Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Authentic Leadership on Psychological Well-being and Job Performance - Focused on Airline Flight Attendants

진정성리더십이 심리적 웰빙과 직무성과에 미치는 영향 - 항공사 승무원을 중심으로

  • Ko, Seon-Hee (Department of Airline Service, Seowon University)
  • 고선희 (서원대학교 항공서비스학과)
  • Received : 2019.07.22
  • Accepted : 2019.09.20
  • Published : 2019.09.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study intends to examine how authentic leadership affects psychological well-being and job performance among flight attendants. To test hypotheses, this study performed survey to flight attendants of big airlines in Korea for about two months from October 1 to December 5, 2018. 200 copies of the questionnaire was distributed, and 180 were collected. Among them, 21 copies where many questions were unanswered or not very seriously answered were discarded. So, 159 copies in total were used for analysis. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS 22.0 and AMOS 21.0. The results are as follows. First, balanced information processing, self-awareness, self-awareness have significant effect on psychological well-being, while relational transparency have not. Second, psychological well-being have significant effect on job performance. Consequently, all the hypotheses in this study except for hypothesis 1-3 were adopted.

본 연구에서는 객실승무원이 지각하는 진정성리더십이 부하의 심리적 웰빙과 직무성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 논의하고자 한다. 가설을 검증하기 위하여 국내에 운항중인 대형항공사 객실승무원을 대상으로 2018년 10월 1일부터 12월 5일까지 약 2개월 간 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문지는 총 200부를 배포하여 180부가 회수 되었으며, 총159부를 실증분석에 이용하였다. 본 연구의 자료 통계분석은 SPSS 22.0과 AMOS 21.0을 이용하였다. 분석결과는 아래와 같다. 첫째, 진정성 리더십 중 균형적 정보처리, 자아인식, 내면화된 도덕관점은 심리적 웰빙에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 채택되었다. 반면 진정성리더십 중 관계적 투명성은 심리적 웰빙에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타나 기각되었다. 둘째, 항공사 승무원이 지각하는 심리적 웰빙은 직무성과에 유의한 영향을 미칠 것 이라는 유의한 경로계수를 보여 채택되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서 설정한 가설 중 가설 1-3을 제외한 나머지 가설은 모두 채택되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. B. Kim. (2018). Effects of Leadership, Organizational Justice and Psychological Empowerment on Job Performance. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(12), 265-272. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.12.265
  2. J. Burns. (1978). Leadership. NY: Harper & Row.
  3. B. M. Bass. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, New York, Free Press.
  4. B. J. Avolio & W. L. Gardner. (2005). Authentic Leadership Development: Getting to the Root of Positive Forms of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=O42786077 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
  5. F. O. Walumbwa, B. J. Avolio, W. L. Gardner, T. S. Wernisberg & S. J. Peterson. (2008) Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-based Measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
  6. F. Luthans & B. J. Avolio. (2003). Authentic Leadership: A Positive Development Approach. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.). Positive Organizational Scholarship. San Francisco, CA: Barrett-Koehler, 241-261.
  7. T. J. Leem, B. K. Kim & H. J. Choi. (2017). The Effect of Authentic Leadership on Relation Between Participative Budgeting and Budgetary Slack. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(11), 343-352. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.11.343
  8. J. Menard & L. Brunet. (2011). Authenticity and Well-being in the Workplace: A Mediation Model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(4), 331-346. DOI: 10.1108/02683941111124854
  9. R. M. Ryan & E. L. Deci. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potential: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaemonic Well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141-207. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
  10. M. E. P. Seligman. (2002). Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment, New York: Free Press.
  11. A. S. Waterman, S. J. Schwartz, B. L. Zamboanga, R. D. Ravert, M. K. Williams, B. Agocha, S. Y. Kim & M. B. Donnellan. (2010). The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric Properties, Demographic Comparisons, and Evidence of Validity. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(1), 41-61. DOI: 10.1080/17439760903435208
  12. C. D. Ryff & C. L. M. Keyes. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-746. MEDLINE(R)/PubMed(R) British Library https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
  13. J. M. Kang & J. O. Kwon. (2017). A Convergence Effect of Positive Psychological Capital and Psychological Well-being on Work Engagement of Medium and Small Hospitals Nurses. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(4), 89-99. DOI: 10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.4.089
  14. R. Ilies, F. P. Morgeson & J. D. Nahrgang. (2005). Authentic Leadership and Eudaimonic Well-Being: Understanding Leader-follower Outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 373-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002
  15. T. A. Wright & D. G. Bonett. (1997). The Role of Pleasantness and Activation-Based Well-Being in Performance Prediction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2(3), 212-221. DOI : 10.1037/1076-8998.2.3.212
  16. T. A. Wright, D. G. Bonett & D. A. Sweeney. (1993). Mental Health and Work Performance: Results of a longitudinal field study. Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 277-284. DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1993.tb00539.x
  17. R. P. Bagozzi & Y. Yi. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 16(1), 74-94. DOI : 10.1007/BF02723327
  18. C. Fornell & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. DOI: 10.2307/3151312