DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Moderating Effect of Instruction and Curriculum on Relationship between Educational Service Quality and Student satisfaction in Universities in China

대학교육서비스 품질요인과 학생만족도에 대한 교수방법 및 교육과정의 조절효과 연구

  • 김영길 (신한대학교 글로벌통상경영학과)
  • Received : 2019.08.09
  • Accepted : 2019.09.20
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

The authors of this study conducted research on universities located in China, and the primary purpose of the study was to test whether the quality factors of university education service have a positive (+) effect on student satisfaction. The secondary purpose of the study was to identify and analyze whether university instruction and curriculum variables had a positive regulatory effect on the relationship between quality factors and student satisfaction. First, Research Hypothesis 1, which suggested that university education service quality factors would have a positive effect on student satisfaction, was adopted. As the second analytical process of the study, controlled regression analysis was used to verify whether instruction and the curriculum had a regulatory effect on the relationship between the university education service quality factors and student satisfaction. When the two variables were analyzed as control variables, the results showed that curriculum had a significant positive regulatory effect, and instruction was shown to not be suitable for generating win-win cooperation or synergistic effects. The contributions of the theoretical perspective of this study were the analysis of the relationship between university education service quality factors in Chinese universities and student satisfaction, and systematically linking instructions and the curriculum and analyzing the impact on student satisfaction. The study implies that it would be more effective to analyze additional factors in the operation of universities through in-depth analysis on instruction from a practical standpoint.

