Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences

The Korean Space Science Society (한국우주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Analysis of M-ary Optical Communication over Log-Normal Fading Channels for CubeSat Platforms

  • Received : 2020.10.07
  • Accepted : 2020.11.16
  • Published : 2020.12.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A CubeSat platform has become a popular choice due to inexpensive commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components and low launch cost. However, it requires more power-efficient and higher-data rate downlink capability for space applications related to remote sensing. In addition, the platform is limited by the size, weight and power (SWaP) constraints as well as the regulatory issue of licensing the radio frequency (RF) spectrum. The requirements and limitations have put optical communications on promising alternatives to RF communications for a CubeSat platform, owing to the power efficiency and high data rate as well as the license free spectrum. In this study, we analyzed the performance of optical downlink communications compatible with CubeSat platforms in terms of data rate, bit error rate (BER) and outage probability. Mathematical models of BER and outage probability were derived based on not only the log-normal model of atmospheric turbulence but also a transmitter with a finite extinction ratio. Given the fixed slot width, the optimal guard time and modulation orders were chosen to achieve the target data rate. And the two performance metrics, BER and outage data rate, were analyzed and discussed with respect to beam divergence angle, scintillation index and zenith angle.

Keywords

References

  1. Carrasco-Casado A, Biswas A, Fields R, Grefenstette B, Harrison F, et al., Optical communication on CubeSats: Enabling the next era in space science, Proceeding of 2017 International Conference on Space Optical Systems and Applications, Okinawa, Japan, 14-16 Nov 2017.
  2. Clements E, Aniceto R, Barnes D, Caplan D, Clark J, et al., Nanosatellite optical downlink experiment: design, simulation, and prototyping, Opt. Eng. 55, 111610 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.55.11.111610
  3. Davoli F, Kourogiorgas C, Marchese M, Panagopoulos A, Patrone F, Small satellites and CubeSats: Survey of structures, architectures, and protocols, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw. 37, 1-17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/sat.1277
  4. Degnan JJ, Millimeter accuracy satellite laser ranging: a review, Geodynamics. 25, 133-162 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1029/GD025p0133
  5. Devaraj K, Kingsbury R, Ligon M, Breu J, Vittaldev V, et al., Dove high speed downlink system, Proceedings of the 31th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 5-10 Jul 2017.
  6. Ghassemlooy Z, Popoola W, Rajbhandari S, Optical Wireless Communications: System and Channel Modelling with MATLAB (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2018).
  7. Hemmati H, Near-Earth Laser Communications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009).
  8. Johnson SE, Effect of target surface orientation on the range precision of laser detection and ranging systems, J. Appl. Remote Sens. 3, 033564 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3271047
  9. Kaushal H, Kaddoum G, Optical communication in space: Challenges and mitigation techniques, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19, 57-96 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2603518
  10. Kiasaleh K, Performance of APD-based, PPM free-space optical communication systems in atmospheric turbulence, IEEE Trans. Commun. 53, 1455-1461 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2005.855009
  11. Kingsbury RW, Optical communications for small satellites, PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015).
  12. Klein BJ, Degnan JJ, Optical antenna gain. 1: Transmitting antennas, Appl. Opt. 13, 2134-2141 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.13.002134
  13. Lim HC, Kucharski D, Kim S, Choi CS, Sung KP, et al., Evaluation of a Geiger-mode imaging flash lidar in the approach phase for autonomous safe landing on the Moon, Adv. Space Res. 63, 1122-1132 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.10.028
  14. Lim HC, Park JU, Choi M, Choi CS, Choi JD, et al., Performance analysis of DPSK optical communication for LEO-to-ground relay link via a GEO satellite, J. Astron. Space Sci. 37, 11-18 (2020a). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2020.37.1.11
  15. Lim HC, Sung KP, Yu SY, Choi M, Park E, et al., Satellite laser ranging system at Geochang station, J. Astron. Space Sci. 35, 253-261 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2018.35.4.253
  16. Lim HC, Zhang ZP, Sung KP, Park JU, Kim S, et al., Modeling and analysis of an echo laser pulse waveform for the orientation determination of space debris, Remote Sens. 12, 1659 (2020b). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101659
  17. Pham HTT, Dang NT, Pham AT, Effects of atmospheric turbulence and misalignment fading on performance of serial-relaying M-ary pulse-position modulation free-space optical systems with partially coherent Gaussian beam, IET Commun. 8, 1762-1768 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1049/ietcom.2013.0721
  18. Rose TS, Rowen DW, Lalumondiere SD, Werner NI, Linares R, et al., Optical communications downlink from a low-earth orbiting 1.5U CubeSat, Opt. Express. 27, 24382-24392 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.024382
  19. Shen H, Yu L, Fan C, Temporal spectrum of atmospheric scintillation and the effects of aperture averaging and time averaging, Opt. Commun. 330, 160-164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTCOM.2014.05.039
  20. Tanaka T, Kawamura Y, Tanaka T, Development and operations of nano-satellite FITSAT-1 (NIWAKA), Acta Astronaut. 107, 112-129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.10.023
  21. Villela T, Costa CA, Brandão AM, Bueno FT, Leonardi R, Towards the thousandth CubeSat: A statistical overview, Int. J. Aerosp Eng. 2019, 5063145(2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5063145