Journal of Engineering Education Research (공학교육연구)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of the ENACT Model for Cultivating Social Responsibility of College Students in STEM Fields

이공계 대학생의 사회적 책임감 함양을 위한 ENACT 모형의 개발과 교육적 함의

  • Lee, Hyunju (Department of Science Education, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Choi, Yuhyun (Department of Technology Education, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Nam, Chang-Hoon (Department of New Biology, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Technology) ;
  • Ok, Seung-Yong (School of Social Safety System Engineering, Hankyong National University) ;
  • Shim, Sungok Serena (Department of Educational Psychology, Ball State University) ;
  • Hwang, Yohan (Center for Educational Research, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Gahyoung (Research Center for Hazard Literacy Education, Ewha Womans University)
  • 이현주 (이화여자대학교 과학교육과) ;
  • 최유현 (충남대학교 기술교육과) ;
  • 남창훈 (대구경북과학기술원 뉴바이올로지 전공) ;
  • 옥승용 (한경대학교 사회안전시스템공학부) ;
  • 심성옥 (볼주립대학교 교육심리학과) ;
  • 황요한 (서울대학교 교육종합연구원) ;
  • 김가형 (이화여자대학교 해저드리터러시 융합교육연구소)
  • Received : 2020.08.28
  • Accepted : 2020.10.11
  • Published : 2020.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to introduce the ENACT model, which is a systematic teaching-learning model for cultivating social responsibility of science and engineering college students, and to discuss its educational implications. For the development of the ENACT model, we conducted extensive literature reviews on RRI, STEM education, and science and technology studies (STS). In addition, we examined exemplary overseas education programs emphasizing social responsibility of scientists/engineers and citizens. The ENACT model consists of five steps; 1) Engage in SSIs, 2) Navigate SSIs, 3) Anticipate consequences, 4) Conduct scientific and engineering practice, and 5) Take action. This model links Socioscientific Issues (SSI) education with engineering education, dividing the major elements of social responsibility education for scientists and engineers into the dimensions of epistemology and praxis, and reflected them in the model. This effort enables science and engineering college students to pursue more responsible and sustainable development by carrying out the responsible problem-solving process based on an understanding of the nature of science and technology. We plan to implement ENACT model based programs for science and engineering college students and to examine the effects.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2019년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2019S1A5A2A03041635)

