DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Measures to Activate Education Field of Maker Movement in Korea

국내 메이커 운동의 교육 분야 활성화 방안 연구

  • Oh, Soo-Jin (International Design Trend Center, Hongik University) ;
  • Baek, Yun-Cheol (Department of Computer Science, Sangmyung University) ;
  • Kwon, Ji-Eun (Department of Human-centered Artificial Intelligence, Sangmyung University)
  • 오수진 (홍익대학교 국제디자인트렌드센터) ;
  • 백윤철 (상명대학교 컴퓨터과학과) ;
  • 권지은 (상명대학교 휴먼지능정보공학과)
  • Received : 2019.08.23
  • Accepted : 2019.11.20
  • Published : 2019.11.28

Abstract

The culture and education are very active with the active policy and support to form the government's Maker Movement. The purpose of this study is to grasp the current status of the education sector of the domestic maker movement, which is increasing recently, and to propose a plan for activating maker education for the development of a positive direction. To this end, first, the current status and problems of domestic maker training are derived through in-depth interviews with existing maker training operators and participants. Second, based on the contents of the interview script, keyword analysis and its characteristics through the qualitative survey analysis program (NVIVO) are identified. Third, based on the analysis results, we propose a plan and development direction for domestic maker education. Based on the educators who performed maker training and the students involved, professional maker teachers were required for the professionalism of education, and the expansion of maker channels and professional networking of participating students was required. In addition, there was a need for specialized programs and appropriate policy support that reflected the characteristics of maker training. This study aims at contributing to the activation of maker education, which is a major field of maker movement, by helping to improve concrete support methods, training related educators, and educational environment for maker education.

정부의 메이커 운동(Maker Movement) 형성을 위한 적극적인 정책과 지원으로 관련 문화와 교육이 매우 활성화되고 있다. 본 연구는 최근 증가하고 있는 국내 메이커 운동의 교육 분야의 현황을 파악하고, 긍정적인 방향의 발전을 위한 메이커 교육 활성화 방안을 제안하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 첫째, 기존의 메이커 교육 운영자와 참여자를 대상으로 하는 심층 인터뷰를 통해 국내 메이커 교육의 현황과 문제점을 도출한다. 둘째, 인터뷰 스크립트 내용을 기반으로 질적 조사 분석 프로그램(NVIVO)을 통한 키워드 분석과 그 특징을 파악한다. 셋째, 분석 결과를 토대로 국내 메이커 교육의 활성화를 위한 방안과 발전 방향을 제안한다. 메이커 교육을 실행한 교육자와 참여한 학생을 기준으로 분석했을 때, 교육의 전문성을 위해 전문 메이커 교사가 필요했고, 참여한 학생들의 메이커 채널 확장과 전문적인 네트워킹이 요구되었다. 또한, 메이커 교육의 특성을 반영한 전문 프로그램과 적절한 정책 지원이 필요했다. 본 연구는 향후 메이커 교육을 위한 구체적인 지원 방식 및 관련 교육자 양성과 교육 환경 등의 개선에 도움을 주어 메이커 운동의 주요 분야인 메이커 교육의 활성화에 기여하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. S. Seo. (2019). A Study on the Autonomous Decision Right of Emotional AI based on Analysis of 4th Wave Technology Availability in the Hyper-Linkage, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(8), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.8.009
  2. H. W. Yim. (2018). A Study on Development of SMEs Start-up Consulting Course by Convergence subject STEAM, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(6), 381-387. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.6.381
  3. Mark Hatch. (2014). The M-aker Movement Manifesto, San Francisco : Mc Graw Hill Education.
  4. S. J. Kwak. (2019). Service Design Guideline for Maker Space. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(2), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.389
  5. J. E. Kwon. (2018) Research on the actual condition of Korea Makers, Korea Foundation for The advancement of Science & Creativity.
  6. Erica R. Halverson & Kimberly M. Sheridan. (2014). The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, Winter, 21-32.
  7. L. Martin. (2015). The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research. 5(1), 4.
  8. Kimberly M. Sheridan, Abigail W. Konopasky, Asia Williams & Grace J.J. Wingo, (2016). Resourceful and Inclusive: Towards Design Principles for Makerspaces, paper presented at AERA.
  9. Shirin Vossoughi, Paula Hooper, Meg Escude. (2016). Exploratorium, Making Through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity, Summer issue of the Harvard Educational Review. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.1.14141916116656q6
  10. Kelvin Seifert & Rosemary Sutton. (2009), Global Text Project. Zurich : Educational Psychology: Second Edition. 33-37.
  11. ShaMita Sha. (2015.11.25.). The Constructivism. Pedagogy In Education. http://pedagogy28. blogspot.com
  12. I. A. Kang & M. K. Kim. (2017). Exploring Educational Effects of Maker Activity in an Elementary School Class. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(14), 487-515. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2017.17.14.487
  13. M. J. Kang. (2018). Development of Checklist for Development and Operation of Maker Education Program. Master Degree Thesis, Kyunghee University.
  14. H. J. Cha & T. J. Park. (2018). A Development of Recommendation to Promote Maker Education at the Korean .Primary & Secondary School Level in Korea through Analysis of Glabal Maker Education Best Practices. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(11), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.11.097
  15. H. M. Jung. (2018). Development of Maker Education Program Using Museum. Master Degree Thesis, Seoul National University of Education.
  16. Bill Derry, David V. Loertscher, Leslie Preddy, (2013). uTEC Maker Model, http://research-archive.canadianschoollibraries.ca
  17. Sylvia Libow Martinez & Gary Stager. (2013). The Makered Mindset "The central thesis is that students should engage in tinkering and making because they are powerful ways to learn", Maker Education in SD57, 1-11
  18. H. J. Yoon. (2018). The Development of a Model of Maker Education Utilizing Design Thinking, Doctor Degree Thesis, Kyunghee University.