Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis for Effectiveness of Cigarette Warning Picture and Message - Focusing on Smoker, Non-smoker, Ex-smoker

담뱃갑 경고그림 및 메시지 효과 분석 - 흡연자, 비흡연자와 금연자를 중심으로

  • Seo, Yon-Hee (Department of Nursing, Yeoju Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Jin (Department of Aviation Maintenance, Catholic Kwandong University)
  • 서연희 (여주대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 김우진 (가톨릭관동대학교 항공정비학과)
  • Received : 2019.08.01
  • Accepted : 2019.10.20
  • Published : 2019.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is a descriptive study for analyzing cigarette warning picture and message effect according to smoking status (smoking, non-smoking, ex-smoking). A total of 219 subjects participated in the study. Data collection was conducted from June 4, 2017 to June 14, 2017. The survey was conducted by using the 10 cigarette warning pictures(heart disease, stroke, lung cancer, laryngeal cancer, oral cancer) and cigarette warning messages selected by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 2016. The results of the study showed that there was a statistically significant difference in smoking cessation intention between smoking, non-smoker and ex-smoker groups after exposure of smoking warning picture and cigarette warning message(F=36.08, p<.001). Therefore, it is suggested that the contents of cigarette warning picture and warning messages including T.V Anti-Smoking Public Service Announcement need to be replaced regularly in order to improve the smoking cessation of smokers according to National Health Promotion Act.

