Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of seeding dates on dry matter yield and feed values of whole-crop barley cultivated in a paddy field

  • Lee, Sang Moo (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Joong (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2019.07.15
  • Accepted : 2019.09.02
  • Published : 2019.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the effects of seeding dates on the yield and feed value of whole-crop barley cultivated in paddy soil. The field experiment was conceived as a randomized block design performed in triplicate with seeding dates of Oct. 19 (T1 as treatment 1), Oct. 26 (T2 as treatment 2), Nov. 2 (T3 as treatment 3), Nov. 9 (T4 as treatment 4), and Nov. 16 (T5 as treatment 5) as treatments. The barley grown in all treatments was harvested on May 21 of the following year. Plant length, fresh yield, dry matter yield, and total digestible nutrient (TDN) yield were higher (p < 0.05) in barley with early seeding dates, whereas crude protein and ether extract were higher (p < 0.05) with late seeding dates. Crude fiber and neutral detergent fiber were highest in the T3 treatment and lowest in the T1 treatment. There was no significant difference between acid detergent fiber and TDN among the different seeding dates. Total mineral contents were higher in the order T1 > T2 > T3 > T4 > T5 (p < 0.05), whereas the total amino acid content increased significantly (p < 0.05) with a delay in seeding date. Free sugar contents (fructose, glucose, and sucrose) were higher with early seeding dates (p < 0.05). Collectively, the results obtained in this study indicate that it is favorable to seed soon after harvesting rice to increase dry matter and TDN yields and mineral and free sugar contents of whole-crop barley in the midlands of Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee SM, Kim EJ. Study on nutritive values of whole crop barley varieties grown in a paddy field. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2013;33:30-8. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.1.30
  2. Kim MJ, Choi KJ, Kim JG, Seo S, Yoon SH, Lim YC, et al. Effect of varieties and seeding date on over winter and dry matter yield of Italian ryegrass in paddy field. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2009;29:321-8. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.4.321
  3. Park TI, Han OK, Seo JH, Choi JS, Park KH, Kim JG. New barley cultivars with improved morphological characteristics for whole crop forage in Korea. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2008;28:193-202. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.3.193
  4. Yun SK, Park TI, Seo JH, Kim KH, Song TH, Park KH, et al. Effect of harvest time and cultivars on forage yield and quality of whole crop barley. J Korean Grassl Forage Sci. 2009;29:121-8. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.2.121
  5. Choi SH, Hwangbo S, Kim SW, Kim WH, Jo IH. Effects of feeding level of concentrate on the digestible nutrient intake, using efficiency of nutrients and nitrogen retention of Korean black goat fed whole crop barley silage. J Korean Grassl Forage Sci. 2010;30:59-66. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.1.059
  6. Seo S, Kim WH, Kim JG, Choi GJ, Kim KY, Cho WM, et al. Effect of whole crop barley silage feeding on the growth performance, feed requirement and meat quality of Hanwoo steers. J Korean Grassl Forage Sci. 2010;30:257-66. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.3.257
  7. Kim HY, Chu GM, Kim SC, Ha JH, Kim JH, Lee SD, et al. The nutritive value of grains from barley cultivars (Wooho, Youngyang, Yuyeon). J Agric Life Sci. 2012;46:69-78.
  8. Kim WH, Seo S, Chung ES, Shin DE, Park TI, Koh JM, et al. Selection of promising barley cultivar for silage. 1. Growth characteristics and fresh matter yield. J Korean Grassl Sci. 2002;22:201-8. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2002.22.3.201
  9. Kim WH, Seo S, Yoon SH, Kim KY, Cho YM, Park TI, et al. Selection of promising barley cultivar for silage 2. Nutrient value and total digestible nutrient yield. J Korean Grassl Sci. 2003;23:283-8. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2003.23.4.283
  10. Kim WH, Seo S, Lim YC, Shine JS, Sung BR, Ji HC, et al. Selection of promising barley cultivar for silage at paddy field of Honam region. J Korean Grassl Forage Sci. 2007;27:161-6. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.3.161
  11. Song TH, Han OK, Yun SK, Park TI, Seo JH, Kim KH, et al. Changes in quantity and quality of winter cereal crops for forage at different growing stages. J Korean Grassl Forage Sci. 2009;29:129-36. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.2.129
  12. Kim WH, Seo S, Shin JS, Lim YC, Kim KY, Jung MW, et al. Effect of seeding date and rate on the agronomic characteristics and yield of forage barley. J Korean Grassl Sci. 2006;26:155-8. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.3.155
  13. Choi JS, Kim JG, Baek SB, Park KH, Kwon YU, Park HH, et al. A ruminant-palatable hood type barley cultivar "Yuyeon" or whole-crop-forage use. Korean J Breed Sci. 2007;39:242-3.