본 연구는 중국에 소재하는 대학들을 연구 대상으로 분석하였으며 대학교육서비스 품질요인이 학생 만족도에 정(+)의 영향력을 미치는지를 검정하는 것을 1차 목적으로 설정하였다. 이어서, 대학교육서비스 품질요인과 학생 만족도 간의 관계에 대해 대학의 교수방법과 교수과정 변수가 각각 긍정적인 조절효과를 갖는지를 확인 및 분석하는 것을 연구의 2차 목적으로 하였다. 첫째 대학교육서비스 품질요인은 학생 만족도에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 연구가설1은 채택되었다. 본 연구의 두 번째 분석과정으로서, 교수방법과 교수과정이 대학교육서비스 품질요인과 학생 만족도 간의 관계에 대해 조절 효과를 갖는지를 조절적 회귀분석의 방법으로 검증하였다. 두 변수를 조절변수로 한 분석하였을 시, 그중 교수과정은 유의미한 긍정적인 조절효과를 갖는다는 결과가 나타났으며 교수방법은 학생 만족도 성과에 상생협력 적합성과 시너지 효과를 기대하기 어렵다는 결과를 도출하였다. 본 연구의 이론적 관점의 공헌은 대학교육서비스 품질요인과 학생 만족도에 간의 관계를 중국 대학을 연구 대상으로 하여 분석하였다는 점과 교수방법과 교수과정을 유기적으로 연계시켜 학생 만족도에 대한 영향을 분석하였다는 점이라고 볼 수 있으며, 실무적 측점에서 교수과정에 대한 심층적인 분석을 통해 대학 운영에 추가 요인으로 분석하는 것이 보다 효과적일 것이라는 시사점을 제공하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. (2016). Effect of student perceived service quality on student satisfaction, loyalty and motivation in Indian universities. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 488-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-01-2014-0010
  2. Athiyaman, Adee. (1977). "Linking student satisfaction and service quality perceptions : the case of university education". European Journal of Marketing, 31(7),528-540. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569710176655
  3. Becket, N & Brookes, M. (2008). "Quality management practice in higher education-What quality are we actually enhancing?". Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 7(1).
  4. Becket, N & Brooks, M. (2008). "Quality management practice in higher education-What quality is we actually enhancing?". Journal of Hospitality, Leisure,Sport and Tourism Education, 7(1).
  5. Becket, N & Brookes, M, (2008). "Quality management practice in higher education-What quality are we actually enhancing?". Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 7(1).
  6. Carey, K. Cambiano, R. L & De Vore, J. B. (2002). "Student to faculty satisfaction at a Midwestern university in the United States". HERDSA, 1(8)93-97.
  7. Chen, S, Yang, C, Shiau, J & Wang, H. (2006). "The development of an employee satisfaction model for higeer education". [J]. The TQM Magazine, 18(5).
  8. Chou, C., Wang, Y., & Tang, T. (2015). Exploring the determinants of knowledge adoption in virtual communities: A social influence perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 364-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.02.001
  9. Crronin. J. & Taylor. S. A. (1992). "Measuring service quality:a reexamination and extension". Journal of Marketing, 56(3)55-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299205600304
  10. Garcia-Aracil. A. (2009). "European graduates' level of satisfaction with higher education". Higher Education, 57(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9121-9
  11. Gibbs, P&Iacovidou, M. (2004). "Quality as pedagogy of confinement:is there an alternative?". Quality Assurance in Educaion, 12(3).
  12. Gold E. (2001). "Customer service:a key unifying force for today campus". National Association of student personnel administration, 22(3).
  13. Hartman, D. E&Schmidt, S. L. (1995). "Understanding student/alumni satisfaction from a consumer's perspective: the effects of institutional performance and program outcomes". Research in Higher Education, 36(2):197-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207788
  14. Harvey, L. (2002). "The end of quality?". Quality in Higher Education, 8(1).
  15. Helgeson. O & Nesset. E. (2007). "What accounts for student's loyalty? Some field study evidence". International Journal of Education, 21(2).
  16. Helgesen, O. & Nesset, E. (2007). "Images, Satisfaction and antecedents:drivers of student Loyalty? A case study of Norwegian University College". Corporate Reputation Review, 10(1):160-180.
  17. Hill, Y, Lomas, L & Mac Gregor, J. (2003). "Students' perceptions of quality in higher education". Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880310462047
  18. Hom, W. (2002). "Applying Customer Satisfaction Theory to Community College Planning of Student Services". I-Journal, 6(3).
  19. Ji, Z. (2009). Teaching evaluation. Chinese Education and Society, 42(2):7-19. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932420201
  20. Juillerat. S. & Schreiner. L. A. (1996). "The role of student satisfaction in assessment of institutional effectiveness". Assessment update, 8(1):8-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/au.3650080108
  21. Ohnston, R & Kong, X. (2011). "The customer experience: a road-map for improvement". Managing Service Quality, 21(1):5-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111100225
  22. Kimani, Sarah Wambui, Kagia, Elias Kiarie, & Kendi, Lydia. (2011). "Comparative Analysis of Business Students Perceptions of service Quality Offered in Kenyan Universities". International Journal of Business Administration, 2(1):98.
  23. Kim, Soo-Young(1992). A study on Educational Belief and the Teaching Behavior of Kindergarten Teachers in the Taegu District. Ewha Womans University. doctoral thesis
  24. Kotler, P & Clarke, R. N. (1987). "Marketing for health care organizations". Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  25. Lee,Bong-a(2010). Educational Belief, Educational Practice, and Conflicts of Full-Day Class Teachers at Public Kindergarten. Gyeongin National University of Education, A master's thesis.
  26. Leyla Temizer & Aji Turkyilmaz. (2012). "Implementation of student satisfaction index model in higher education institutions". Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 4(5):380-386.
  27. Martinez-Arguelles, M., & Batalla-Busquets, J. (2016). Perceived service quality and student loyalty in an online university. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 264-279.
  28. Munteanu, Corne liu, Ciprian, Bobalca, Claudia, & Anton, Oana, (2010). "An analysis of customer satisfaction in a higher education context". International Journal of Public Sector Management. 23(2),124-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011022483
  29. Oldfield, Brenda M, & Baron, Steve. (2000). "Student perceptions of service quality in a UK university business and management faculty". Quality Assurance in education, 8(2),85-95 https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880010325600
  30. Palacio, A. B. Menesses, G. D and Perez, P. J. (2002). "The configuration of the university image and its relationship with the satisfaction of students". Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5):486-505 https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210440311
  31. Robin, R. H. & Schwarts, S. L.(1982). Designing Curriculum for early Childhood. Allyn & Bacon Inc.
  32. Sandada, M., & Matibiri, B. (2016). An Investigation into the Impact of Service Quality, Frequent Flier Programs and Safety Perception on Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in the Airline Industry in Southern Africa. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 11(1), 41-53 https://doi.org/10.1515/jeb-2016-0006
  33. Sojkin, B. Bartkowiak, P and Skuza, A. (2011). "Determinants of higher education choices and student satisfaction: the case of Poland". Higher Education, 24(6):33-40.
  34. Waheed, M., Kaur, K., & Kumar, S. (2016). What role does knowledge quality play in online students' satisfaction, learning and loyalty? An empirical investigation in an eLearning context. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 561-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12153
  35. Wells, V. and Daunt, K. (2011). "Eduscape: an exploratory analysis of the physical learning environment, proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Annual Conference". Liverpool, UK, July.
  36. William, J. (2002). "The student satisfaction approach:student feedback and its potential role in quality assessment and enhancement". Prague, September.