Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Development of Research Tool for Mathematics Teachers' Perceptions of Mathematics Education

수학교육에 대한 우리나라 교사의 인식조사를 위한 조사도구 개발

  • Received : 2019.07.05
  • Accepted : 2019.09.12
  • Published : 2019.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the second comprehensive mathematics education plan was announced in 2012, many policies have been implemented based on it. However, due to many changes in various social situations and revision of the curriculum, new plans and policy proposals for mathematics education are strongly required. But, we need to recognize what the changes in the current social and educational situation ask for education in order to make meaningful policy. Therefore, in this study, we intend to develop an appropriate questionnaire to investigate mathematics teachers' perceptions and educational status of mathematics by analyzing former domestic and international studies on the related field and reflecting the educational situation in Korea. When developing questions, experts' opinions were consulted and preliminary on-site survey studies were conducted to maintain the suitability and reliability of the questions. Through these procedure, 33 questions were developed in three areas: teachers' recognition on mathematics education, educational status of mathematics education, and ICT utilization. It will be used as a tool to investigate math teachers' perception and current status of mathematics education and the results from this survey will be useful for developing mathematics education policies for the future.

지난 2012년에 제2차 수학교육 종합계획이 발표된 이후 이를 바탕으로 하여 여러 가지 정책이 실현되고 있다. 하지만 여러 사회적인 변화 및 교육과정의 개정 등으로 인하여 새로운 수학교육 관련 계획 및 정책입안이 요구되고 있다. 유의미한 정책수립을 위해 현재 사회 및 교육현장의 변화가 교육에 요구하는 것이 무엇인지를 반영해야 한다. 따라서 지금까지 수학교육에 대한 교사들의 인식을 조사한 국내외 연구들에 대한 분석과 함께 여러 변화에 따른 요구와 현재 학교의 교육현황을 반영하여 학교 현장에서 교육을 수행하는 교사들에 대한 실질적 연구가 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 이를 조사할 수 있는 적절한 설문문항을 개발하고자 한다. 문항 개발시 전문가 의견 참조 및 현장 예비조사 연구를 실시하여 문항의 적절성과 신뢰도를 유지하였다. 이러한 과정을 통해서 수학교육인식, 수학교육현황, ICT활용의 3가지 부분의 33개의 문항을 개발했다. 개발된 문항은 현재 수학교사의 인식 및 교육 현황을 조사하는 도구로 활용될 것이며 또한 이 조사를 통해 나온 결과는 앞으로의 수학교육 관련 정책을 수립하는 데에 유용하게 쓰일 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, H. Y., Ko, E. S., Lee, D. H., Lee, H. Y., Tak, B. J., Cho, J. W. & Kim, S. H. (2018). A Study on Professional Development Program for Mathematics Teachers about Process-Focused Assessment, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 28(3), 321-343. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2018.08.28.3.321
  2. Ministry of Education (2015). The 2nd Comprehensive Plan for Mathematical Education, Press Release(2015.3.16.) Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=58701&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=C&page=144&s=moe&m=0201&opType=N
  3. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum(Modified in 2015)
  4. Kwon, K. Y. (2018). Education at the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Roles of Early Childhood Teachers, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(4), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.4.47
  5. Kwon, M. S. (2018). How should we teach?: Focused on application of process-oriented assessment in elementary mathematics, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(18), 873-896. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.18.873
  6. Kwean, H. J., Kim, M. K. & Lee, E. Y. (2006). Math Clinic for the Learning Disabilities, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 9(1), 19-40.
  7. Kim, G. Y. (2001). The Study for Spatial Change of Educational Conditions of Elementary Schools in Seoul, Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 13(3), 213-232.
  8. Kim, Y. J. (2014). A Study on the Structure Relation between Elementary School Teachers' Learning Community, Knowledge Sharing, and Job Performance, Graduate School, Ewha Women's University.
  9. Kim, H. A. &　Lee, B. J. (2016). Exploring the content factors to develop mathematics teachers' professionalism for creativity and character education, J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. A : The Mathematics Education, 55(4), 485-501.
  10. Kim, H. K. & Ko, H. K. (2018). A Case Study in Math Clinical Counseling base on Connection with Class, J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 32(2), 113-129.
  11. Kim, H. J. (2013). An effect of peer mentoring mathematics learning on academic achievement and learning attitude, Graduate School of Education, Kwangwon University.
  12. Ryu, T. H. (2017). 4th industrial revolution, Education is the hope. Kyung Hee University Press : Seoul
  13. Park, J. E. (2018). Consideration on Music and Education in the 4th Industrial Revolution, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(21), 1371-1385. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.21.1371
