대한건축학회논문집:구조계 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction)

  • 제35권11호
  • /
  • Pages.155-162
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1226-9107(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1788(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

에이다 부스트를 활용한 건설현장 추락재해의 강도 예측과 영향요인 분석

Analysis of Occupational Injury and Feature Importance of Fall Accidents on the Construction Sites using Adaboost

  • 최재현 (한국기술교육대학교 디자인.건축공학부) ;
  • 류한국 (삼육대학교 건축학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.03
  • 심사 : 2019.11.13
  • 발행 : 2019.11.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The construction industry is the highest safety accident causing industry as 28.55% portion of all industries' accidents in Korea. In particular, falling is the highest accidents type composed of 60.16% among the construction field accidents. Therefore, we analyzed the factors of major disaster affecting the fall accident and then derived feature importances by considering various variables. We used data collected from Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency (KOSHA) for learning and predicting in the proposed model. We have an effort to predict the degree of occupational fall accidents by using the machine learning model, i.e., Adaboost, short for Adaptive Boosting. Adaboost is a machine learning meta-algorithm which can be used in conjunction with many other types of learning algorithms to improve performance. Decision trees were combined with AdaBoost in this model to predict and classify the degree of occupational fall accidents. HyOperpt was also used to optimize hyperparameters and to combine k-fold cross validation by hierarchy. We extracted and analyzed feature importances and affecting fall disaster by permutation technique. In this study, we verified the degree of fall accidents with predictive accuracy. The machine learning model was also confirmed to be applicable to the safety accident analysis in construction site. In the future, if the safety accident data is accumulated automatically in the network system using IoT(Internet of things) technology in real time in the construction site, it will be possible to analyze the factors and types of accidents according to the site conditions from the real time data.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국연구재단

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Employment and Labor. (2017). Analysis of the Status of Occupational Accidents- Focusing on Occupational Accidents by Industrial Accident Compensation Law.
  2. Choi, S. D., & Carlson, K. (2014). Occupational safety issues in residential construction surveyed in Wisconsin. United States. Industrial health, 52(6), 541-547. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2014-0008
  3. Liao, C. W., & Perng, Y. H. (2008). Data mining for occupational injuries in the Taiwan construction industry. Safety Science, 46, 1091-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.007
  4. Kim, E. J. (2018). Analysis on the Factors of Construction Disaster Applying the AHP. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea, 20(1), 197-204.
  5. Shin, W. S., & Son, C. B. (2018). An Analysis on the Accident Influence Factor and Severity of Construction General Workers. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 34(3), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_SC.2018.34.3.69
  6. Gillen, M. (1999). Injuries from construction falls: functional limitations and return to work. The American Association of Occupational Health Nurses, 47(2), 65-73.
  7. Bunn, T. L., Slavova, S., & Bathke, A. (2007). Data Linkages of inpatient hospitalization and workers' claims data sets to characterize occupational falls. Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association. 105(7), 313-320.
  8. You, H. J., Yoo, Y. T., & Kang, K. S. (2017). On-Site Safety Management System in Construction Projects A Study on Improvement of efficiency apartment. Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science, 19(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2017.19.1.87
  9. Unsar, S., & Sut, N. (2009) General assessment of the occupational accidents that occurred in Turkey between the years 2000 and 2005. Safety Science, 47, 614-619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.08.001
  10. Lee, D. H. (2017). The state and analysis of construction workers' grave industrial accident based on human dignity. Kyungpook National University Law Journal, 57, 169-198. https://doi.org/10.17248/knulaw..57.201702.169
  11. Forteza, F. J., Carretero-Gomez, J. M., & Sese, A. (2017). Occupational risk, accidents on sites and economic performance of construction firms. Safety Science, 94, 61-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.01.003
  12. Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont, Califonia: Wadsworth Inc.
  13. Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.
  14. Geron, A. (2017). Hands-on machine learning with Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow: concepts, tools, and techniques to build intelligent systems. O'Reilly Media, Inc.
  15. Leem, Y., Hwang, Y., & Choi, Y. (2005). Factor Analysis on Injured People using Data Mining Technique, Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science, 7(4), 61-71.
  16. Cheng, C. W., Leu, S. S., Cheng, Y. M., Wu, T. C., & Lin, C. C. (2012). Applying data mining techniques to explore factors contributing to occupational injuries in Taiwan's construction industry. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 48, 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.014
  17. Goh, Y. M., & Binte Sa'adon, N. F. (2015). Cognitive factors influencing safety behavior at height: a multimethod exploratory study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 141(6), 04015003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000972
  18. Mistikoglu, G., Gerek, I. H., Erdis, E., Usmen, P. M., Cakan, H., & Kazan, E. E. (2015). Decision tree analysis of construction fall accidents involving roofers. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(4), 2256-2263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.009
  19. Cho, Y., Kim, Y., & Shin, Y. (2017). Prediction Model of Construction Safety Accidents using Decision Tree Technique. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, 17(3), 295-303. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2017.17.3.295
  20. Rojas, R. (2009). AdaBoost and the super bowl of classifiers a tutorial introduction to adaptive boosting. Freie University, Berlin, Tech. Rep.
  21. Bergstra, J., Yamins, D., & Cox, D. D. (2013). Hyperopt: A python library for optimizing the hyperparameters of machine learning algorithms. In Proceedings of the 12th Python in science conference (pp. 13-20).
  22. Arlot, S., & Celisse, A. (2010). A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics surveys, 4, 40-79. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-SS054
  23. Tsoumakas, G., & Katakis, I. (2007). Multi-label classification: An overview. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), 3(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdwm.2007070101
  24. Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A. L., Kneib, T., Augustin, T., & Zeileis, A. (2008). Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC bioinformatics, 9(1), 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-307
  25. Parr, T., Turgutlu, K., Csiszar, C., & Howard, J. (2018). Beware Default Random Forest Importances.