Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Amino acid digestibility in plant protein sources fed to growing pigs

  • Son, Ah Reum (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Park, Chan Sol (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Park, Kyu Ree (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University) ;
  • Kim, Beob Gyun (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Konkuk University)
  • Received : 2019.01.14
  • Accepted : 2019.02.16
  • Published : 2019.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to determine standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of amino acids (AA) in 11 plant protein sources fed to growing pigs. Methods: Eleven feed ingredients used were sesame meal, two sources of soybean meal (SBM) produced in the Republic of Korea, a source of SBM produced in India, high-protein distillers dried grains (HPDDG), perilla meal, canola meal, copra meal, corn germ meal, palm kernel expeller, and tapioca distillers dried grains (TDDG). Experimental diets were prepared to contain each test ingredient as a sole source of AA, and a nitrogen-free diet was also prepared to estimate the basal ileal endogenous losses of AA. Twelve barrows surgically fitted with T-cannulas at the distal ileum with an initial body weight of 29.0 kg (standard deviation = 3.0) were individually housed in metabolism crates equipped with a feeder and a nipple drinker. A $12{\times}9$ incomplete Latin square design was employed with 12 experimental diets, 12 animals, and 9 periods. After a 5-d adaptation period, ileal digesta were collected on d 6 and 7 in each experimental period. Results: Values for apparent ileal digestibility of most indispensable AA in three sources of SBM were greater compared with other test ingredients except HPDDG and canola meal (p<0.05). Pigs fed diets containing SBM sources had also greater SID of most indispensable AA compared with those fed diets containing other test ingredients (p<0.05) except for HPDDG and canola meal. There was no difference in the apparent ileal digestibility and SID of AA among sources of SBM. The TDDG had the least value for the SID of methionine among test ingredients (p<0.05). Conclusion: The SID of most AA in SBM, HPDDG, and canola meal were greater than those in sesame meal, perilla meal, copra meal, and TDDG.

