Korean Journal of Microbiology (미생물학회지)

The Microbiological Society of Korea (한국미생물학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Complete genome sequence of Enterococcus faecalis strain DM01, a potential starter culture candidate for soybean fermentation

콩발효 종균후보 Enterococcus faecalis strain DM01의 유전체 염기서열

  • Heo, Sojeong (Department of Food and Nutrition, Dongduk Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Hoon (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Jeong, Do-Won (Department of Food and Nutrition, Dongduk Women's University)
  • 허소정 (동덕여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이종훈 (경기대학교 식품생물공학과) ;
  • 정도원 (동덕여자대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Received : 2019.08.06
  • Accepted : 2019.09.03
  • Published : 2019.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Enterococcus faecalis strain DM01 was isolated from meju, a traditional Korean fermented soybean product. The strain did not exhibit resistance to eight antibiotics (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, penicillin G, tetracycline, and vancomycin), biofilm formation, and hemolytic activity. The genome of strain DM01 consists a single circular 2,785,968-bp chromosome with a G + C content of 37.68%. The complete genomic sequence of strain DM01 provides genetic information to support the absence of antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, and hemolytic activity.

메주로부터 분리한 Enterococcus faecalis DM01 균주는 8종의 항생제(ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, penicillin G, tetracycline, vancomycin) 저항성, 바이오필름 및 용혈현상을 나타내지 않았다. GC 함량 37.68%, 2,785,968 bp 크기의 단일 chromosome을 보유하고 있는 DM01 균주의 유전체 정보는 콩발효식품 제조용 종균 적용에 요구되는 항생물질 저항성, 바이오필름 및 용혈현상 관련의 안전성을 뒷받침하는 것으로 확인되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. EFSA. 2004. EFSA scientific colloquium. Summary report. QPS. Qualified presumption of safety of microorganism in food and feed. Brussels, Belgium.
  2. Foulquie Moreno MR, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, and De Vuyst L. 2006. The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 106, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.06.026
  3. Franz CM, Huch M, Abriouel H, Holzapfel W, and Galvez A. 2011. Enterococci as probiotics and their implications in food safety. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 151, 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.08.014
  4. Jeong DW, Heo S, Ryu S, Blom J, and Lee JH. 2017. Genomic insights into the virulence and salt tolerance of Staphylococcus equorum. Sci. Rep. 7, 5383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05918-5
  5. Jeong DW, Kim HR, Jung G, Han S, Kim CT, and Lee JH. 2014. Bacterial community migration in the ripening of doenjang, a traditional Korean fermented soybean food. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 648-660. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1401.01009
  6. Park J, Jin GD, Pak JI, Won J, and Kim EB. 2017. Development of a rapid identification method for the differentiation of Enterococcus species using a species-specific multiplex PCR based on comparative genomics. Curr. Microbiol. 74, 476-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-017-1210-5
  7. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, and Lipman DJ. 1997. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278, 631-637. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5338.631
  8. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, and Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 6614-6624. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw569
  9. Yamaguchi T, Miura Y, and Matsumoto T. 2013. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus strains used in clinical practice as probiotics. J. Infect. Chemother. 19, 1109-1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-013-0633-6