Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Relationship among Corporate entrepreneurship, R&D capacity and Technology commercialization capacity of administrative position - Moderating effect of Technology orientation -

관리직의 사내기업가정신과 연구개발역량, 기술사업화역량의 관계에 관한 연구 - 기술지향성의 조절효과 -

  • Koh, Yoon-Ho (Consulting School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Song, Chan-Sub (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 고윤호 (금오공과대학교 컨설팅학과) ;
  • 송찬섭 (금오공과대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2018.08.01
  • Accepted : 2019.10.20
  • Published : 2019.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the capacities of innovation in the organization, and to examine the effects of corporate entrepreneurship, R&D capability, technology commercialization capacity and technology orientation. First, the research model and hypothesis were established based on the literature research and 153 questionnaires were distributed and collected among management office workers among manufacturing workers in Kyungbuk. The results of this study confirm that the corporate entrepreneurship positively affects R&D capacity and that R&D capacity has a positive effect on technology commercialization capacity. And we confirmed the significant moderating effect of technology orientation. However, there is no mediating effect of R&D capability on the relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and technology commercialization. These findings can provide guidelines for organizational management in the cultural aspect by identifying the effects of in-house entrepreneurship and technology orientation on cultivating the innovation capacity of management office at the organizational level.

본 연구는 조직에서 혁신을 창출하는 역량에 대해 구성원을 중심으로 분석하고자 하여 사내기업가정신과 연구개발역량, 기술사업화역량의 관계와 기술지향성의 조절효과를 실증분석하였다. 먼저 문헌연구를 바탕으로 연구모형 및 가설을 설정하였고, 경북에서 제조업 종사자 가운데 관리사무직을 대상으로 153부의 설문지를 배포 회수하여 구조방정식을 통한 조절효과 검증을 시행하였다. 연구결과, 사내기업가정신은 연구개발역량에 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 연구개발역량은 기술사업화역량에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것을 확인하였다. 그리고 기술지향성의 유의한 조절효과를 확인하였다. 하지만 사내기업가정신과 기술사업화의 관계에서 연구개발역량의 매개효과는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과는 특히, 조직 차원에서 관리사무직의 혁신역량을 함양하는데 사내기업가정신과 기술지향성의 효과를 파악함으로써 문화적 측면에서 조직 관리에 대한 가이드라인을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of SMEs ans Startups. (2017). Technology Roadmap for SME 2017-2019, Smart factory. Deajeon.
  2. J. Barney. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  3. T. Ravichandran & C. Lertwongsatien. (2005). Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 237-276 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820
  4. R. C. M. Yam, W. Lo, E. P. Y. Tang & A. K. W. Lau. (2011). Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Research Policy, 40(3), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.013
  5. L. V. Ngo. & A. O'Cass. (2012). In search of innovation and customer-related performance superiority: The role of market orientation, marketing capability, and innovation capability interactions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 861-877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00939.x
  6. C. Camison & A. Villar-Lopez. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891-2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
  7. B. Han, Y. Cho, C. Song, E. Kim & S. Lee. (2018). A study of the relationship of Entrepreneurship, Absorptive capacity and Creative product. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(10), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.10.187
  8. B. Antoncic & R. D. Hisrich. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00054-3
  9. N. Oly Ndubisi & K. Iftikhar. (2012). Relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and performance : Comparing small and medium-size enterprises. Journal of Research in Marketing & Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 214-236. https://doi.org/10.1108/14715201211271429
  10. H. Zhan, J. Kim, H. Wang & Y. Lee. (2018). The Effect of Intrapreneurship on the Organizational Performance: Focused on the Mediating Effects of Open Innovation -Focused on small and medium enterprises in Busan-. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(3), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.3.101
  11. H. Gatignon & J. M. Xuereb. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400107
  12. G. T. Lumpkin & G. G. Dess. (1996). Enriching the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct-A Reply to" Entrepreneurial Orientation or Pioneer Advantage". JSTOR.
  13. J. C. Goodale, D. F. Kuratko, J. S. Hornsby & J. G. Covin. (2011). Operations management and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating effect of operations control on the antecedents of corporate entrepreneurial activity in relation to innovation performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.07.005
  14. Y. Chen, Y. Wang, S. Nevo, J. Benitez-Amado & G. Kou. (2015). IT capabilities and product innovation performance: The roles of corporate entrepreneurship and competitive intensity. Information & Management, 52(6), 643-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.05.003
  15. R. K. Kazanjian, R. Drazin & M. A. Glynn. (2017). Implementing strategies for corporate entrepreneurship: A knowledge-based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset, 173-199.
  16. M. Jimenez-Barrionuevo, L. M. Molina & V. J. Garcia-Morales. (2019). Combined Influence of Absorptive Capacity and Corporate Entrepreneurship on Performance. Sustainability, 11(11), 3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113034
  17. D. F. Kuratko, J. S. Hornsby & J. Hayton. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: the innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9630-8
  18. S. R. Lassen. M. M. Steele & W. Sailor, W. (2006). The relationship of school-wide Positive Behavior Support to academic achievement in an urban middle school. Psychology in the Schools, 43(6), 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20177
  19. D. Miller. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
  20. Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. (1981). The Management of Innovation, Tavistock, London, 1961. Burns The Management of Innovation 1961.
  21. G. G. Dess & G. T. Lumpkin. (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434432.00015
  22. R. C. M. Yam, J. C. Guan, K. F. Pun & E. P. Y. Tang. (2004). An audit of technological innovation capabilities in Chinese firms: Some empirical findings in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 33(8), 1123-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.004