  14. Bae, K. J. & Park, M. K. (2016). An Analysis on the Peer Mentoring Effects on Students' Mathematical Character and Mathematics Achievements in Mathematics Lessons, J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. C : Education of Primary School Mathematics, 19(4), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2016.19.4.261
  15. Seong, T. J. (2017). Suggestions for the human character and education in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Korea Journal of Educational Research, 55(2), 1-21.
  16. Shin, E. J. & Park, K. (2018). The current status of and progressive operation measures for participation in professional learning communities by teachers of elementary, middle and high schools - With a focus on teachers registered with the Seoul Metropolitan Education Office, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(10), 415-443. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2018.18.10.415
  17. Yu, W. (2001). The Participants in The Policy Formulation Process of Elementary & Secondary School Curriculums, The Journal of Elementary Education Studies, 9(1), 91-107.
  18. Lee, K. H. (2010). A Study on the Case of Professional Learning Community in America and the Policy Implications to Korea, The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 27(4), 395-419.
  19. Lee, K. H. & Park, J. P. (2012). A Study on the Professional Learning Community for the School Innovation in Korea, The Journal of Politics of Education, 19(4), 133-153.
  20. Lee, K. H., Kang, H. Y., Ko, E. S., Lee, D. H., Shin, B. M., Lee, H. C. & Kim, S. H. (2016). Exploration of the Direction for the Practice of Process-Focused Assessment, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(4), 819-834.
  21. Lee, S. Y. (2019). Exploration of Museum Learning Environments for the Development of Creativity in the 4th Industrial Revolution Era, Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(3), 947-966. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.3.947
  22. Choi, Y. S. & Yoo, W. S. (2006). A Case Study of Students' Mentoring Activities for the Special-Supplementary Curriculum in Math Classrooms, J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 20(3), 483-502.
  23. Kofac (2016). 2016 Mathematics Data Book. Retrieved from https://www.askmath.re.kr/askmath/sub06/0005/?boardId=bbs_0000000000000013&mode=view&cntId=28
  24. Kofac (2019). 2018 Supporting the Professional Development School for Mathematics Education Final Report. Retrieved from https://www.askmath.re.kr/askmath/sub04/0002/?boardId=bbs_0000000000000004&mode=view&cntId=1742&category=&pageIdx=
  25. Kedi (2019). Education Statistics Analysis Data Sheet - Kindergarten.Elementary.Secondary Education Statistics(SM2017-06) Retrieved from https://www.kedi.re.kr/khome/main/research/selectPubForm.do?plNum0=11635&tPage=1&tabGb=0
  26. Kice (2016). Support Plan for Teaching and Learning of Underachiever in General High School - with the focus on Mathematics and English(RRI-2016-2). Retrieved from https://www.nkis.re.kr:4445/subject_view1.do?otpId=KICE00048835&otpSeq=228&popup=P
  27. Kice (2018). A Study on Linkage between Teaching & Learning and Evaluation for the Development of Capabilities - With the focus on Middle School Korean, History, Mathematics, Technology and home economics, Music(RRI 2018-5). Retrieved from https://www.nkis.re.kr:4445/subject_view1.do?otpId=OTP_0000000000001409&otpSeq=0&popup=P
  28. Brouwer, N. & Korthagen, F. (2005). Can Teacher Education Make a Difference?, American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 153-224. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042001153
  29. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (2010). Pan-Canadian Assessment Program, Main Administration Teacher Questionnaire. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/experience/survey_questionnaires.aspx
  30. Ingvarson, L., Beavis, A., Bishop, A. Peck, R. & Elsworth, G. (2004). Investigation of Effective Mathematics Teaching and Learning in Australian Secondary Schools, Australian Council for Educational Research, Canberra: Australia.
  31. Leatham, K. & Peterson, B. (2010). Secondary mathematics cooperating teachers' perceptions of the purpose of student teaching, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2). 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9125-0
  32. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2015). 2015 School Teacher Survey, Tokyo : Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
  33. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2017). NAEP Mathematics Teacher Questionnaire 2017 Grade 8, National Center for Educational Statistics, Washington. D.C. : NAEP.
  34. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Teaching and Learning International Survey 2013 Teacher Questionnaire, Paris : OECD Publishing.
  35. Zeinchner, K., Payne, K. A. & Bryako, K. (2015). Democratizing Teacher Education, Journal of teacher education, 66(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560908