Advances in concrete construction

  • 제8권2호
  • /
  • Pages.77-90
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2287-5301(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-531X(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental damage evaluation of prototype infill wall based on forced vibration test

  • Onat, Onur (Department of Civil Engineering, Munzur University, Aktuluk Campus)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.23
  • 심사 : 2019.03.30
  • 발행 : 2019.10.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper aims to investigate vibration frequency decrease (vibration period elongation) of reinforced concrete (RC) structure with unreinforced infill wall and reinforced infill wall exposed to progressively increased artificial earthquake load on shaking table. For this purpose, two shaking table experiments were selected as a case study. Shaking table experiments were carried on 1:1 scaled prototype one bay one storey RC structure with infill walls. The purpose of this shaking table experiment sequence is to assess local behavior and progressive collapse mechanism. Frequency decrease and eigen-vector evolution are directly related to in-plane and out-of-plane bearing capacities of infill wall enclosure with reinforced concrete frame. Firstly, frequency decrease-damage relationship was evaluated on the base of experiment results. Then, frequency decrease and stiffness degradation were evaluated with applied Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) by considering strength deterioration. Lastly, eigenvector evolution-local damage and eigenvector evolution-frequency decrease relationship was investigated. Five modes were considered while evaluating damage and frequency decrease of the tested specimens. The relationship between frequency decrease, stiffness degradation and damage level were presented while comparing with Unreinforced Brick Infill (URB) and Reinforced Infill wall with Bed Joint Reinforcement (BJR) on the base of natural vibration frequency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Al-Nimry, H., Resheidat, M. and Al-Jamal, M. (2014), "Ambient vibration testing of low and medium rise infilled RC frame buildings in Jordan", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 59, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.002
  2. Altunisik, A.C., Bayraktar, A. and Sevim, B. (2011), "Output-only system identification of post tensioned segmental concrete highway bridge", J. Bridge Eng., 16(2), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000150
  3. Amanat, K.M. and Hoque, E. (2006), "A rationale for determining the natural period of RC building frames having infill", Eng. Struct., 28(4), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.004
  4. Asteris, P.G., Repapis, C.C., Cavaleri, L., Sarhosis, V. and Athanasopoulou, A. (2015), "On the fundamental period of infilled RC frame buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 54(6), 1175-1200. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.54.6.1175
  5. Asteris, P.G., Repapis, C.C., Tsaris, A.K., Di Trapani, F. and Cavaleri, L. (2015), "Parameters affecting the fundamental period of infilled RC frame structures", Earthq. Struct., 9(5), 999-1028. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.5.999
  6. Chiauzzi, L., Masi, A., Mucciarelli, M., Cassidy, J.F., Kutyn, K., Traber, J., Ventura C. and Yao, F. (2012), "Estimate of fundamental period of reinforced concrete buildings: code provisions vs. experimental measures in Victoria and Vancouver (BC, Canada)", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 3033, Lisboa.
  7. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2000), "Building period formulas for estimating seismic displacements", Earthq. Spectra 16(2), 533-536. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586125
  8. Crowley, H. and Pinho, R. (2004), "Period-height relationship for existing european reinforced concrete buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(1), 93-119.
  9. Ditommaso, R., Gallipoli, M.R. and Mucciarelli, M. (2013), "Evaluation and considerations about fundamental periods of damaged reinforced concrete buildings", Nat. Hazard. Earth Syst. Sci., 13(7), 1903. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1903-2013
  10. Eleftheriadou, A.K., Karabinis, A.I. and Baltzopoulou, A.D. (2012), "Fundamental period versus seismic damage for reinforced concrete buildings", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa.
  11. Foti, D., Gattulli, V. and Potenza, F. (2014), "Output-only identification and model updating by dynamic testing in unfavorable conditions of a seismically damaged building", Comput. Aid. Civil Infrastr. Eng., 29(9), 659-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12071
  12. Gallipoli, M.R., Mucciarelli, M. and Vona, M. (2009), "Empirical estimate of fundamental frequencies and damping for Italian buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(8), 973-988. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.878
  13. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (1997), "Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 123(11), 1454-1461. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:11(1454)
  14. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (1998), "Period formulas for concrete shear wall buildings", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 124(4), 426-433. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:4(426)
  15. Goncalves, A.M.N., Guerreiro, L.M.C., Candeias, P., Ferreira, J.G. and Costa, A.C. (2018), "Characterization of reinforced timber masonry walls in "Pombalino" buildings with dynamic tests", Eng. Struct., 166, 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.036
  16. Guler, K., Yuksel, E. and Kocak, A. (2008), "Estimation of the fundamental vibration period of existing RC buildings in Turkey utilizing ambient vibration records", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(S2), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802013909
  17. Kocak, A. and Yildirim, M.K. (2011), "Effects of infill wall ratio on the period of reinforced concrete framed buildings", Adv. Struct. Eng., 14(5), 731-743. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.14.5.731
  18. Kocak, A., Borekci, M. and Zengin, B. (2018), "Period formula for RC frame buildings considering infill wall thickness and elasticity modulus", Scientia Iranica. Tran. A, Civil Eng., 25(1), 118-128.
