Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제33권4호
  • /
  • Pages.525-535
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic performance assessment of steel building frames equipped with a novel type of bending dissipative braces

  • Taiyari, Farshad (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz) ;
  • Mazzolani, Federico M. (Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Naples "Federico II") ;
  • Bagheri, Saman (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.02
  • 심사 : 2019.10.14
  • 발행 : 2019.11.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The seismic performance of steel frames equipped with a particular type of bending dissipative braces (BDBs) having U elements, which has recently been introduced and tested by the authors, is investigated. For this purpose, two structural systems, i.e., simple and dual steel building frames, both with diagonal BDBs and different number of stories, are considered. After providing a design method of this new BDB, the detailed structural models are developed in the OpenSees platform to perform nonlinear dynamic analyses. Seismic performance factors like ductility, overstrength, response modification and deflection amplification factors are calculated using incremental dynamic analysis (IDA). In addition, to assess the damage probability of the structural models, their seismic fragilities are developed. The results show high energy dissipation capacity of both structural systems while the number of U elements needed for the bracing system of each story in the moment frames are less than those in the corresponding non-moment (simple) frames. The average response modification and deflection amplification factors for both structural schemes are obtained about 8.6 and 5.4, respectively, which are slightly larger than the corresponding recommended values of ASCE for the typical buckling-restrained braces (BRBs).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aghlara, R. and Tahir, M.M. (2018), "A passive metallic damper with replaceable steel bar components for earthquake protection of structures", Eng. Struct., 159, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.049
  2. Aguirre, M. and Sanchez, A.R. (1992), "Structural seismic damper", J. Struct. Eng., 118(5), 1158-1171. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1158)
  3. AISC 360-10 (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings; American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, USA.
  4. ASCE/SEI 7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures; American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.
  5. Bagheri, S., Barghian, M., Saieri, F. and Farzinfar, A. (2015), "Ushaped metallic-yielding damper in building structures: Seismic behavior and comparison with a friction damper", Struct., 3, 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.04.003
  6. Black, C.J., Makris, N. and Aiken, I.D. (2004), "Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of bucklingrestrained braces", J. Struct. Eng., 130(6), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(880)
  7. Deng, K., Pan, P. and Wang, C. (2013), "Development of crawler steel damper for bridges", J. Constr. Steel Res., 85, 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.03.009
  8. Dolce, M., Filardi, B., Marnetto, R. and Nigro, D. (1996), "Experimental tests and applications of a new biaxial elastoplastic device for the passive control of structures", Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Joint Sealants and Bearing Systems for Concrete Structures, ACI SP-164, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  9. Fanaie, N. and Shamlou, S.O. (2015), "Response modification factor of mixed structures", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 19(6), 1449-1466. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.6.1449
  10. FEMA-356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
  11. FEMA-P695 (2009), Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
  12. Gioncu, V. and Mazzolani, F.M. (2013), Seismic Design of Steel Structures, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
  13. Giugliano, M.T., Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2011), "Seismic reliability of traditional and innovative concentrically braced frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(13), 1455-1474. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1098
  14. Gray, M., Christopoulos, C., Packer, J. and Oliveira, C.D. (2012), "A new brace option for ductile braced frames", Modern Steel Constr., 52(2), 40-43.
  15. Kelly, J.M., Skinner, R.I. and Heine, A.J. (1972), "Mechanism of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures", Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 5(3), 63-88.
  16. Kim, J., Park, J. and Kim, S.D. (2009), "Seismic behavior factors of buckling-restrained braced frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 33(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.3.261
  17. Longo, A., Montuori, R. and Piluso, V. (2016), "Moment framesconcentrically braced frames dual systems: analysis of different design criteria", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 12(1), 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.996164
  18. Louzai, A. and Abed, A. (2015), "Evaluation of the seismic behavior factor of reinforced concrete frame structures based on comparative analysis between non-linear static pushover and incremental dynamic analyses", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 13(6), 1773-1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9689-7
  19. Mahmoudi, M. and Abdi, M.G. (2012), "Evaluating response modification factors of TADAS frames", J. Constr. Steel Res., 71, 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.015
  20. Sireteanu, T., Mitu, A.M., Giuclea, M. and Solomon, O. (2014a), "A comparative study of the dynamic behavior of Ramberg-Osgood and Bouc-Wen hysteretic models with application to seismic protection devices", Eng. Struct., 76, 255-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.002
  21. Sireteanu, T., Mitu, A.M., Giuclea, M., Solomon, O. and Stefanov, D. (2014b), "Analytical method for fitting the Ramberg-Osgood model to given hysteresis loops", Proceedings of the Romanian Academy-A, 15(1), 35-42.
  22. Taiyari, F., Mazzolani, F.M. and Bagheri, S. (2019a), "A proposal for energy dissipative braces with U-shaped steel strips", J. Constr. Steel Res., 154, 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.11.031
  23. Taiyari, F., Mazzolani, F.M. and Bagheri, S. (2019b), "Damagebased optimal design of friction dampers in multistory chevron braced steel frames", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 119, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.01.004
  24. Takeuchi, T. and Wada, A. (2017), "Buckling-restrained braces and applications", Japan Society of Seismic Isolation, Japan.
  25. Uang, C.M. (1991), "Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd factors for building seismic provisions", J. Struct. Eng., 117(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:1(19)
  26. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  27. Wada, A., Saeki, E., Takeuchi, T. and Watanabe, A. (1998), "Development of unbounded brace", Nippon Steel Corporation: Building Construction and Urban Development Division, Japan.
  28. Xie, Q. (2005), "State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia", J. Constr. Steel Res., 61(6), 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.11.005
  29. Xu, Z.D., Dai, J. and Jiang, Q.W. (2018), "Study on fatigue life and mechanical properties of BRBs with viscoelastic filler", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 26(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.26.2.139