A Study on the Scope of the Word '古文' and '古篆' Definition in the Joseon Period

試論朝鮮時代'古文'及'古篆'定義的範圍

Through the articles written by the Joseon literati, this article first sorts out the sources and definitions of related words, then examines the specific sentence adopted by the Joseon literati, and clarifies the Joseon literati's understanding of philological related words. This article will specifically analyze the concepts of '古文' and '古篆', analyze the similarities and differences between them, and explore the reasons for the differences. This article will use the Korean classical collection of Korean classical integrated DB, as well as the documents of the Cheng zheng diary(承政院日記) and the Joseon dynasty sillok(朝鮮王朝實錄Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty) and so on. This article will analyze the following steps: First, sort out the general definition of '古文' and '古篆'; secondly, analyze the concept of '古文' and '古篆' in Korean literature; again, through the contact of Joseon scholars , The word font is used to discuss the concepts and differences between 'Gu Wen(古文)' and 'Gu Zhuan(古篆)'; finally, the specific scope of 'Gu Wen(古文)' and 'Gu Zhuan(古篆)' in the Joseon Period.

本文透過朝鮮時代文人所寫的文章, 先整理文字學相關詞語的來源及其定義, 再考察朝鮮文人所接觸的字書所採取的具體字形, 闡明朝鮮文人對文字學相關詞語的理解。本文將特別針對'古文'及'古篆'概念進行分析, 分析兩者的異同點, 並探討發生差異的原因。