  19. Leite, J.K. (2014), "Seismic behaviour of infill walls: Design and testing", PhD Thesis, Universidade of Minho, Guimaraes, Portugal,.
  20. Leite, J.M., Correia, A.A., Lourenco, P.B., Vintzileou, E., Palieraki, V., Candeias, P.X., Campos-Costa, A. and Coelho, E. (2015), "Assessment of innovative solutions for non-load bearing masonry enclosures", Chapter 16 of Experimental Research in Earthquake Engineering, Ed. F. Taucer, Springer Bbook Series Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering.
  21. Masi, A. and Vona, M. (2010), "Experimental and numerical evaluation of the fundamental period of undamaged and damaged RC framed buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 8(3), 643-656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9136-3
  22. Mendes, P. and Oliveira, S. (2008), "Analise dinamica de estruturas. Utilizacao integrada de modelos de identificacao modal e modelos de elementos finitos", ITB ADE 16, Laboratorio Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisboa. (in Portuguese)
  23. Onat, O. (2019), "Fundamental vibration frequency prediction of historical masonry bridges", Struct. Eng. Mech., 69(2), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.12989/SEM.2019.69.2.155
  24. Onat, O. and Gul, M. (2018), "Application of Artificial Neural Networks to the prediction of out-of-plane response of infill walls subjected to shake table", Smart Struct. Syst., 21(4), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2018.21.4.521
  25. Onat, O., Correia, A.A., Lourenco, P.B. and Kocak, A. (2018), "Assessment of the combined in-plane and out-of-plane behavior of brick infill walls within reinforced concrete frames under seismic loading", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 47(14), 2821-2839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3111
  26. Onat, O., Lourenco, P.B. and Kocak, A. (2015), "Experimental and numerical analysis of RC structure with two leaf cavity wall subjected to shake table", Struct. Eng. Mech., 55(5), 1037-1053. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.5.1037
  27. Onat, O., Lourenco, P.B. and Kocak, A. (2016), "Nonlinear analysis of RC structure with massive infill wall exposed to shake table", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 811-828. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.811
  28. Onat, O., Lourenco, P.B. and Kocak, A. (2017), "Structural model calibration of RC structure with two-leaf cavity brick infill wall by deterministic approach", Gradevinar, 69(3), 171-181.
  29. Salameh, C., Guillier, B., Harb, J., Cornou, C., Bard, P.Y., Voisin, C. and Mariscal, A. (2016), "Seismic response of Beirut (Lebanon) buildings: instrumental results from ambient vibrations", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 14(10), 2705-2730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9920-9
  30. Sevim, B., Bayraktar, A. and Altunisik, A.C. (2011a), "Finite element model calibration of berke arch dam using operational modal testing", J. Vib. Control, 17(7), 1065-1079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546310377912
  31. Sevim, B., Bayraktar, A., Altunisik, A.C., Atamturktur, S. and Birinci, F. (2011b), "Assessment of nonlinear seismic performance of a restored historical arch bridge using ambient vibrations", Nonlin. Dyn., 63(4), 755-770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-010-9835-y
  32. Su, R.K.L., Lee, C.L. and Wang, Y.P. (2012), "Seismic spectral acceleration assessment of masonry in-filled reinforced concrete buildings by a coefficient-based method", Struct. Eng. Mech., 41(4), 479-494. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.41.4.479
  33. URL1:http://www.lnec.pt/estruturas/pt/nucleo/nucleo-deengenharia-sismica-e-dinamica-de-estruturas/apresentacao-1/
  34. Vidal, F., Navarro, M., Aranda, C. and Enomoto, T. (2014), "Changes in dynamic characteristics of Lorca RC buildings from pre-and post-earthquake ambient vibration data", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 12(5), 2095-2110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9489-5
  35. Yu, J., Zhang, Y. and Lu, Z. (2014), "Seismic rehabilitation of RC frame using epoxy injection technique tested on shaking table", Struct. Eng. Mech., 52(3), 541-558. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.3.541
  36. Zhang, X.C., Xue, J.Y., Zhao, H.T. and Sui, Y. (2011), "Experimental study on Chinese ancient timber-frame building by shaking table test", Struct. Eng. Mech., 40(4), 453-469. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.40.4.453