DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Composition and Abundance of Wood-Boring Beetles Inhabited by Pine Trees

  • Park, Yonghwan (Division of Forest Biodiversity, Korea National Arboretum) ;
  • Jang, Taewoong (College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Won, Daesung (College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Jongkuk (College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2019.05.17
  • Accepted : 2019.07.19
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

Plants are consumed by a myriad of organisms that compete for resources. Direct interactions among multiple plant-feeding organisms in a single host can range for each species from positive to negative. Wood-boring beetle faces a number of biotic and abiotic constraints that interfere with the good prospects from the tree. Biotic factors, including arthropod pests and diseases, and abiotic factors, such as drought and water-logging, are the major constraints affecting the species. The present study aimed to provide basic data for analyzing forest health, identify the kinds of wood-boring beetles in the central part of Korea. Our second goal was to analyze the species composition and diversity of regional communities and to examine. A total of 10,461 individual wood-boring beetles belonging to 8 families and 50 species attracted to trap trees in the pine forests were recorded during the study period on study sites. The results of the analysis of collected species showed that the community structure on all study sites was similar. Seasonal occurrences of dominant wood-boring beetles (5 species) from each study site showed the highest number of all species, except for Siphalinus gigas in May, followed by a gradual decline, and the largest number of Siphalinus gigas appeared in June. The similarity index of species composition was relatively high, ranging from 0.75 to 0.90 for each study site.

Keywords

References

  1. Bamin Y, Gajurel PR, Paul A. 2017. Community structure, species composition and population status of NTFPs of Ziro valley in Arunachal Pradesh, India. J For Environ Sci 33: 202-225.
  2. Brower JE, Zar JH. 1984. Community similarity. In: Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology (Brower JE, Zar JH, eds). Win C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, pp 161-164.
  3. Findlay WPK. 1985. Preservation of timber in the tropics. Martinus Nijhoff/W, Dordrecht, 273 pp.
  4. Hakeem KR, Chandna R, Ahmad P, Iqbal M, Ozturk M. 2012. Relevance of proteomic investigations in plant abiotic stress physiology. OMICS 16: 621-635. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2012.0041
  5. Hayashi M, Morimoto K, Kimoto S. 1984. The Coleoptera of Japan in Color. vol. IV. Hoikusha Publ, Osaka.
  6. Hosen MS, Ahamed MS. 2017. Pattern of species distribution along environmental variables in two different forest beat of Raghunandan Reserve Forest of Habiganj. J For Environ Sci 33: 257-269.
  7. Karban R, Grof-Tisza P, Holyoak M. 2012. Facilitation of tiger moths by outbreaking tussock moths that share the same host plants. J Anim Ecol 81: 1095-1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01993.x
  8. Kim YH, Han KS. 1985. Study on the control of pine bark beetle (Myelophilus piniperda linne) by repellent. Theses Collect Agric Coll 17: 91-93.
  9. Kim YH. 1975. Studies on the Control of the Pine Bark Beetle (Myelophilus pinipedera LINNE) (I): analysis of the carotenoids in important pine species in Korea. J Korean For Soc 27: 15-21.
  10. Koh DS, Wi H, Kim YH. 1980. Studies on the Control of the Pine Bark Beetle (Myelophilus pinipedera Linne) (III). Theses Collect Agric Coll 11: 44-47.
  11. Korea Forest Research Institute. 1997. Second year report on ecological study on forest-fired area in Goseong. Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul.
  12. Kwon T, Park Y, Kwon Y, Song M, Shin S, Park J. 2003. Effects of aerial pesticide application on arthropod communities in pine forests. J Korean For Soc 92: 608-617.
  13. Kwon TS, Park JK. 2005. Comparative study on beetle fauna between burned and unburned forest. J Korean For Soc 94: 226-235.
  14. Lawrence JF, Beutel RG, Leschen RAB, Slipinski A. 2010. Glossary of morphological terms. In: Handbook of zoology. vol. 2, Coleoptera: morphology and systematics, elateroidea, bostrichiformia, cucujifornia partim (Lawrence JF, Beutel RG, Leschen RAB, Slipinski A, eds). De Gruyter, Berlin, pp 9-20.
  15. Lee BY, Jung YJ. 1997. Korean tree pest. Sungandang, Seoul, 459 pp.
  16. Pausas JG. 1994. Species richness patterns in the understorey of Pyrenean Pinus sylvestris forest. J Veg Sci 5: 517-524. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235978
  17. Sarker SK, Sonet SS, Haque MM, Sharmin M. 2013. Disentangling the role of soil in structuring tropical tree communities at Tarap Hill Reserve of Bangladesh. Ecol Res 28: 553-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-013-1045-x
  18. Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1998. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  19. Sorensen TJ. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Munksgaard, Kobenhavn, pp 1-34.
  20. Stout MJ, Thaler JS, Thomma BP. 2006. Plant-mediated interactions between pathogenic microorganisms and herbivorous arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 51: 663-689. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151117
  21. Tack AJ, Dicke M. 2013. Plant pathogens structure arthropod communities across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Funct Ecol 27: 633-645. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12087
  22. Wargo PM. 1996. Consequences of environmental stress on oak: predisposition to pathogens. Ann For Sci 53: 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19960218