Management & Information Systems Review (경영과정보연구)

Daehan Academy of Management Information Systems (대한경영정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Job Crafting on Organization Effectiveness - Mediating Role of Proactive Behavior -

잡 크래프팅(Job Crafting)이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향 -주도적 행동의 매개효과-

  • Choi, Su-Heyong (Dept. of Business Administration, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Mi (Dept. of Business Administration, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2019.01.22
  • Accepted : 2019.05.28
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the mediating role of proactive behaviors in the mechanism which job crafting affects organizational effectiveness. Through this study, we tried to contribute to the following theoretical and practical aspects. First, we tried to extend the theoretical discussion by identifying the relationship between job crafting, proactive behavior, and organizational effectiveness. Second, we provide practical implications for Korean organizational members based on proven job crafting, proactive behavior, and organizational effectiveness, and contribute to creating a work environment that enhances job satisfaction and reduces turnover intention. The results of this study are as follows. First, increasing structural job resource, increasing social job resource and increasing challenging job demand, which are sub-factors of job crafting, had a positive effect on job satisfaction. Second, increasing structural job resource, increasing social job resource and increasing challenging job demand, which are sub-factors of job crafting, had a negative effect on turnover intention. Third, job crafting had a positive effect on proactive behavior. Fourth, proactive behavior mediated the relationship of increasing structural job resource, increasing social job resource, increasing challenging job demand, and job satisfaction. Fifth, proactive behavior mediated the relationship of increasing structural job resource, increasing social job resource and turnover intention. This study provides an understanding of the impact of job crafting on organizational effectiveness and is expected to contribute to future research on job crafting.

