디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권9호
  • /
  • Pages.349-359
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 메이커 운동(Maker Movement)의 현황 및 활성화 방안 연구: 메이커 커뮤니티 참여 효과 중심으로

The Current State and Activating Strategies of Korea's Maker Movement : Focusing on the Effect of Maker Community Participation

  • 이진석 (동국대학교 경영학) ;
  • 전승우 (동국대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 권지은 (상명대학교 휴먼지능정보공학과)
  • Lee, Jin-Suk (Department of Business Administration, Dongguk University) ;
  • Chun, Seung-Woo (Department of Business Administration, Dongguk University) ;
  • Kwon, Ji-Eun (Department of Intelligent Engineering Informatics for Human, Sangmyung University)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.10
  • 심사 : 2019.09.20
  • 발행 : 2019.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국내 메이커 운동의 현황을 파악하고 메이커 커뮤니티 참여를 중심으로 메이커 운동의 활성화 방안을 모색하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 한국과학창의재단에서 10대부터 50대 사이의 일반인 대상으로 실시한 '2018 하반기 국내 메이커 운동 실태조사' 자료를 분석하였다. 분석결과, 첫째, 국내에서 메이커 운동에 관한 인지도와 메이커 관심 및 참여 의도는 아직까지 높지 않았다. 둘째, 메이커 커뮤니티 참여자와 비참여자 사이에 메이커 인지도 및 메이커 활동에 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 메이커 커뮤니티 참여와 메이커 오리엔테이션 사이의 긍정적인 관계에서 메이커 활동 동기들(즐거움, 스트레스 해소, 자신의 아이디어 표현, 비용 절감, 사회적 인정)의 다중병렬매개효과를 확인하였다. 마지막으로, 연구 결과를 바탕으로 메이커 커뮤니티 참여를 활용한 국내 메이커 운동의 활성화 방안을 제안하였다.

This study investigated the current state of Korean Maker Movement and explored the ways for activating Maker Movement in Korea. To do this purpose, we analyzed the data of 'A survey of the Korea Maker Movement in the second half of 2018', conducted by Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity involved 20's~50's Koreans. As a results, first, awareness, interest and behavior intention of Maker Movement was not high in Korea. Second, there were significant different between participants and non-participants of Maker Community in Maker awareness and Maker activities. Third, the positive relation between Maker Community participation and Maker Orientation is parallel multiple mediated by Maker activating motives such as fun, relieving stress, expressing own idea, saving cost, social recognition. Lastly, based upon the results, we presented several ways to activate Maker Movement in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. Schon, M. Ebner & S. Kumar. (2014). The Maker Movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching. eLearning papers, 39, 14-25.
  2. J. Hagel, J. S. Brown & D. Kulasooriya. (2013). A movement in the making. Deloitte.
  3. H. W. Shin & K. S. Lee. (2017). A Critical Review for Koreas Maker Culture Trends : Between National Development Discourse of Maker and Possibilities in The Everyday Culture. Humanities Contents, 45(45), 207-231. DOI : 10.18658/humancon.2017.06.45.207
  4. M. Hatch. (2014). The maker movement manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
  5. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity, A survey of the Korea Maker Movement in first half of 2018, 2018. 03.
  6. S. Kwak, Y. Baek & J. Kwon. (2019). Service Design Guideline for Maker Space. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(2), 389-397. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2019.17.2.389
  7. L. Martin. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4. DOI : 10.7771/2157-9288.1099
  8. D. Dougherty. (2016). Free to make: How the maker movement is changing our schools, our jobs, and our minds. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
  9. R. E. Browder, H. E. Aldrich & S. W. Bradley. (2019). The emergence of the maker movement: Implications for entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(3), 459-476. DOI : 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.005
  10. C. Anderson. (2012). Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Crown Business.
  11. R. Kanfer & F. H. Kanfer. (1991). Goals self-regulation: Applications or theory to work settings'. ML Maehr and PR Pintrich (edn), Advances in Motivation and Achievement vol, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 287-326.
  12. M. G. Seo, L. F. Barrett & J. M. Bartunek. (2004). The role of affective experience in work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 423-439. DOI : 10.5465/amr.2004.13670972
  13. P. J. Teixeira, A. L. Palmeira & M. Vansteenkiste. (2012). The role of self-determination theory and motivational interviewing in behavioral nutrition, physical activity, and health: an introduction to the IJBNPA special series. International Journal of Behavioral nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 17. DOI : 10.1186/1479-5868-9-17.
  14. D. Lee & S. Lee. (1999). Consumer Behavior. Seoul. Young-Poong Press.
  15. K. S. Courneya & L. A. M. Hellsten. (1998). Personality correlates of exercise behavior, motives, barriers and preferences: An application of the five-factor model. Personality and Individual differences, 24(5), 625-633. DOI : 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00231-6
  16. B. R. Kwon & J. Lee. (2017). What makes a maker: the motivation for the maker movement in ICT. Information Technology for Development, 23(2), 318-335. DOI : 10.1080/02681102.2016.1238816
  17. R. M. Ryan & E. L. Deci. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. DOI : 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  18. M. A. Halbinger. (2018). The role of makerspaces in supporting consumer innovation and diffusion: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 47(10), 2028-2036. DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.008
  19. S. S. Atakan, R. P. Bagozzi & C. Yoon. (2014). Make it your own: How process valence and self-construal affect evaluation of self-made products. Psychology & marketing, 31(6), 451-468. DOI : 10.1002/mar.20707
  20. C. Foster, M. Lande & S. Jordan. (2014). An ethos of sharing in the maker community. In Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and EXposition. Indianapolis, IN.
  21. D. Dougherty. (2012) The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11-14. DOI : 10.1162/INOV_a_00135
  22. K. Peppler & S. Bender. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22-27. DOI : 10.1177/003172171309500306
  23. A. F. Hayes. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press