  14. Lee SM. Effects of seeding dates on yield and feed value of Italian ryegrass in paddy field cultivation. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2013;33:185-92. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.3.185
  15. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Analytical Chemist; 1995.
  16. AOAC. Official methods of analysis Proximate analysis and calculations acid detergent fiber (ADF) - item 1. Reference data: Method 973.18 (A-D). 17th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Association of Analytical Communities; 2006.
  17. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Forage fiber analysis, agriculture handbook no. 379. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1970.
  18. Moore JE, Undersander DJ. Relative forage quality: An alternative to relative feed value and quality index. In: Proceedings 13th Annual Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium; 2002; Gainesville, FL. p.16-32.
  19. Wilson AM, Work TM, Bushway AA, Bushway RJ. HPLC determination of fructose, glucose, and sucrose in potatoes. J Food Sci. 1981;46:300-1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb14589.x
  20. SAS Institute Inc. What's new in SAS$^{(R)}$ 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2012.
  21. Suh HS. Comparison of several agronomic characteristics as affected by seeding dates. Korean J Crop Sci. 1981;26:298-303.
  22. Kim MJ, Choi GJ, Yook WB, Lim YC, Yoon SH, Kim JG, et al. Effects of seeding method on the winter survival, dry matter yield and nutrient value of Italian ryegrass in paddy field. J Korean Grassl Forage Sci. 2007;27:269-74. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2007.27.4.269
  23. Hwang KJ, Ko SB, Park HS, Park NG, Ko MS, Jeong HY, et al. Effects of the cutting time on forage yield and quality in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) and oat (Avena sativa L.) seeded singly or in combination. J Korean Grassl Forage Sci. 2008;28:295-300. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.4.295
  24. Seo S, Kim MJ, Kim WH, Lee SH, Jung MW, Kim KY, et al. Optimum harvest stage of Italian ryegrass 'Kowinearly' according to one and two harvests during spring season. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2013;33:15-20. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.1.15
  25. Lee SM. Effects of mixed application of chemical fertilizer and liquid swine manure on agronomic characteristics, yield and feed value of corn hybrid for silage in paddy field cultivation. J Korean Soc Grassl Forage Sci. 2012;32:369-78. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.4.369
  26. Reid RL, Post AJ, Jung GA. Mineral composition of forages. Bull W Va Agric Exp Stn. 1970;589T.
  27. Kim MC. Effects of nitrogen and potassium application on pasture of Cheju volcanic soil. I. Dry matter yield and mineral concentration (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Na) of orchardgrass. Korean J Anim Sci. 1991;33:683-91.
  28. Lee SM, Lee JH. Effects of seeding dates and growth periods on the growth characteristics, dry matter yield and feed value of corn for silage in paddy field. J Anim Sci Tech. 2010;52:441-8. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2010.52.5.441
  29. Harnly JM, Wolf WR. Atomic spectrometry for inorganic elements in foods. In: Charalambous G, editor. Analysis of foods and beverages: modern techniques. London: Academic Press; 1984. p.452-81.
  30. Kim WS, Hwang JH, Lee JH, Kim EJ, Jeon BT, Moon SH, et al. A comparative study on the growth characteristics and nutritional components of corn hybrids for silage at paddy field cultivation. J Korean Grassl Forage Sci. 2012;32:15-28. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.1.15
  31. Jeon BT, Moon SH, Lee SM. A comparative studies on the growth characteristics and feed components of sorghum ${\times}$ sudangrass hybrids at paddy field cultivation. J Korean Grassl Forage Sci. 2012;32:29-38. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.1.29
  32. Chatterton NJ, Watts KA, Jensen KB, Harrison PA, Horton WH. Nonstructural carbohydrates in oat forage. J Nutr. 2006;136 Suppl 7:2111S-3S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.7.2111S
  33. Davies DR, Merry RJ, Williams AP, Bakewell EL, Leemans DK, Tweed JK. Proteolysis during ensilage of forages varying in soluble sugar content. J Dairy Sci. 1998;81:444-53. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75596-1