DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study on the UK Park and Green Space Policies for Inclusive Urban Regeneration

영국의 포용적 도시재생을 위한 공원녹지 정책 사례 연구

  • 김정화 (서울시립대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 김용국 (건축도시공간연구소)
  • Received : 2019.03.06
  • Accepted : 2019.10.25
  • Published : 2019.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the direction of developing policies for parks and green spaces for inclusive urban planning and regeneration. By reviewing the status, budget, and laws pertaining to urban parks in Korea, as well as assessing the inclusivity of urban parks, this study revealed the problems and limitations in Korea as follows. First, the urban park system, which takes into account indicators such as park area per capita and green space ratio, is focused only on quantitative expansion. Second, the distribution of urban parks is unequal; hence, the higher the number of vulnerable residents, the lower the quality of urban parks and green spaces. Moreover, this study focused on the UK central government, along with the five local governments, including London, Edinburgh, Cardiff, Belfast, and Liverpool. Through an analysis of the contexts and contents establishing UK park and green space policies that can reduce socioeconomic inequalities while at the same time increase inclusiveness. This study discovered the following. The government's awareness of the necessity of tackling socioeconomic inequalities to make an inclusive society, the change in the urban regeneration policies from physical redevelopment to neighborhood renewal, and the survey and research on the correlation of parks and green spaces, inequality, health, and well-being provided the background for policy establishment. As a result, the creation of an inclusive society has been reflected in the stated goals of the UK's national plan and the strategies for park and green space supply and qualitative improvement. Deprived areas and vulnerable groups have been included in many local governments' park and green space policies. Also, tools for analyzing deficiencies in parks and methods for examining the qualitative evaluation of parks were developed. Besides, for the sustainability of each project, various funding programs have been set up, such as raising funds and fund-matching schemes. Different ways of supporting partnerships have been arranged, such as the establishment of collaborative bodies for government organizations, allowing for the participation of private organizations. The study results suggested five policy schemes, including conducting research on inequality and inclusiveness for parks and green spaces, developing strategies for improving the quality of park services, identifying tools for analyzing policy areas, developing park project models for urban regeneration, and building partnerships and establishing support systems.

본 연구의 목적은 포용적 도시계획과 재생을 위한 공원녹지 정책의 개발 방향을 모색하는 데 있다. 국내 도시공원의 조성 현황 예산 법률 제도를 검토하고, 도시공원의 포용성 수준을 조사하여 다음과 같은 문제점과 한계를 드러냈다. 첫째, 1인당 공원 면적과 녹지율과 같은 공급자 중심의 지표를 지니는 도시공원 제도는 양적 확충에 초점이 맞춰져 있다. 둘째, 도시공원의 분포는 불균등하고, 공원녹지의 질적 수준은 취약계층 거주지일수록 낮다. 다음으로 영국 중앙정부와 런던, 에든버러, 카디프, 벨파스트, 리버풀 등 다섯 개 지방정부를 중심으로 사회경제적 불평등 완화와 포용성 확대를 위한 공원녹지 정책의 수립 배경과 내용을 분석하여 다음과 같은 특징을 밝혔다. 사회경제적 불평등 해소와 포용적 사회 건설의 필요성에 대한 정부의 인식, 물리적 재개발에서 사회경제적 재생으로 도시재생정책 방향의 변화, 공원녹지와 불평등 건강 웰빙의 상호관계에 대한 조사와 연구가 정책 수립의 배경으로 작용하였다. 그 결과, 영국 국토계획의 목표에 포용적 사회 만들기가 반영되었으며, 여러 지방정부의 공원녹지 정책에 박탈 지역과 취약계층을 중심으로 한 공원녹지 공급과 질적 개선 전략이 포함되었다. 또한 공원 결핍 분석 도구와 공원의 질적 평가 방법이 개발되었다. 이와 함께 각 사업의 지속가능성을 위해 별도의 기금 마련과 매칭 펀드 활용과 같은 다양한 재원 프로그램, 그리고 정부 조직 간 협업 기구 설립과 민간 조직의 적극적인 참여와 활성화와 같은 파트너십 구축 방안이 마련되었다. 이를 바탕으로 본 연구는 공원녹지의 불평등과 포용성에 대한 조사와 연구 수행, 공원서비스의 질적 수준 향상전략 개발, 정책 필요 지역 분석도구 개발, 도시재생을 위한 공원사업 유형 개발, 다양한 파트너십 구축과 지원제도 마련 등, 다섯 가지 정책 방향을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Belfast City Council(2005) Your City, Your Space.
