DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Temperature-dependent Differences in Heading Response at Different Growth Stages of Rice

  • Lee, HyeonSeok (Crop Cultivation & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, MyoungGoo (Crop Cultivation & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, YunHo (Crop Cultivation & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Hwang, WoonHa (Crop Cultivation & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jeong, JaeHyeok (Crop Cultivation & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yang, SeoYeong (Crop Cultivation & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lim, YeonHwa (Crop Cultivation & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, ChungGen (Crop Cultivation & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, KyungJin (Crop Cultivation & Physiology Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Received : 2019.08.10
  • Accepted : 2019.08.28
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

There is an increasing frequency in the occurrence of abnormal weather phenomena such as sharp increases and decreases in temperature. Under these weather conditions, the heading time of rice changes unexpectedly, which poses problems in agriculture. Therefore, we investigated the effect of temperature on the heading response at different growth stages in rice. During the period from transplanting to heading, the plants were subjected to different temperature treatments, each for a 9-day period, to observe the heading response. For the heading date analysis, "heading date" was defined as the number of days from transplanting to the appearance of the first spikelet. We found that the influence of temperature increased in the order of rooting stage, followed by meiosis, early tillering, spikelet differentiation, and panicle initiation stage in all ecological types and cultivars. In particular, unlike the results reported previously, the effect of temperature on heading during the photo-sensitive period was very small. Meanwhile, the influence of temperature on vegetative growth response at different growth stages was not consistent with heading response. These results can be used as basic data for predicting the variation in heading date owing to temperature variation at each growth stage. In addition, we propose that the concept of day length should be included in determining the influence of temperature on the photo-sensitive period.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S. B. and V. S. Vergara. 1969. Studies on responses of the rice plant to photoperiod III. response of korean varieties. Korean Journal of Crop Science 5 : 45-49.
  2. Bernier, G. and C. Perilleux. 2005. A physiological overview of the genetics of flowering time control. Plant Biotechnol. J. 3 : 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00114.x
  3. Black, J. W. and P. Leff. 1983. Operational models of pharamacological agonism. Proc. R, Soc. Lond. B 220, 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1983.0093
  4. Breiman, L. 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45 : 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
  5. Collinson, S. T., R. H. Ellis, R. J. Summerfield, and E. H. Roberts. 1992 Durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of development to flowering in four cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annals of Botany 70 : 339-346. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088483
  6. Corbesier, L., C. Vincent, and S. Jang. 2007. FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316 : 1030-1033. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141752
  7. Dua, A. B., F. W. T. Penning de Vires, and D. V. Seshu. 1990. Simulation to support evaluation of the production potential of rice varieties in tropical climates. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 33 : 1185-1194. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31456
  8. Haniu, Y., H. Chujo, and S. Yhosida. 1983. Effect of air temperature on floral induction by short day in rice plants. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 52 : 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.52.135
  9. Ikeda, K. 1975. Studies on initiation and subsequent development of floral bud in rice plants. III. Appearance of photoperiodic sensitivity and its changes with plant age. Bull. Fac. Agri. Mie Univ. 48 : 1-8.
  10. Katayama, Y. 1971. Photoperiodism in the genus Oryza. VII. Mem. Fac. Agric. Kagoshima Univ. 8 : 299-320.
  11. Kotak, S., J. Larkindale, U. Lee, P. V. Koskull-Dorling, E. Vierling, and K. D. Scharf. 2007. Complexity of the heat stress response in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10 : 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.011
  12. Komiya, R., A. Ikegami, S. Tamaki, S. Yokoi, and K. Shimamoto. 2008. Hd3a and RFT1 are essential for flowering in rice. Development 135 : 767-774. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.008631
  13. Komiya, R., S. Yokoi, and K. Shimamoto. 2009. A gene network for long-day flowering activates RFT1 encoding a mobile flowering signal in rice. Development 136 : 3443-3450. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.040170
  14. Kovi, M. R., G. Sablok, X. Bai, M. Wendell, O. A. Rognli, H. H. Yu, and Y. Z Xing. 2013. Expression patterns of photoperiod and temperature regulated heading date genes in Oryza sativa. Computational Biology and Chemistry 45 : 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2013.03.004