References

  1. 김가형.이현주(2019). 블록체인을 활용한 적정기술에 대한 청소년 과학캠프 참여를 통한 이공계 대학(원)생과 과학기술자의 교육경험 탐색. 교과교육학연구, 23(3), 251-263.
  2. 김영재(2019). 과학기술인력의 사회참여인식에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 미국 나노과학자 사례를 중심으로. 한국인사행정학회보, 18(4), 33-53.
  3. 박희제.성지은(2015). 더 나은 사회를 위한 과학을 향하여: 사회에 책임지는 연구혁신(RRI) 의 현황과 함의. 과학기술학연구, 15(2), 99-133.
  4. 손화철.송성수(2007). 공학윤리와 전문직 교육: 미시적 접근에서 거시적 접근으로. 철학, 91, 305-331.
  5. 송성수(2008). 과학기술자의 사회적 책임에 관한 논의의 재검토. 공학교육연구, 11(2), 5-14.
  6. 안윤정.임윤서(2017). 4차 산업혁명에 대한 대학생 인식과 진로교육의 방향모색. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 17(18), 329-351.
  7. 유양석(2019). 4차 산업혁명의 사회적 문제에 대한 대학생의 인식과 준비 여부. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 19(3), 566-575. https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2019.19.03.566
  8. 이현옥.이현주(2016). 대학생들의 과학기술관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 논의에서 기술의 본성(NOT) 은 어떻게 나타나는가?. 한국과학교육학회지, 36(2), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0303
  9. 이현주(2018). SSI 교육이란 무엇인가. 서울: 박영스토리.
  10. 장용철.김건국.김민철(2013). 창의설계입문의 PBL(Problem-Based Learning) 적용: 충남대학교 환경공학분야 사례. 공학교육연구, 16(2), 78-85.
  11. 정무권(2012). 위험사회론과 사회적 위험의 역동성: 사회적 위험의 거시적 연구를 위한 비판적 검토. 한국사회와행정연구, 23(2), 195-224.
  12. 한경희 외(2012). 공학 분야의 윤리적 문제해결방법: 매트릭스 가이드. 공학교육연구, 15(1), 61-71.
  13. 홍찬숙(2011). 루만과 벡의 근대성 이론 비교: 자기대면 (reflexivity) 개념과 주체의 문제를 중심으로. 사회와이론, 19, 47-87.
  14. Barnett, R.(2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
  15. Bencze, L.(2017). Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments: STEPWISE. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  16. Bencze, L. & Krstovic, M.(2017). Science students' ethical technology designs as solutions to socio-scientific problems. In L. Bencze (Ed.), Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments (pp. 201-226). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  17. Bielefeldt, A. R.(2018). Professional social responsibility in engineering. In I. Muenstermann (Ed.), Social responsibility (pp. 41-60). London, UK: IntechOpen.
  18. Biswas, W. K.(2012). The importance of industrial ecology in engineering education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371211211818
  19. Burdinger, F. B. & Burdinger, M. D.(2006). Ethics of emerging technologies. Wiley: John Wiley & Sons, INC.
  20. Canney, N. & Bielefeldt, A.(2015). A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1B), 414-424.
  21. Clough, M. P.(2013). Teaching about the nature of technology: Issues and pedagogical practices. In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.). The nature of technology: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 345-369). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
  22. Colucci-Gray, L., Giuseppe Barbiero, E.C. & Gray, D.(2006). From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education. Science Education, 90, 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20109
  23. Davis, M.(1999). Ethics and the university. London and New York: Routledge.
  24. De Vries, J. & De Vries, M.(2006). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers (Vol. 27). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  25. Enelund, M. et al.(2013). Integration of education for sustainable development in the mechanical engineering curriculum. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 51-62.
  26. Gorghiu, G., Anghel, G. A. & Ion, R. M.(2015). Students' perception related to a responsible research and innovation demarche. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 600-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.166
  27. Hughes, T. P.(2012). The evolution of large technological systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, T. J. Pinch, & D. G. Douglas (Eds.). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 45-74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  28. Kahn, S. & Zeidler, D. L.(2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking in support of socioscientific reasoning. Science & Education, 28(6-7), 605-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00044-2
  29. Kim, G., Ko, Y. & Lee, H.(2020). The effects of community-based socioscientific issues program (SSI-COMM) on promoting students' sense of place and character as citizens. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09976-1
  30. Kruse, J. W.(2013). Implications of the nature of technology for teaching and teacher education. In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.). The nature of technology: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 345-369). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
  31. Lambrinidou, Y. & Canney, N. E.(2017, June). Engineers' imaginaries of "the public": Content analysis of foundational professional documents. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Columbus, OH.
  32. Lee, H. et al.(2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
  33. Levrini, O. et al.(2019). Developing future-scaffolding skills through science education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2647-2674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1693080
  34. Lundstrom, M., Sjostrom, J. & Hasslof, H.(2017). Responsible research and innovation in science education: The solution or the emperor's new clothes?. Sisyphus: Journal of Education, 5(3), 11-27.
  35. Schinzinger, R. & Martin, M. W.(2000). Introduction to engineering ethics. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  36. Mejlgaard, N. et al.(2019). Teaching responsible research and innovation: A phronetic perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(2), 597-615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0029-1
  37. Morgan, A.(2011). Place-based education versus geography education? In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 84-108). New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  38. Mueller, M. P. & Zeidler, D. L.(2010). Moral-ethical character and science education: Ecojustice ethics through socioscientific issues (SSI). In D. J. Tippins, et al. (Eds.), Cultural studies and environmentalism (pp. 105-128). Springer, Dordrecht.
  39. Newton, M. H. & Zeidler, D. L.(2020). Developing socioscientific perspective taking. International Journal of Science Education, 1-18.
  40. Nye, D. E.(2006). Technology matters: Questions to live with. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  41. Okada, A.(2016). Engaging science: Innovative teaching for responsible citizenship. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.
  42. Owen, R. et al.(2013). A framework for responsible innovation. In R. Owen, J. Bessant, & M. Heintz. (Eds.), Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 27-50). West Sussex: Wiley.
  43. Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. & Scott, B.(2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific Inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
  44. Scheufele, D. A. & Lewenstein, B. V.(2005). The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(6), 659-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2
  45. Schlossberger, E.(2016). Engineering codes of ethics and the duty to set a moral precedent. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1333-1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9708-3
  46. Schumacher, E.(1973). Small is beautiful: A study of ecomonics as if people mattered. New York, NY: Vintage.
  47. Sjostrom, J. & Eilks, I.(2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. J.Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 65-88). Dordrecht: Springer.
  48. Smith, G. A. & Williams, D. R.(1999). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  49. Stahl, B. C.(2013). Responsible research and innovation: The role of privacy in an emerging framework. Science and Public Policy, 40, 708-716. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct067
  50. Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J. & Wilsdon, J.(2014). Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513518154
  51. Stilgoe, J., Owen R. & Macnagthen, P.(2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42, 1568-1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
  52. Tassone, V. C. et al.(2018). (Re-)Designing higher education curricula in times of systemic dysfunction: A responsible research and innovation perspective. Higher Education, 76, 337-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0211-4
  53. Valdivia, W. D. & Guston, D. H.(2015), Responsible innovation: A primer for policymakers. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
  54. Volti, R.(2009). Society and technological change. New York, NY: Worth.
  55. Von Schomberg, R.(2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, & J. Bessant (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society (pp. 51-74). London: John Wiley.
  56. Waight, N. & Abd-El-Khalick, F.(2012). Nature of technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2875-2905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.698763
  57. Wals, A. E. J. et al.(2016). Learning for walking the change: Eco-social innovation through sustainability-oriented higher education. In M. Barth. et al. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of higher education for sustainable development (pp. 25-39). London, UK: Routledge.
  58. Wyndham, J. M. et al.(2015). Social responsibility: A preliminary inquiry into the perspectives of scientists, engineers and health professionals. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  59. Zafrani, E. & Yarden, A.(2017). Becoming a science activist: A case study of students' engagement in a socioscientific project. Sisyphus-Journal of Education, 5(3), 44-67.
  60. Zandvoort, H. et al.(2013). Editors' overview perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 1413-1438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9495-7
  61. Zeidler, D. L. et al.(2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048