177
  15. Kim, S.W., Chun, K.W., Kim, K.N., Kim, M.S., Kim, M.S., Lee, S.H. and Seo, J.I. 2013. Significance and future direction for designation and management of landslide prone zones. Journal of Forest Environmental Science 29(3): 237-248. https://doi.org/10.7747/JFS.2013.29.3.237
  16. Lee, J.Y., Ju, H.J. and No, J.Y. 2010. Research on priority of forest values based on AHP. The Journal of Korean Policy Studies 10(3): 301-317.
  17. Lee, K.Y., Kim, K.N., Jang, J.W. and Chun, K.W. 2017. On analyzing the topography of shallow Failure: On the Mt. Umyeon. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 17(3): 173-181. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2017.17.3.173
  18. Lee, S.S. 2010. A study on drainage facilities in mountainous urban neighborhood parks: The cases of Baebongsan park and Ogeum park in Seoul. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(5): 80-92.
  19. Park, S.J., Lee, J.W., Choi, Y.H., Kim, M.J., Kweon, H.K., and Jeon, Y.J. 2010. A study on location condition for erosion Control Dam: Focus on chungcheong region and Kyeongsangbuk-do. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 37(2): 223-229. https://doi.org/10.7744/CNUJAS.2010.37.2.223
  20. Park, J.H., Ji, B.Y., Hwang, J.S., Oh, J.H., Jung, D.H. and Cha, D.S. 2013. Study on the allocation method for forest road network using GIS. Journal of the Association of Korean Photo-Geographers 23(4): 1-11.
  21. Park, J.W., Cho, S.W., Jung, G.H., Kim, B.M., Woo, H.S., and Lee, Y.H. 2020. Development of forest thinning evaluation factors using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 109(3): 350-360. https://doi.org/10.14578/JKFS.2020.109.3.350
  22. Park, S.H., Jung, H.K. and Seok, H.D. 2013. Policy priority in long-term forest management: Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Korean Jounal of Forest Economics 20(1): 13-24.
  23. Park. J.H. 2011. Rapid increase in the change of the target site of the check dam. http://www.geojejournal.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=3447.
  24. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport. 2007. Road design manual of mountain area. pp. 162.
  25. Saaty, T.L. 1988. What is the analytic hierarchy process?. Mathematical models for decision support, NATO ASI Series F48: 109-133.
  26. Saaty, T.L. 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48(1): 9-26 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  27. Woo, C.S., Kwon, H.J., Lee, C.W. and Kim, K.H. 2014 Landslide hazard prediction map based on logistic regression model for applying in the whole country of South Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation 14(6): 117-123. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.6.117