  2. Belfast City Council(2014) The Belfast Agenda.
  3. CABE(2006) Green Space Strategy: A Good Practice Guide.
  4. CABE(2008) Inclusion by Design: Equality, Diversity and the Built Environment.
  5. CABE(2009) Open Space Strategies: Best Practice Guidance.
  6. CABE(2010a) Community Green: Using Local Spaces to Tackle Inequality and Improve Health.
  7. CABE(2010b) Urban Green Nation: Building the Evidence Base.
  8. Cardiff Council(2018) Funding of Parks. An Inquiry Report of the: Economy & Culture Scrutiny Committee.
  9. Cardiff Public Services Board(2018) Cardiff Well-Being Plan 2018-2023.
  10. Cochrane, A.(2007) Understanding Urban Policy: A Critical Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  11. Cohen, D. A., T. L. McKenzie, A. Sehgal, S. Williamson, D. Golinelli, and N. Lurie(2007) Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health 97(3): 509-514. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.072447
  12. Dados, N. and R. Connell(2012) The global South. Contexts [American Sociological Association] 11(1): 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212436479
  13. Higgins, M., C. Hague, A. Prior, S. McIntosh, M. Satsangi, F. Warren, H. Smith, and G. Netto(2005) Diversity and Equality in Planning: A Good Practice Guide. Report to Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
  14. Hills, J.(2010) An Anatomy of Economic Inequality in the UK: Report of the National Equality Panel. Government Equalities Office.
  15. Jeon, K. S.(2009) Abandoned rail track greenway park from the viewpoint of sustainable urban regeneration in Gwangju. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society 12(3): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2009.12.1.1
  16. Jung, E. J., J. M. Na, and B. H. Jeong(2016) Study on the utilization of public space for the community revitalization: A case of Ssangam Neighborhood Park in GMC. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association 29(2): 51-73.
  17. Kazmierczak, A.(2013) The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landscape and Urban Planning 109(1): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.007
  18. Kim, MJ.(2014) Impact on settlement consciousness from regeneration of park and green space at deteriorated residential area in Busan. Journal of the Korean Housing Association 25(6): 85-92. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2014.25.6.085
  19. Kim, Y. G. and J. M. Choi(2012) The implications and characteristics of the policies for park and green spaces in England. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(2): 86-96. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.2.086
  20. Kim, Y. G. and M. Roe(2007) A study on partnerships in the development of parks in UK. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 35(2): 1-12.
  21. Kim, Y. G.(2015) Parks Equity in Metropolitan Seoul for the Implementation of Green Welfare. Ph.D. Dissertation. Seoul National University.
  22. Ko, Y. J., K. H. Cho, and W. C. Kim(2019) Analysis of environmental equity of green space services in Seoul: The case of Jung-gu, Seongdong-gu and Dongdaemun- gu. Journal of the Korean Insititute of Landscape Architecture 47(2): 100-116. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2019.47.2.100
  23. Konijnendijk, C. C., M. Annerstedt, A. B. Nielsen, and S. Maruthaveeran(2013) Benefits of urban parks: A systematic review. Report to IFPRA.
  24. Kweon, B. S., W. C. Sullivan, and A. R. Wiley(1998) Green common spaces and the social integration of inner city older adults. Environmental Behaviour 30(6): 832-858. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000605
  25. Landscape Institute(2013a) Green Infrastructure: An Integrated Approach to Land Use.
  26. Landscape Institute(2013b) Public Health and Landscape: Creating Healthy Places.
  27. Lee, N.(2019) Inclusive growth in cities: A sympathetic critique. Regional Studies 53(3): 424-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1476753
  28. Lee, Y. A.(2009) Exploring socio-economic neighbourhood renewal policy in England. Journal of the Association of Korean Photo-Geographers 19(3): 99-114. https://doi.org/10.35149/jakpg.2009.19.3.009
  29. Lim, Y. R., J. M. Chu, J. Y. Shin, H. J. Bae, and C. S. Park(2009) Analysis on the accessibility to natural greenspace and urban parks by income class factors. Journal of Korea Planning Association 442(4): 133-146.
  30. Liverpool City Council(2010) Liverpool Green Infrastructure Strategy.
  31. Liverpool City Council(2018) Liverpool Local Plan 2013-2033(Presubmission draft).
  32. Maas, J., R. A. Verheij, S. de Vries, P. Spreeuwenberg, F. G. Schellevis, and P. P. Groenewegen(2009) Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 63(12): 967-973. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.079038
  33. Mayor of London(2004) The London Plan: Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London. Greater London Authority.
  34. Mayor of London(2011) The London Plan: Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London. Greater London Authority.
