DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Novel Engineering and Creative Learning Process Based on Constructionism

  • Received : 2019.07.08
  • Accepted : 2019.08.22
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

This paper shows that novel engineering (NE) is a creative learning process (CLP) based on Seymour Papert's constructionism. First, the paper introduces NE, CLP, and constructionism. Next, a sample NE lesson is explored. NE is an innovative way of integrating literacy into an engineering discipline that was developed by the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) at Tufts University. NE consists of seven steps: picking a book, identifying problems, designing solutions, building, feedback, upgrading solutions, and reconstructing stories. Lifelong Kindergarten by Mitchel Resnick of the MIT Media Lab describes CLP, and the four elements necessary for a lesson to be creative. NE can be viewed as one of the most creative, comprehensive learning models ever developed. NE integrates several paradigms in Korea, following all the constructs of both CLP and constructionism. The aim of this paper is to show that NE is based on both CLP and constructionism.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education, 2015 Revised Curriculum, South Korea, 2015.
  2. M. Resnick, Lifelong Kindergarten, MIT Press, MIT, 2018.
  3. S. Mulderij, "The Conditions for Invention," Bachelor Thesis, Utrecht University, 2016.
  4. K.C. Hong and J.K. Shim, "A study of STEAM education for elementary science subject with robots," Journal of Korean Association of Information Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 83-91, 2013.
  5. K.C. Hong, "An introduction of robotics education in Tufts University," Journal of Korean Association of Information Education, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 171-178, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.20.2.171
  6. K.M. Park and S.Y. Seo, "Effects of reading-guidance program on self-esteem and interpersonal cognitive problem solving of children," The Journal of Elementary Education Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 39-57, 2007.
  7. McCormick. M, "Complex dynamics of student engagement in Novel Engineering design activities," Ph.D. dissertation, Tufts University: MA, 2015.
  8. A. Johnson, K. Wendell, and J. Watkins, "Examining experienced teachers' noticing and responses to students' engineering," Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25-35, 2017. DOI: 10.7771/2157-9288.1162.
  9. L.A. Yang, A.W. Johnson, and M.D. Portsmore, "Eliciting informed designer patterns from elementary students with openEnded problems," in Proceeding of the 122nd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle: WA, USA, pp. 26.593.1-26.593.13, 2015. DOI: 10.18260/p.23931.
  10. Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO). Available: http://www.novelengineering.org
  11. K.C. Hong, "A case study of novel engineering in elementary school," in Proceeding of the 2018 International Conference on Future Information and Communication, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 34-36, June 2018.
  12. S.H. Ahn, "The effect of computer literacy on learner's cognitive aspects learning ability," Journal of Korean Association of Information Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 169-177, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.2.169

Cited by

  1. Development and Application of a Novel Engineering-Based Maker Education Course for Pre-Service Teachers vol.10, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10050126
  2. 노벨 엔지니어링이 창의적 문제해결력 향상에 미치는 효과 vol.18, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22678/jic.2020.18.3.083
  3. 프로젝트법을 활용하는 프로그래밍분야 직업능력개발훈련교사의 직업정체성 내러티브 연구 vol.24, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2020.24.10.1348
  4. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Learning Engagement and Teaching Presence in Online Programming Classes vol.18, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.6109/jicce.2020.18.4.239
  5. 프로그래밍 직업능력개발훈련교사의 직업정체성 형성 과정에 대한 연구 vol.25, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2021.25.2.294