Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Review of Safety Standards in Korea based on Structural Attributes and Lexical Characteristics

구조적 속성과 어휘적 특징에 기반한 안전기준 고찰

  • Im, Sujung (Division of Safety Research, National Disaster Management Institute) ;
  • Park, Dugkeun (Division of Safety Research, National Disaster Management Institute)
  • 임수정 (국립재난안전연구원 안전연구실) ;
  • 박덕근 (국립재난안전연구원 안전연구실)
  • Received : 2019.08.28
  • Accepted : 2019.11.20
  • Published : 2019.11.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As social standards have been subdivided and specialized due to social development, the number of related laws has also increased gradually, resulting in problems of duplication or conflict within the laws. After collecting all the safety standards that exist in Korea's legislation, it is necessary to analyze the characteristics of safety standards to find duplicate or conflicting issues. In this study, the characteristics of safety standards were divided into structural parts and lexical parts by extracting common elements that appear in all safety standards and singular points that appear only in specific safety standards. As a result of the analysis, two structural properties of safety standard were found and four lexical features were derived. The impact of these characteristics on future systems for managing safety standards was also reviewed. Based on this study, when more structural and lexical features of safety standards are accumulated in the future, it is possible to develop efficient algorithms to collect and analyze safety standards, which will help solve the problem of duplication and conflict of safety standards in the law.