Keywords

References

  1. Lewis AJ. Amino acids in swine nutrition. In: Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editors. Swine nutrition. Washington, DC, USA: CRC Press;2001. p. 131-50.
  2. Woyengo TA, Beltranena E, Zijlstra RT. Controlling feed cost by including alternative ingredients into pig diets: a review. J Anim Sci 2014;92:1293-305. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7169
  3. Messad F, Letourneau-Montminy MP, Charbonneau E, Sauvant D, Guay F. Meta-analysis of the amino acid digestibility of oilseed meal in growing pigs. Animal 2016;10:1635-44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116000732
  4. Kiarie E, Nyachoti CM. Alternative feed ingredients in swine diets. In: Saskatchewan Pork Industry Symposium; 2009 Nov 17-18; Saskatoon, Canada. p. 29-38.
  5. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2012.
  6. Son AR, Park CS, Kim BG. Determination and prediction of digestible and metabolizable energy concentrations in byproduct feed ingredients fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:546-53. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0607
  7. Lee SA, Kim BG. Classification of copra meal and copra expellers based on ether extract concentration and prediction of energy concentrations in copra byproducts. J Anim Plant Sci 2017;27:34-9.
  8. Stein HH, Shipley CF, Easter RA. Technical note: A technique for inserting a T-cannula into the distal ileum of pregnant sows. J Anim Sci 1998;76:1433-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7651433x
  9. Kim BG, Kim T. A program for making completely balanced Latin Square designs employing a systemic method. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2010;23:277-82.
  10. Horwitz W, Latimer Jr. GW. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2005.
  11. Son AR, Hyun Y, Htoo JK, Kim BG. Amino acid digestibility in copra expellers and palm kernel expellers by growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014;187:91-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.09.015
  12. Seo S, Jeon S, Ha JK. Guidelines for experimental design and statistical analyses in animal studies submitted for publication in the Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:1381-6. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0468
  13. Park CS, Oh SI, Kim BG. Prediction of basal endogenous losses of amino acids based on body weight and feed intake in pigs fed nitrogen-free diets. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu 2013;26:186-92.
  14. Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials: pigs, poultry, sheep, goats, rabbits, horses, and fish. 2nd ed. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2004.
  15. Aguilera A, de Souza TCR, Mariscal-Landin G, Escobar K, Montano S, Bernal MG. Standardized ileal digestibility of proteins and amino acids in sesame expeller and soya bean meal in weaning piglets. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2015;99:728-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12278
  16. Casas GA, Jaworski NW, Htoo JK, Stein HH. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in selected feed ingredients fed to young growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2018;96:2361-70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky114
  17. Adebiyi AO, Ragland D, Adeola O, Olukosi OA. Apparent or standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids of diets containing different protein feedstuffs fed at two crude protein levels for growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:1327-34. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0914
  18. Upadhaya SD, Kim IH. Ileal digestibility of nutrients and amino acids in unfermented, fermented soybean meal and canola meal for weaning pigs. Anim Sci J 2015;86:408-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12305
  19. Lee SA, Park CS, Nam DS, Kim BG. Prediction models for amino acid concentrations in soybean meal. In: Proceedings of 2016 Annual Congress of KSAST; 2016 June 23-24; Seoul, Korea: Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology;2016. 63 p.
  20. Dilger RN, Sands JS, Ragland D, Adeola O. Digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids in soybean meal with added soyhulls. J Anim Sci 2004;82:715-24. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.823715x
  21. Wang HL, Shi M, Xu X, Ma XK, Liu L, Piao XS. Comparative energy content and amino acid digestibility of barley obtained from diverse sources fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:999-1005. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0775
  22. Park CS, Helmbrecht A, Htoo JK, Adeola O. Comparison of amino acid digestibility in full-fat soybean, two soybean meals, and peanut flour between broiler chickens and growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2017;95:3110-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2017.1404
  23. Kim BG, Petersen GI, Hinson RB, Allee GL, Stein HH. Amino acid digestibility and energy concentration in a novel source of high-protein distillers dried grains and their effects on growth performance of pigs. J Anim Sci 2009;87:4013-21. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2060
  24. Adeola O, Ragland D. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in coproducts of corn processing into ethanol for pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90(Suppl 4):86-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.51661
  25. Xue PC, Dong B, Zang JJ, Zhu ZP, Gong LM. Energy and standardized ileal amino acid digestibilities of chinese distillers dried grains, produced from different regions and grains fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2012;25:104-13. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11052
  26. Liu Y, Song M, Maison T, Stein HH. Effects of protein concentration and heat treatment on concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy and on amino acid digestibility in four sources of canola meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2014;92:4466-77. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2013-7433
  27. Maison T, Stein HH. Digestibility by growing pigs of amino acids in canola meal from North America and 00-rapeseed meal and 00-rapeseed expellers from Europe. J Anim Sci 2014;92:3502-14. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7748
  28. Adewole DI, Rogiewicz A, Dyck B, Slominski BA. Chemical and nutritive characteristics of canola meal from Canadian processing facilities. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;222:17-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.09.012
  29. Moon HK, Kim JW, Heo KN, et al. Growth performance and amino acid digestibilities affected by various plant protein sources in growing-finishing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 1994;7:537-46. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1994.537
  30. Almeida FN, Petersen GI, Stein HH. Digestibility of amino acids in corn, corn coproducts, and bakery meal fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2011;89:4109-15. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4143
  31. Stein HH, Casas GA, Abelilla JJ, Liu Y, Sulabo RC. Nutritional value of high fiber co-products from the copra, palm kernel, and rice industries in diets fed to pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2015;6:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0056-6
  32. Kim BG, Kil DY, Zhang Y, Stein HH. Concentrations of analyzed or reactive lysine, but not crude protein, may predict the concentration of digestible lysine in distillers dried grains with solubles fed to pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:3798-808. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4692
  33. Cotten B, Ragland D, Thomson JE, Adeola O. Amino acid digestibility of plant protein feed ingredients for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2016;94:1073-82. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9662

Cited by

  1. Effect of Dietary Supplement, Base Mix, and/or Soybean Meal on Growing Pig Performance vol.10, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2020.103034
  2. Supplemental protease improves in vitro disappearance of dry matter and crude protein in feather meal and copra meal for pigs vol.49, 2019, https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920200095
  3. 자돈에서 대체 단백질 원료사료의 외관상 회장 아미노산 소화율 및 표준 회장 아미노산 소화율 평가 vol.21, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2020.21.6.358
  4. A new source of high-protein distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) has greater digestibility of amino acids and energy, but less digestibility of phosphorus, than de-oiled DDGS when fed to grow vol.98, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa200
  5. Comprehensive overview of the quality of plant‐ And animal‐sourced proteins based on the digestible indispensable amino acid score vol.8, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1809
  6. Protein and energy concentrations of meat meal and meat and bone meal fed to pigs based on in vitro assays vol.7, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.07.007
  7. Novel Two-Slope Equations to Predict Amino Acid Concentrations Using Crude Protein Concentration in Soybean Meal vol.11, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040280
  8. Effects of supplemental xylanase on in vitro disappearance of dry matter in feed ingredients for swine vol.34, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v34n4a08
  9. Amino acid digestibility in diets containing copra meal with β-mannanase fed to growing pigs vol.34, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0019