DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Fragility Assessment of NPP Containment Structure based on Conditional Mean Spectra for Multiple Earthquake Scenarios

다중 지진 시나리오를 고려한 원전 격납구조물의 조건부 평균 스펙트럼 기반 지진취약도 평가

  • Park, Won Ho (Department of Architectural Design and Engineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Hun (Division of Architecture and Urban Design, Incheon National University)
  • 박원호 (인천대학교 일반대학원 건축학과) ;
  • 박지훈 (인천대학교 도시건축학부)
  • Received : 2019.08.05
  • Accepted : 2019.10.07
  • Published : 2019.11.01

Abstract

A methodology to assess seismic fragility of a nuclear power plant (NPP) using a conditional mean spectrum is proposed as an alternative to using a uniform hazard response spectrum. Rather than the single-scenario conditional mean spectrum, which is the conventional conditional mean spectrum based on a single scenario, a multi-scenario conditional mean spectrum is proposed for the case in which no single scenario is dominant. The multi-scenario conditional mean spectrum is defined as the weighted average of different conditional mean spectra, each one of which corresponds to an individual scenario. The weighting factors for scenarios are obtained from a deaggregation of seismic hazards. As a validation example, a seismic fragility assessment of an NPP containment structure is performed using a uniform hazard response spectrum and different single-scenario conditional mean spectra and multi-scenario conditional mean spectra. In the example, the number of scenarios primarily influences the median capacity of the evaluated structure. Meanwhile, the control frequency, a key parameter of a conditional mean spectrum, plays an important role in reducing logarithmic standard deviation of the corresponding fragility curves and corresponding high confidence of low probability of failure (HCLPF) capacity.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim MK, Choi IK. Effect of Evaluation Response Spectrum on the Seismic Risk of Structure. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2009 Dec;13(6):39-46.
  2. Hahm D, Seo JM, Choi IK, Rhee HM. Uniform Hazard Spectrum Evaluation Method for Nuclear Power Plants on Soil Sites based on the Hazard Spectra of Bedrock Sites. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2012 Jun;16(3):35-42.
  3. Choi IK, Choun YS, Ahn SM, Seo JM. Probabilistic seismic risk analysis of CANDU containment structure near-fault earthquakes. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. Republic of Korea. 2008 Jun;238(6):1382-1391.
  4. Choi IK, Seo JM. Inelastic Energy Absorption Factor for the Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment of NPP Containment Structure. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2001 Oct;5(5):47-56.
  5. Cho SG, Joe YH. Seismic fragility analyses of nuclear power plant structures based on the recorede earthquake data in Korea. Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Republic of Korea. 2005 Aug; 235(17-19):1867-1874.
  6. Joe YH, Cho SG. Seismic Fragility Analysis of Multi-Modes Structures Condiderin Modal Contribution Factor. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2002 Aug;6(4):15-22. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2002.6.4.015
  7. Choi IK, Ahn SM, Choun YS. Seismic Fragility Analysis of PSC Containment Building by Nonlinear Anaysis. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. 2006 Feb;10(1):63-74.
  8. Baker JW. Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2011 Mar;137(3): 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000215
  9. Renault P. PEGASOS refinement project: new findings and challenges from a PSHA for Swiss Nuclear Power Plants, Transactions, SMiRT 21. 2011 Nov;Div-IV:Paper ID# 561.
  10. Haselton CB, Baker JW, Stewart JP, Whittaker AS, Luco N, Fry A, Hamburger RO, Zimmerman RB, Hooper JD, Charney FA, Pekelnicky RG. Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP provisions and ASCE/SEI 7 Standard: part I - overviwe and Specification of Ground Motions. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):373-395.
  11. Haselton CB, Fry A, Hamburger RO, Baker JW, Zimmerman RB, Luco N, Elwood KJ, Hooper JD, Charney FA, Pekelinicky RG, Whittaker AS. Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCD/SEI 7 Standard:Part II-Structural Aanlysis Procedures and Acceptance Criteria. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):397-417.
  12. Zimmerman RB, Baker JW, Hooper JD, Bono S, Haselton CB, Engel A, Hamburger RO, Celikbas A, Jalalian A. Response History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCD/SEI 7 Standard : Part III - Example Applications Illustrating the Recommended Methodology. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):419-447.
  13. Jarrett JA, Zimmerman RB, Charney FA, Jalalian A. Response-History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings in the NEHRP Provisions and ASCE/SEI 7 Sthandard: Part IV-A Study of Assumptions. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. 2017 May;33(2):449-468.
  14. ASCE/SEI 7-16. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Creteria for Buildings and other Structures. c2017.
  15. Korea Electrical Power Corporation, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., LTD. APR1400 DESIGN CONTROL DOCUMENT TIER2. APR1400-K-X-FS-14002-NP REVISION 0. Republic of Korea. c2014.
  16. Regulatory guide 1.208. a perfomance-based approcach to define the site-specific earthquake ground motion. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. c2007.
  17. Atkinson GM, Boore DM. Earthquake Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 2006; 96(6):2181-2205. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120050245
  18. Jayaram N, Lin T, Baker JW. A Computationally Efficient Ground-Motion Selection Algorithm for Matching a Target Response Spectrum Mean and Variance. Earthquake Spectra. 2011 Aug; 27(3):797-815. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3608002
  19. Reed JW, Kennedy RP. Methodology for developing seismic fragilities, EPRI TR-103959. Electric Power Research Institute. Palo Alto. CA. c1994.
  20. Ogaki Y, Kobayashi M, Takeda T, Yamaguchi T, Yoshizaki K, Sugano S. Shear strength tests of prestressed concrete containment vessels. SMiRT-6. 1981;13(22)J4/3.
  21. ASME. Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Division 2, Code for Concrete Containments. c2015.