  35. Mayor of London(2012) The All London Green Grid. Greater London Authority.
  36. Mayor of London(2018) London Environment Strategy. Greater London Authority.
  37. Mitchell, R. and F. Popham(2008) Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. The Lancet 372(9650): 1655-1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X
  38. Moon, J., S. Lee, J. Kim, S. Min, S. Kim, and K. Park(2016) Conception, Normative Directives and Policy Tasks towards Inclusive National Territory. Research Report to Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  39. OECD(2016) The New York Proposal for Inclusive Growth in Cities. Paris: OECD.
  40. Park, I. S., C. H. Youm, and C. Y. Tchah(2009) Actors and collaboration system in English urban regeneration program: cases of single program and neighbourhood renewal program. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 25(12): 349-360.
  41. Plane, J. and F. Klodawsky(2013) Neighbourhood amenities and health: examining the significance of a local park. Social Sciences & Medicine 99: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.008
  42. Rii, H. U. and J. H. Choi(2009) Creation and utilization of green spaces in the city from the viewpoint of urban renewal. Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society 12(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.23841/egsk.2009.12.1.1
  43. RTPI(2001) A New Vision for Planning.
  44. Seo, H. J. and B. W. Jun(2011) Environmental equity analysis of the accessibility of urban neighborhood parks in Daegu city. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 14(4): 221-237. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2011.14.4.221
  45. State Affairs Planning Advisory Committee(2017) Moon Jae-in Administration's Five-year Road-map for State Affairs. State Affairs Planning Advisory Committee.
  46. The City of Edinburgh Council(2010) Open Space Strategy.
  47. The City of Edinburgh Council(2016) Open Space 2021: Edinburgh's Open Space Strategy.
  48. Walton, E.(2014) Vital places: facilitators of behavioral and social health mechanisms in low-income neighborhoods. Social Science & Medicine 122: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.10.011
  49. WHO(2012) Health Indicators of Sustainable Cities in the Context of the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development. Report to WHO.
  50. Wood, C., R. Bragg, and J. Barton(2013) Natural choices for health and wellbeing. Report to Liverpool Primary Care Trust and The Mersey Forest.
  51. World Bank(2017) Promoting Inclusive Growth by Creating Opportunities for the Urban Poor(Philippines urbanization review policy note). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
  52. Yoon, S. J.(2016) The consolidation and implementation of green infrastructure policy in urban spatial planning: Focused on the London Plan & the All London Green Grid. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(2): 83-95. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.2.083
  53. http://jumin.daegu.go.kr/budget/information/informationBudgetBill.do (Expenditure Budget Report, Daegu Metropolitan City)
  54. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1HDLF05&conn_path=I2 (KOSIS)
  55. http://lofin.mois.go.kr/portal (Local finance integrated open system)
  56. http://m.molit.go.kr/viewer/skin/doc.html?fn=e5376477e7e51aaa38f41333b50559bd&rs=/viewer/result/20181128 (Guidelines for Park and Green Space Plan[공원녹지 기본계획 수립지침])
  57. http://news.seoul.go.kr/gov/archives/category/govdata_c1/budget_c1/data_budget_c1/data_document_budget-n2 (Expenditure Budget Report, Seoul)
  58. http://www.busan.go.kr/ghstat (Expenditure Budget Report, Busan Metropolitan City)
  59. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/social-inequalities-in-environment-and-health (WHO)
  60. http://www.greenflagaward.org.uk (Green Flag Awards)
  61. http://www.gwangju.go.kr/BD_0000120200/boardList.do?menuId=gwangju0809020000 (Expenditure Budget Report, Gwangju Metropolitan City)
  62. http://www.incheon.go.kr/posts/49 (Expenditure Budget Report, Incheon Metropolitan City)
  63. http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1205 (e-country index)
  64. http://www.law.go.kr/법령/도시공원및녹지등에관한법률시행규칙 (Enforcement Decree of The Urban Parks, Green Areas, Etc. Act)
  65. http://www.ulsan.go.kr/tax/fhbudget (Expenditure Budget Report, Ulsan Metropolitan City)
  66. https://data.oecd.org/inequality (OECD Social and Welfare Statistics: Income distribution)
  67. https://minutes3.belfastcity.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=35576 (Belfast City Council Update on Open Spaces Strategy)
  68. https://www.daejeon.go.kr/bud/BudFinanceboardList.do?boardId=budboard005&menuSeq=349 (Expenditure Budget Report, Daejeon Metropolitan City)
  69. https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-planning-policy (Scottish Planning Policy)
  70. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 (National Planning Policy Framework)
  71. https://www.greenspacescotland.org.uk (Greenspace Scotland)
  72. https://www.groundwork.org.uk (Groundwork)
  73. https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/environment/parks-green-spaces-and-biodiversity/greener-city-fund (Greener City Fund)
  74. https://www.merseyforest.org.uk/our-work/natural-choices-for-health-and-wellbeing (Natural Choices for Health and Wellbeing)