디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권9호
  • /
  • Pages.31-37
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

노사분규 사업장 내 노동조합 조합원의 집단따돌림에 관한 탐색적 연구

An Exploratory Study on Group Bullying of Labor Union Members in Labor-Management Disputes

  • An, Sung-Eun (Department of Business Administration, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Yeon (Department of Business Administration, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Chae, Jun-Ho (Department of Business Administration, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.06.28
  • 심사 : 2019.09.20
  • 발행 : 2019.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구결과는 선행연구와 같이 피해자의 작업동기 상실, 조직 불신, 신경과민, 이직의도 증가, 좌절감, 스트레스와 감응저항, 무력감과 소외감을 나타냈다. 노동조합이라는 집단의 부정적인 힘에 눌려 일개 개인이 대항하거나 해결책을 찾을 수 없는 현실에 분노를 경험하였다. 또한 노조의 집단 따돌림에 대한 조합원의 두려움이라는 심리적 요인들이 파업에 합류하지 않은 노조원, 노조에 미가입한 근로자들에게 압력요소로 작용하여 기존 노동조합 노조원의 이탈을 방지하는데 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 노동조합의 집단따돌림 행동이 비록 집단의 목적을 달성하는데 효과가 있다고 하더라도 윤리적이어야 할 조직이 윤리적으로 벗어나는 모습을 보인다는 점에서 집단따돌림 행동이 타당한가에 대한 문제를 고려해 볼 필요가 있다.

The results of this study showed that victim's job motivation, organizational distrust, nervousness, turnover intention, frustration, stress and resistance, powerlessness and alienation were similar to previous studies. I was overwhelmed by the negative force of the collective union and experienced anger in the reality that one individual could not resist or find a solution. In addition, psychological factors such as union members' fear of union bullying were found to have a positive effect on the union members who did not join the strike and those who did not join the strike. It is necessary to consider the question of whether the group bullying behavior is valid in that the union bullying behavior of the union is effective in achieving the purpose of the group.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K K Park, H S Choi. (2007). A Study on Determinants and Outcomes of Mobbing at Workplace -investigation on mediating effect of Mobbing at Workplace. Koreanische Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 25(4), 43-70.
  2. Ozturk, H., Sokmen, S., Ylmaz, F., Cilingir, D. (2008). Measuring mobbing experiences of academic nurses: Development of a mobbing scale. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 20(9), 435-442. DOI : 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00347.x
  3. D. Kara. (2013). Workplace Mobbing and Effects on Female Employees Health and Safety Needs and Turnover Cognitions. Tourism analysis, 18(2), 215-220. DOI : 10.3727/108354213X13645733247891
  4. M. T. Nolen & J. R. Lucas. (2009). Asymmetries in mobbing behaviour and correlated intensity during predator mobbing by nuthatches, chickadees and titmice. Animal Behaviour, 77(5), 1137-1146. DOI : 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.023
  5. A. Kobelt, C. Gutenbrunner, G. Schmid-Ott, J. Schwickerath & F. Petermann. (2010). Do People With Mobbing Experience Which Apply for Medical Rehabilitation Have a Peculiar Personality?. PPMP, 60(7), 279-285. DOI : 10.1055/s-0029-1233497
  6. M. W. Campbell & C. T. Snowdon, (2009). Can Auditory Playback Condition Predator Mobbing in Captive-reared Saguinus oedipus?. International Journal of Primatology, 30(1), 93-102. DOI : 10.1007/s10764-008-9331-0
  7. M Griesser & T. N. Suzuki. (2017). Naive Juveniles Are More Likely to Become Breeders after Witnessing Predator Mobbing. The American naturalist, 189(1), 58-66. DOI : 10.1086/689477
  8. B. Hobbs. (2002). Bridge to the Future Tennessee Teachers Credit Union connects tradition with technology. Credit Union Management, 25(1), 54-55.
  9. N. Bartlett. (2008). Keeping Them Fresh: Rethinking must-have annual meetings can help your credit union make the most of them in terms of brand and member loyalty. Credit Union Management, 31(2), 50-53.
  10. L. Grensing-Pophal, (2010). Staffing Efficiencies: How credit unions can do more with less. Credit Union Management, 33(4), 36-41.
  11. S. A. Black & E. Jackson. (2007).Using Bullying Incident Density to Evaluate the Olweus Bullying Prevention Programme. School psychology international, 28(5), 623-638 DOI : 10.1177/0143034307085662
  12. K. L. Modecki, J. Minchin, A. G. Harbaugh, N. G. Guerra & K. C. Runions. (2014). Bullying Prevalence Across Contexts: A Meta-analysis Measuring Cyber and Traditional Bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602-611 DOI : 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007
  13. N. Drydakis (2019). School-Age Bullying, Workplace Bullying and Job Satisfaction: Experiences of LGB People in Britain. The Manchester School, 87(4), 455-488. DOI : 10.1111/manc.12257
  14. R. A. Bonanno & S. Hymel. (2013). Cyber Bullying and Internalizing Difficulties: Above and Beyond the Impact of Traditional Forms of Bullying. Journal of youth and adolescence, 42(5), 685-697. DOI : 10.1007/s10964-013-9937-1
  15. A. J. Speraw. (2009). No Bullying Allowed: A Call for a National Anti-Bullying Statute to Promote a Safer Learning Environment in American Public Schools. Val. UL Rev., 44(4), 1151-1198.