  15. Lee, J. H., S. H. Park, and J. H. A, 2012. Functional conservation and diversification between rice osmads22/osmads55 and arabiopsis svp protein. Plant Science 185 : 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.09.003
  16. Loomis, R. S. and D. J. Connor. 1992. Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems. Cambridge University Press Cambridge : 104-128.
  17. Luan, W., H. Chen, Y. Fu, H. Si, W. Peng, S. Song, W. Liu, G. Hu, Z. Sun, D. Xie, and C. Sun. 2009. The effect of the cross talk between photoperiod and temperature on the heading-date in rice. PLoSONE 4, e5891. doi.:10.1371/journal.pone.0005891.
  18. Matsubayashi, M. 1963. Theory and practice of growing rice. Min of Agr. and Fores. Tokyo. Japan 3 : 77-90.
  19. Mimoto, H., M. Yanase, and H. Chujo. 1989. Varietal differences of juveninile phase duration and photoperiodic sensitivity in paddy rice. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 58 : 628-634. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.58.628
  20. Nishida, H., Y. Okumoto, H. Nakagawa, K. Ichitani, H. Inoue, T. Tnisaka. 2001. Analysis of tester lines for rice (Oryza sativa L.) heading-time genes using reciprocal photoperiodic transfer treatments. Annals of Botany 88 : 527-536. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2001.1490
  21. Roberts, E. H. and R. J. Summerfield. 1987. Measurement and prediction of flowering in annual crops. In: Atherton JG, ed. Manipulation of flowering. London: Butterworths, 17-50.
  22. Satake, T. and S. Yoshida. 1978. High temperature-induced sterility in indica rices at flowering. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 47 : 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.47.6
  23. Shi, P. H., Y. Zhu, L. Tang, J. L. Chen, T. Sun, W. X. Cao, and Y. C. Tian. 2016. Differential effects of temperature and duration of heat stress during anthesis and grain filling stages in rice. Environmental and Experimental Botany 132 : 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.08.006
  24. Song, Y. and W. Luan. 2012. Molecular regulatory network of flowering by photoperiod and temperature in rice. Rice Science 19 : 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(12)60037-7
  25. Song, Y., Z. Gao, and W. Luan. 2012. Interaction between temperature and photoperiod in regulation of flowering time in rice. Science China Life Sciences 55 : 214-249.
  26. Song, Y. H., S. Ito, and T. Imaizumi. 2013. Flowering time regulation: photoperiod and temperature-sensing in leaves. Trends in Plant Science 18 : 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2013.05.003
  27. Tamaki, S., S. Matsuo, H. L. Wong, S. Yokoi, and K. Shimamoto. 2007. Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice. Science 316 : 1033-1036. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141753
  28. Vergara, B. S., S. Puranabhavung, and R. Lilis. 1965. Factors determing the growth duration of rice varieties. Phyton 22 : 177-185.
  29. Vergara, B. S. and T. T. Chang/ 1985. The flowering response of the rice plant to photoperiod. 4th edn, Los Banos, Philippines: IRRI.
  30. Wang, J. Y. 1960. A critique of the heat unit approach to plant response studies. Ecology 41 : 785-790. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931815
  31. Wang, Y., L. Wang, J. Zhou, S. Hu, H. Chen, J. Xiang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zeng, Q. Shi, D. Zhu, and Y. Zhang.2019. Research progress on heat stress of rice at flowering stage. Rice Science 26 : 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2018.06.009
  32. Yamamoto, T., H. Lin, T. Sasaki, and M. Yano. 2000. Identification of heading date quantitative trait locus Hd6 and characterization of its epistatic interactions with Hd2 in rice using advanced backcross progeny. Genetics 154 : 885-891. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/154.2.885
  33. Yang, Z., L. Jin, H. Zhu, S. Wang, G. Zhang, and G. Liu. 2018. Analysis of epistasis among QTLs on heading date based on single segment substitution lines in rice. Scientific Reports 8, 3059. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20690-w
  34. Yano, M., Y. Harushima, Y. Nagamura, N. Kurata, Y. Minobe, and T. Sasaki. 1997. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling heading date in rice using a high-density linkage map. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95 : 1025-1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050658
  35. Yin, X., M. J. Kropff, and J. Goudriaan. 1996. Differential effects of day and night temperature on development to flowering in rice. Annals of Botany 77 : 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0024
  36. Yin, X., M. J. Kropff, and J. Goudriaan. 1997. Changes in temperature sensitivity of development from sowing to flowering in rice. Crop Science 37 : 1787-1794. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700060021x
  37. Yin, X., M. J. Kropff, T. Horie, H. Nakagawa, H. G. S. Centeno, D. Zhu, and J. Goudriaan. 1997. A model for photothermal responses of flowering in rice I. Model description and parameterization. Field Crops Research 51, 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(96)03456-9
  38. Yoshida, S. 1981. Fundamentals of rice crop science. IRRI, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, 269.
  39. Yoshida, S. and Y. Hanyu. 1964. Critical daylength for rice plants in realtion to temperature [in japanese]. Proc. Kinki Symp. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. Soc. 9 : 34-36.

Cited by

  1. 농가재배 주요 벼 품종들의 출수에 영향을 미치는 온도 반응과 한계일장 구명 연구 vol.64, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2019.64.4.323