본 연구는 잡 크래프팅이 조직유효성에 영향을 미치는 메커니즘에서 주도적 행동의 매개역할을 고찰하는데 연구의 목적이 있다. 본 연구를 통해서 다음과 같은 이론적 및 실천적 측면에 기여하고자 하였다. 첫째, 잡 크래프팅, 주도적 행동, 조직유효성 간의 새로운 발현 기제를 증명하여 이를 통해 이론적 논의를 확장하고자 하였다. 둘째, 실증된 잡 크래프팅, 주도적 행동, 조직유효성 간 발현 기제를 토대로 국내 조직 구성원에게 적용될 수 있는 실천적 시사점을 제공하여 조직 구성원의 직무만족을 더 높이고 이직의도를 줄이는 일터 환경을 조성하는데 기여하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서 독립변수인 잡 크래프팅 행동을 구조적 직무자원 증가, 사회적 직무자원 증가, 도전적 직무요구 증가, 방해적 직무요구 감소의 네 가지 유형으로 분류하였으며 실증분석 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 잡 크래프팅의 하위요소인 구조적 직무자원 증가, 사회적 직무자원 증가 및 도전적 직무요구 증가는 직무만족에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 구조적 직무자원 증가, 사회적 직무자원 증가 및 도전적 직무요구 증가는 이직의도에 부(-)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 잡 크래프팅은 주도적 행동에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 주도적 행동은 잡 크래프팅의 하위요소인 구조적 직무자원 증가, 사회적 직무자원 증가 및 도전적 직무요구 증가와 직무만족 간의 관계에서 매개역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 다섯째, 주도적 행동은 구조적 직무자원 증가 및 사회적 직무자원 증가와 이직의도 간의 관계에서 매개역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 잡 크래프팅이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 대한 이해를 제공하고 있으며 향후 잡 크래프팅에 관한 연구에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것으로 예상된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김도형, 서균석, & 김태형(2010), 학습동기, 경력계획 및 조직지원이 경력정체와 이직의도 간 관계에 미치는 조절효과. 대한경영학회 학술발표대회 발표논문집, 117-138.
  2. 박내회(2004), 조직행동론, 서울: 박영사.
  3. 신유근(1992), 한국기업의 경영조직.경영전략. 인사관리에 대한 현상분석, 노사관계연구, 서울대학교 경영대학 노사관계 연구소, 251-322.
  4. 이성화, 고성훈, & 문태원(2016), 조직구성원에게 인식된 조직의 미덕이 직무성과와 잡 크래프팅에 미치는 영향-긍정심리자본의 매개효과를 중심으로. 경영과 정보연구, 35(5), 81-108.
  5. 이용탁(2017), ICT 기업의 조직문화가 조직구성원 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 경영과 정보연구, 36(4), 149-166.
  6. 이정원(2017), "진정성 리더십이 조직구성원의 잡 크래프팅, 애착, 고객지향성에 미치는 영향," 세종대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  7. 임명기, 하유진, 오동준, 손영우(2014), "한국판 잡 크래프팅 척도(JCQ-K)의 타당화 연구," 기업경영연구, 56, 181-206.
  8. 임태근, & 최우성(2016). 직업가치가 이직의도에 미치는 영향에 있어 조직후원인식의 조절 효과-외식업체 1 년 미만 신입종사원을 중심으로. 경영과 정보연구, 35(3), 37-56.
  9. 허원무(2013). 매개효과 분석 방법의 최근 트렌드. 한국비즈니스리뷰, 6(3), 43-59.
  10. Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied psychology, 81(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.199
  11. Baer, Markus, & Frese, Michael (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.179
  12. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007), The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
  13. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., De Boer, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003), Job demands and job resources as predictors of absence duration and frequency. Journal of vocational behavior, 62(2), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00030-1
  14. Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007), Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of educational psychology, 99(2), 274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274
  15. Black, J. S. & Ashford, S. J. (1995), "Fitting in or making jobs fit : Factors affecting mode of adjustment for new hires," Human Relations, 48(4), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679504800407
  16. Chung-Yan, G. A., & Butler, A. M. (2011), Proactive personality in the context of job complexity, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 43(4), 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024501
  17. Crant, J. M. (2000), Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304
  18. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., and W. B. Schaufeli(2001), "The job demands-resources model of burnout." Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
  19. Diener, E., Larsen, R. J., & Emmons, R. A. (1984), Person ${\times}$ situation interactions: Choice of situations and congruence response models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(3), 580-592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.3.580
  20. Fisher, C. D. (2000), "Mood and Emotions While Working: Missing Pieces of Job Satisfaction?," Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2<185::AID-JOB34>3.0.CO;2-M
  21. Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001), 4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in organizational behavior, 23, 133-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6
  22. Fried, Y., Grant, A. M., Levi, A. S., Hadani, M., & Slowik, L. H. (2007), Job design in temporal context: A career dynamics perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 911-927. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.486
  23. Ghitulescu, B. E. (2006), Shaping task and relationship at work: Examining the antecedents and consequences of employee job crafting, Dotoral Dissertation University of Pittsburgh. Ph. D.
  24. Ghitulescu, B. E. (2013), Making change happen: The impact of work context on adaptive and proactive behaviors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(2), 206-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886312469254
  25. Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008), The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28(1), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
  26. Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives, The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317-375. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520903047327
  27. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
  28. Griffin, M., Parker, S., & Mason, C. (2010). Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017263
  29. Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York : Guilford.
  30. Kim, G., Lee, Y. (2016), Toward high performance organization: The impacts of job characteristics and job crafting. International Journal of u- and e-Service, Science and Technology, 9(2), 85-100.
  31. Kulik, C. T., Oldham, G. R., & Hackman, J. R. (1987), "Work design as an approach to person-environment fit," Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 278-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90044-3
  32. Leana, C., Appelbaum, E., & Shevchuk, I. (2009). Work process and quality of care in early childhood education: The role of job crafting. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1169-1192. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.47084651
  33. Lyons, P. (2008). The crafting of jobs and individual differences. Journal of Business and Psychology, 23(1/2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-008-9080-2
  34. Mobley, W. H. (1977). Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.2.237
  35. Parker, S. K., & C. G. Collins. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
  36. Parker, S. K., Williams, H., M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
  37. Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2018), Crafting the change: The role of employee job crafting behaviors for successful organizational change. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1766-1792. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315624961
  38. Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A. & LePine, M. A. (2007), Differential challenge stressorhindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover and withdrawal behavior: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438-454. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438
  39. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  40. Price, J. L. (1968), Organizational effectiveness, Irwin, Homewood, IL.
  41. Schein, E. H. (1980), Organizational psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  42. Schermerhorn, J. R. (1997), Organizational Behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  43. Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010), Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1-9.
  44. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009
  45. Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230-240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141
  46. Vandenerg, R. J., Nelson, J. B. (1999), Disaggregative the motives underlying turnover intention: when do intentions predict turnover behavior? Human Relations, 52(10): 1313-1336 https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905201005
  47. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001), Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378011

Cited by

  1. 잡 크래프팅에 관한 통합적 문헌 고찰: 국내 양적연구를 중심으로 vol.19, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2019.19.11.234