사회발달로 인해 안전기준이 세분화 전문화되면서 관련 법령 또한 그 수가 점차 증가하여 법령 내에서 중복 또는 상충의 문제점이 나타나고 있다. 우리나라 법령에 존재하는 모든 안전기준을 수집한 후 중복 또는 상충문제를 찾아내기 위해서는 우선 안전기준이 가지는 특성들을 분석할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 모든 안전기준에서 나타나는 공통요소와 특정 안전기준에서만 나타나는 특이점을 추출하면서 안전기준의 특성을 크게 구조적, 어휘적 부분으로 구분하였다. 분석결과, 안전기준의 구조적 속성은 2가지, 어휘적 특징은 4가지로 도출되었다. 이러한 특성들이 안전기준을 관리할 향후 시스템에 미치는 영향에 대해서도 추가로 검토하였다. 본 연구를 기반으로 향후 더 많은 안전기준의 구조 및 어휘적 특성들이 축적된다면 효율적인 안전기준의 수집.분석 알고리즘 개발이 가능해져 결국 법령내 안전기준의 중복 상충 문제점 해소에 도움이 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. S. J. Lim & D. Park. (2018). Preliminary survey of the safety standards in korea to estimate their scale and analyses of representative problem cases. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 18(6), 111-122. DOI : 10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.6.111
  2. National Disaster Management Research Institute. (2017). Methodology design for safety standards analyses based on structuralization of attribute information, Ulsan : National Disaster Management Research Institute.
  3. C. S. Yoon et al. (2014). Comparison between the chemical management contents of laws pertaining to the ministry of environment and the ministry of the employment and labor, J Environ Health Sci, 40(5), 331-345. DOI : 10.5668/JEHS.2014.40.5.331
  4. J. H. Kim. (2004). A study on the reform of the overlapping regulation in the industrial safety sector. Korean Society and Public Administration, 15(1), 211-233.
  5. B. Y. Kim & H. Y. Kwon. (2017). The status and improvement of product safety management law and institution, Journal of Law & Economic Regulation, 10(1), 61-79.
  6. C. O. Kim. (2000). The government's safety management policy and the safety culture campaign, Hwanghae Review, 26, 379-391.
  7. H. W. Lee & Y. J. Lee. (2013) Effective Safety Management by the Classification of Safety Standard, Korean Society of Societal Security. 6(3), 35-42. DOI : 10.21729/ksds.2013.6.3.035
  8. K. Ho Noh. & U. C. Ryu. (2017). A Study on Applying Safety Standard of Flicker for LED Lightings, Journal of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers, 31(9), 75-80. DOI : 10.5207/JIEIE.2017.31.9.075
  9. J. R. Cho & J. H. Lee. (2018) Study on the Safety Standard Establishment of Halogen Clean Extinguishing Agents, Fire Science And Engineering, 32(5), 22-33. DOI : 10.7731/KIFSE.2018.32.5.022
  10. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. (2008). A study on the institutionalization of safety technological standards standardization. Seoul : Ministry of the Interior and Safety.
  11. K. S. An, H. C. Lee & S. Heo. (2017). Feature Selection Algorithm for Multivariate Time Series Data Classification, Korean Institute Of Industrial Engineers. 3708-3730.
  12. B. S. Park & B. T. Zhang. (2001). Text Categorization Using Both Lexical Information and Syntactic Information, Proceedings of the 28th KISS Fall Conference, 29(2), 37-39.
  13. K. B. Choi. (2001) Semantic Classification of Vocabulary for the Construction of the Knowledge Base - with special reference to the classification of nouns, Discourse and Cognition, 8(2), 275-303.
  14. J. M. Duan, H. & H. Li. (2015). Lexical Characteristics Analysis of Chinese Clinical Documents. In 2015 7th International Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME), (pp. 121-125). IEEE.
  15. I. Meyer, K. Eck & D. Skuce (1997). 1.4. 2 Systematic concept analysis within a knowledge-based approach to terminology. Handbook of Terminology Management. Ed. by SE Wright and G. Budin, 1, 98-119.
  16. Ministry of Public Safety and Security. (2016). A study on the construction of integrated management and operating system of safety standards, Sejong : Ministry of Public Safety and Security.
  17. National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation. (2019). Health based guidance value[Online]. http://www.nifds.go.kr/wpge/m_280/cont_03/cont_03_08_05_03_02.do
  18. Ministry of Public Safety and Security. (2016). A study on the improvement of safety management system and safety standards in the living and leisure fields, Sejong : Ministry of Public Safety and Security
  19. M. Y. Kim. (2016). A study on improvement of laws for life safety, Law Review, 16(2), 325-345.
  20. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. (2017.08.31.) Registration policy for deliberation on safety standards will be implemented, Mois [Online] https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type010/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000008&nttId=59414
  21. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. (2019.04.23.) Reasonable safety standards are improved to prevent accidents. Mois [Online] https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type010/commonSelectBoardArticle.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000008&nttId=70278
  22. Ministry of Public Safety and Security. (2015). Development of management system through systematization of safety standards. Sejong : Ministry of Public Safety and Security
  23. J. O. Park, M. R. Yeom & D. Y. Jung. (2016). A study on the ontology-based regional user-centric convergence content design information retrieval, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 7(2), 19-24. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2016.7.2.019
  24. J. S. Kang & K. Y. Chung. (2018). Heterogeneous lifelog mining model in health big-data platform, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(10), 75-80. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.10.075
  25. Y. S. Han, H. Y. Kim, J. Y. Song & T. M. Song. (2019). Ontology development of school bullying for social big data collection and analysis, Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(6), 10-23, DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.06.010
  26. T. Y. Park, S. J. Kim & H. J. Oh. (2019). Empirical verification of the disaster safety information facet classification scheme, J. Korean Soc. Hazard Mitig., 19(3), 85-95. DOI : /10.9798/KOSHAM.2019.19.3.85
  27. National Disaster Management Research Institute. (2016). Research on process design for safety standard extraction and analysis. Ulsan : National Disaster Management Research Institute.
  28. D. Biber. (1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. New York : Cambridge University Press.
  29. S. C. Whang & S. J. Kang (2012). Multi-level mapping of ontologies based on lexical and structural information, Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems, 22(1), 42-48. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/JKIIS.2012.22.1.42 https://doi.org/10.5391/JKIIS.2012.22.1.42
  30. S. Y. Kwon. (2014) A Study on the Factors Influencing Semantic Relation in Building a Structured Glossary. The Korean Society For Library And Information Science, 48(2), 353-378. DOI : 10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.2.353
  31. K. I. Nam & J. Choi (2014). Extraction of Key-constructions on Korean Academic Texts: Focused on Academic Corpora in the Field of Korean Linguistics and Literature, Korean Language and Literature, 60(1), 65-92.
  32. K. I. Nam & S. J. Lee. (2012). Procedures and Issues on Korean Keyword Analysis: focused on academic keyword in the field of Korean. literature and lingusitics. Textlinguistics 32. 89-121.
  33. K.. Church, W. Gale, P. Hanks & D. Hindle. (1991). Using statistics in lexical analysis. Lexical acquisition: exploiting on-line resources to build a lexicon, 115, 164. DOI : 10.1.1.136.6572
  34. A. Rajput. (2019). Natural Language Processing, Sentiment Analysis and Clinical Analytics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00679.
  35. B. J. Dorr. (1992). The use of lexical semantics in interlingual machine translation. Machine Translation, 7(3), 135-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402510
  36. S. M. Chowdhury, S. Abujar, M. Saifuzzaman, P. Ghosh & S. A. Hossain. (2019). Sentiment Prediction Based on Lexical Analysis Using Deep Learning. In Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security. 441-449. DOI : 10.1007/978-981-13-1501-5_38
  37. National Disaster Management Research Institute. (2018). Development of application technology for safety standard analysis based on accident case studies. Ulsan : National Disaster Management Research Institute.
  38. D. S. Lee, B. R. Kim & B. S. Kim. (2019). A study on standardization of the public use of disaster and safety information. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 19(3). 75-83. DOI : 10.9798/KOSHAM.2019.19.3.75
  39. S. J. Im & D. K. Park (2019). Standard safety policy: a retrospect of the Korean chicken egg crisis in 2017. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, 1-8. DOI : 10.1007/s00003-019-01217-5
  40. Ministry of Government Legislation (2019. 09. 09.) Ministry of Government Legislation-State of the law. [Online]. http://www.moleg.go.kr/lawinfo/status/statusReport
  41. H. S. Choi, & J. D. Kim. (2019) A Comparative Study on the Korean Type Regulatory Sandbox System : the Industrial Fusion Promotion Act, the Information and Communication Convergence Act, the Financial Innovation Act, A Study on the Regional Special Districts Act. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(3). 73-78. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.3.073
  42. J. E. Jeon & S. H. Lee. (2019) A study on the legal structure of the nuclear law system using social network analysis. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8). 47-60. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.8.047