본 연구는 흡연 여부(흡연집단, 비흡연집단, 금연집단)에 따른 담뱃갑 경고그림 및 메시지 효과를 분석하기 위한 서술적 조사이다. 연구대상자는 G도에 거주하는 성인 대상으로 총 219명이 참여하였다. 자료수집은 2017년 6월 4일부터 6월 14일까지 실시하였다. 연구진행 방법은 보건복지부의 경고그림위원회에서 선정한 2016년 담뱃갑 경고그림과 경고메세지 10종(심장질환, 뇌졸중, 폐암, 후두암, 구강암 등)을 활용하여 설문조사를 실시하였다. 연구결과는 담뱃갑 경고그림과 경고메시지의 노출 후 흡연여부에 따른 금연의도는 흡연자, 비흡연자와 금연자 그룹 간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다(F=36.08, p<.001). 따라서 국민건강증진법에 따라 흡연자의 금연 효과를 향상시키기 위하여 TV 금연공익광고를 포함한 담뱃갑 경고그림 및 경고메시지를 주기적으로 교체할 것을 제언한다.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization. (2015). Tabacco Fact sheet. No. 339. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs339/en/,
  2. National Cancer Center. (2016). http://www.ncc.re.kr/
  3. US Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). How tobacco smoke causes disease: the biology and behavioral basis for smok-ing-attributable disease: a report of the surgeon general . http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco.
  4. H. J. Kim, T. K. Park, S. H. Jee, H. Y. Kang & C. M. Nam. (2001). Analysis of Socioeconomic Costs of Smoking in Korea. Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(3), 183-190.
  5. Canadian Cancer Society.(2014), Cigarette Package Health Warnings: International Status Report. http://global.tobaccofreekids.org/files/pdfs/en/WL_st atus_report_en.pdf.
  6. S. H. Choi, Y. J. Kim & K. G. Oh. (2018). Tobacco Control Policy and Smoking Trends in Korea. KCDC Public Health Weekly Report 10(21), 530-533.
  7. S. H. Choi, J. H. Lee, Y. J. Kim & K. G. Oh. (2018). Awareness and impact on smoking-related behaviors of graphic health warnings on cigarette packs among adolescents. KCDC Public Health Weekly Report 11(22), 707-711.
  8. J. H. Ha & M. K. Kim. (2018). The Effect of Felt Emotions from Graphic Cigarette Warning Labels on Smoker's Quitting Intention. Journal of Public Relations, 22(2), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2018.22.2.101
  9. K. Witte. (1998). Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal success and failures. In P. A. Anderson and L. K. Guerrero (Eds). The Handbook of communication and Emotion, 423-450. New York: Academic Press.
  10. H. J. Paek. (2016). How Fear and Perceived Effectiveness of Antismoking Messages Affect Smokers' Quitting Intention. Journal of Public Relations, 20(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2016.20.2.1
  11. P. Dillard & E. Peck. (2000). Affect and persuasion emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27(4), 461-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027004003
  12. J. P. Dillard, K. M. Weber & R. G. Vail. (2007). The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications of formative campaign research. Journal of Communication, 57, 613-631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00360.x
  13. H. J. Paek, T. Hove, M. Kim & H. Jeong. (2011). Mechanisms of child abuse public service announcement effectiveness: Roles of emotional response and perceived effectiveness. Health Communication, 26(6), 534-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.558334
  14. M. C. Yzer, K. D. Vohs, M. Luciana, B. N. Cuthbert & A. W. MacDonald. (2011). Affective antecedents of the perceived effectiveness of antidrug advertisements: An analysis of adolescents' momentary and restrospective evaluations. Prevention Science, 12(3), 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0212-y
  15. M. S. Jeong, J. S. Yoo & S. S. Cho. (2007). Effects of Message Type and Product Involvement on Consumer's Attitude Change : Advertising vs Publicity. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 18(3), 29-51.
  16. G. E. Hwang. (2014). Persuasive Effect of Anti-Smoking Ad by Fear Level and the Type of Endorser: Moderating Role of the Type of Target Audience. master's thesis. Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  17. S. Azagba & M. F. Sharaf. (2013). The effect of graphic cigarette warning labels on smoking behavior: evidence from the Canadian experience. Nicotine Tob Res, 15(3), 708-717. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts194
  18. J. Huang, F. J. Chaloupka & G. T. Fong. (2014). Cigarette graphic warning labels and smoking prevalence in Canada: a critical examination and reformulation of the FDA regulatory impact analysis. Tob Control. 23(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050479
  19. N. I. Park, J. Y. Jeong, J. W. Moon, J. H. Jeong & A. H. Park. (2018). Effects of Pictorial Cigarette Pack Warnings on Smokers and Nonsmoker's Perceptions of Treat Appeal and Willingness to Quit Smoking. Journal of communication research, 55(4), 252-291. https://doi.org/10.22174/jcr.2018.55.4.252
  20. H. S. Park. (2013) A Study of Smoking Behaviors of College Students: With Special Reference to Warning Labels and Warning Pictograms. master's thesis. Dongguk University, Seoul.
  21. I. Ajzen. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision process, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  22. Y. O. Jee. (1993). Testing theory of planned behavior in the prediction of smoking cessation behavior among military smokers. dissertation. Yonsei University, Seoul.
  23. M, J. Oh. (2016). A study on persuasive effect of pictorial warning labels on the cigarette package by smoking status. master's thesis. Hanyang University, Seoul.
  24. J. C. Andrews, R. G. Netemeyer, J. Kees & S. Burton. (2014). How graphic visual helath warnings affect young smokers' thoughts of quitting. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(2), 165-183. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0092
  25. J. W. Park, K. H. Kwon, D. J. Kim & S. W. Chun. (2016). Emotional and Cognitive Responses to Graphic Pictorial Health Warnings on Tabacco Packaging: A Comparison of Smikers and Nonsmokers. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 27(7), 7-30.
  26. L. F. Emery, D. Romer, K. M. Sheerin, K. H. Jamieson & E. Peters. (2014). Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 16(3), 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntt124
  27. A. T. Evans, E. Peters, A. A. Strasser, L. F. Emery, K. M. Sheerin & D. Romer. (2015). Graphic warning labels elicit affective and thoughtful reponses from smokers: Results of a randomized clinical trial. PloS One, 10(12), e0142879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142879
  28. Y. J. Choi. (2014). An Exploratory Study of the Effectiveness of Cigarette Warning Label On the Basis of the Effects of Fear, Disgust, Anger on Attitudes and Behavioral Intention. Journal of Public Relations, 18(1), 151-187. https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2014.18.1.151