Journal of Convergence for Information Technology (융합정보논문지)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Research on PBL Implementation Strategy of Faculty Members Selected as a PBL Best Practicer

PBL 우수 사례자로 선정된 교수들의 수업운영 전략 탐색

  • Received : 2019.09.19
  • Accepted : 2019.10.20
  • Published : 2019.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine about PBL implementation strategies employed by faculty members who have successfully managed PBL class. By adopting the inductive content analysis, this study has analyzed the contents related with the strategies about PBL implementation in the course result reports and best practice presentation materials made by 6 professors selected as a PBL best practicer of B university from the 2017 to the 2018. After the analysis, it is revealed that PBL best practicers have used 13 strategies in domain of classroom culture, learning facilitation, and assessment. The following further studies and supports have been suggest: First, a study on PBL best practice faculty member's implementation strategies should be further expanded. Second, a comparative study on the PBL implementation strategies between PBL best practice faculty members and general faculty members should be launched. Third, an organizational system to share PBL best practice faculty member's implementation strategies should be supported.

본 연구의 목적은 대학교에서 PBL 수업을 우수하게 운영하는 교수들의 수업운영 전략을 탐색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 충남에 위치한 B대학에서 2017년 1학기, 2학기, 2018년 1학기동안 PBL 우수 사례자로 선정된 교수 6명이 작성한 수업결과 보고서와 사례발표회 발표 자료를 활용하여 수업운영 전략 관련 내용을 귀납적 분석방법을 통해 분석하였다. 연구결과 PBL 우수 사례자로 선정된 교수들은 수업운영 시 교실문화, 학습촉진, 평가의 3개 영역과 관련하여 13개의 전략을 사용하고 있음이 규명되었다. 향후 필요한 연구와 지원을 제안하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, PBL을 우수하게 운영하는 교수들의 수업운영 전략에 대한 연구가 보다 확대되어야 한다. 둘째, PBL을 우수하게 운영하는 교수들과 일반교수들의 운영전략에 관한 비교연구가 수행되어야 한다. 셋째, 조직 차원에서 PBL을 우수하게 운영하는 교수들의 수업운영 전략을 공유할 수 있는 시스템이 지원되어야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. C. B. Frey & M. A. Osborne. (2017). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114(C), 254-280. DOI : 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
  2. S. Boss. (2013). PBL for 21st century success. Novato: Buck Institute for Education.
  3. J. H. Lee et al. (2016). A Education Innovation using Project Based Learning. Sejong : KDI.
  4. M. H. Shin & D. S. Choi. (2019). Project-based learning and learner interaction by web convergency communication types. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 10(2), 35-40. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2019.10.2.035
  5. B. Condliffe et al. (2017). Project-Based Learning A Literature Review. New York : MDRC.
  6. Y. Oh. (2017). The meaning exploration of project instruction case. The Journal of Korean Education, 44(1), 5-32.
  7. M. R. Kim. (2017). Policy Diagnosis and Plan for the Innovation of Higher Education. Sejong : Ministry of Education.
  8. S. K. Park. (2018). The 4thindustrial revolution and Korean university's role change. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(1), 235-242. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.1.235
  9. M. S. Choi. (2018). Convergence study about improvement of communication ability and problem-solving applying project-based learning on community dental hygiene practice education. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(6), 67-74. DOI : 10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.6.067
  10. P. C. Blumenfeld et al. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369-398. DOI : 10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8
  11. J. R. Mergendoller & J. W. Thomas. (2000). Managing project based learning: principles from the field. Presentation to the 2000 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (pp. 1-51). New Orleans : AERA.
  12. J. Y. Kim. (2018). A study on UX design process lecture based on modified PBL(Problem-Based Learning). Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(1), 117-131. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.1.117
  13. P. A. Ertmer & K. D. Simons. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: supporting the efforts of K-12 teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 40-54. DOI : 10.7771/1541-5015.1005
  14. S. R. Tamim & M. M. Grant. (2013). Definitions and uses: case study of teachers implementing project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2), 72-101. DOI : 10.7771/1541-5015.1323
  15. Y. H. Lee & Y. H. Hang. (2019). Suggestion of RI (IR) -DCA project model and investigation about teachers' awareness about activating the student-centered project. Journal of Education & Culture, 25(2), 175-202. DOI : 10.24159/joec.2019.25.2.175
  16. S. H. Park & P. A. Ertmer. (2008). Examining barriers in technology-enhanced problem-based learning: using a performance support systems approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 631-643. DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00858.x
  17. S. A. Gallagher. (1997). Problem-based learning: where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 332-362. DOI : 10.1177/016235329702000402
  18. C. Ames & J. Archer.(1988). Achievement goal in the classroom: students' learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267. DOI : 10.1037//0022-0663.80.3.260
  19. C. E. Hmelo-Silver. (2004) Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. DOI : 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
  20. W. C. Parker et al. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1424-1459. DOI : 10.3102/0002831213504237
  21. H. J. Keum. (2016). The basic theoretical research for a practice of university faculty member's teaching reflection. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(2), 57-63. DOI : 10.14400/jdc.2016.14.2.57