  23. J. Guan & N. Ma. (2003). Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 23(9), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00013-5
  24. C. Wang, I. Lu & C. Chen. (2008). Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation, 28(6), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.007
  25. K. Hwang. (2015). Analysis of Relation between Technology Commercialization Capacity, R & D Capacity, Innovation and Export Performance of Companies: Focused on companies that introduced technology at government - funded research institutes in Daedeok Innopolis. Journal of International Trade, 40 (1), 285-309.
  26. S. Song, M. Kwon & S. Shin. (2009). Effects of R & D Capability and Organizational Management Effort on R & D Expenditure Performance. Accounting Information Research, 27(3), 151-178.
  27. A.Pakes & Z. Griliches. (1980). Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report. Economics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(80)90136-6
  28. K. H. Tsai. (2005). R&D productivity and firm size: A nonlinear examination. Technovation, 25(7), 795-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.12.004
  29. L. Berchicci. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
  30. S. Ren, A. B. Eisingerich & H. T. Tsai, (2015). How do marketing, research and development capabilities, and degree of internationalization synergistically affect the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)? A panel data study of Chinese SMEs. International Business Review, 24(4), 642-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.006
  31. S. K. Kim, B. G. Lee, B. S. Park & K. S. Oh. (2011). THE EFFECT OF R&D, TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION CAPABILITIES AND INNOVATION PERFORMANCE Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17(4), 563-578. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2011.603481
  32. C. Dorf Richard & H. Byers Thomas. (2005). Technology ventures: from idea to enterprise. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  33. S. A. Zahra, D. F. Jennings & D. F. Kuratko. (1999). The Antecedents and Consequences of Firm-Level Entrepreneurship: The State of the Field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(2), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902400205
  34. C. Yun. (2009). International Management: A Study on the Factors Affecting the Performance of Korean Venture Firms: Focusing on International Entrepreneurship and Business Capability. International Area Studies, 13 (2), 445-474.
  35. K. Z. Zhou, G. Y. Gao, Z. Yang & N. Zhou. (2005). Developing strategic orientation in China: antecedents and consequences of market and innovation orientations. Journal of Business Research, 58(8), 1049-1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.02.003
  36. R. Deshpande, J. U. Farley & F. E. Webster Jr. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299305700102
  37. D. Jeong. (2012). The Effects of Technology Orientation on Product Quality, Technological Capability, Innovation Speed and NP Performance: Moderating Effect of Order of Market Entry. Marketing Bulletin, 20(3), 129-153. https://www.earticle.net/Article/A184282
  38. Y. M. Zhai, W. Q. Sun, S. B. Tsai, Z, Wang, Y. Zhao & Q. Chen. (2018). An Empirical Study on Entrepreneurial Orientation, Absorptive Capacity, and SMEs' Innovation Performance: A Sustainable Perspective. Sustainability, 10(2), 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020314
  39. K. Atuahene-Gima. & A. Ko. (2001). An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation. Organization Science, 12(1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.54.10121
  40. J. G. Covin & D. P. Slevin. (1986). The development and testing of an organizational-level entrepreneurship scale. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1(3), 628-639.
  41. J. C. Narver, S. F. Slater, J. C. Narver & S. F. Slater. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757
  42. S. H. Hong. (2000). The Criteria and Criteria for Selecting the Fit Index of Structural Equation Model. Journal of the Korean Psychological Association, 19(1), 161-177.
  43. C. Fornell & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  44. C. Song, S. Lee, Y. Kim & E. Kang. (2016). A Study on the influence of Self-Efficacy to Goal Setting in the age of Convergence: Focusing on the Self-regulatory depletion and non-depletion group. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 151-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.3.151
  45. I. Kim, K. Yoo. & Y. Kim. (2017). A Study on the Effects of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Activities of Venture Enterprises on the Increase Firms' Revenue. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(12), 329-341. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.12.329
  46. W. Sim, E. Jang & K. Noh. (2019). The Effect of Transformational Leadership's Sub-factors on Innovative Behavior : The Mediating Effect of Job Engagement. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(5), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.5.104
  47. J. Kim. (2017). The Convergence of the Servant Leadership of SMEs on Interpersonal Relations of University Students. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 7(4), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2017.7.4.165
  48. J. Kim & K. Park. (2018). Relations between Intrapreneurship and Emotional Intelligence, Supportive Leadership and Adaptation Performance in Organization. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(11), 289-301. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.11.289
  49. J. Y. Choi. (2018). A Study on the Moderating Effect of Absorptive Capacity of Venture Firms on Technological Innovation Performance. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.1.125
  50. S. I. Choi & D. I. Kim. (2017). The Entrepreneurship of Convergence Companies Affect Learning Orientation. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(4), 243-250. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.4.243
  51. Y. H. Cho, B. C. Han, E. K. Kim, C. Song & S. K. Lee. (2018). A Study on the Moderating Effects of Motivation in Technological Entrepreneurship, Absorption Capacity and Creative Product in the Convergence Era. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(12), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.12.243