참고문헌
- Bannister, V. R. P. (2014). Flexible conceptions of perspectives and representations: an examination of pre-service mathematics teachers' knowledge. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(3), 223-233.
- Despina, A. S. (2011). An examination of middle school students' representation practices in mathematical problem solving through the lens of expert work: towards an organizing scheme. Educational Studies Mathematics, 265-280.
- Dreyfus, T. & Vinner, S. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.2307/749441
- Dubinsky, E. & Harel, G. (1992). The nature of process of function. In E. Dubinsky, & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (MAA Notes No. 25, pp. 85-106). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
- Eisenberg, T. (1992). On the development of a sense for functions. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 153-174). Mathematical Association of America.
- Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)80063-7
- Friedlender, A. & Tabach, M. (2001). Promoting multiple representation in algebra, In A. A. Cuoco (Ed.), The roles of representation in school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Goldin, G. A. (1987). Cognitive representational systems for mathematical problem solving. In Claude Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 125-146). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hitt, F. (1998). Difficulties in the articulation of different representations linked to the concept of function. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)80064-9
- Hitt, F. & Gonzalez-Martin, A, S. (2015). Covariation between variables in a modelling process: The ACODESA(collaborative learning, scientific debate and self-reflection) method. Educational Studies Mathematics, 201-219.
- Janvier, C. (1987). Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Kleiner, I. (1989). Evolution of the function concept: A brief survey. College Mathematics Journal, 20, 282-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/07468342.1989.11973245
- Lamon, S. J. (2001). Presenting and representing: From fractions to rational numbers. In A. Cuoco (Ed.), The roles of representation in school mathematics. 2001 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 41-52). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In Claude Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Monk, G. S. (1988). Students' understanding of functions in calculus courses. Humanistic Mathematics Network Newsletter, 2.
- Moschkovich, J., Schoenfeld, A., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Aspects of understanding: On multiple perspectives and representations of linear relations and connections among them. In T. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. Carpenter (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of function (pp. 69-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Author.
- Romberg, T., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. (1993). Toward a common research perspective. In T. Romberg, E. Fennema & T. Carpenter (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Schnotz, W. & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8
- Selden, A. & Selden, J. (1992). Research perspectives on conceptions of fuction summary and overview. In E. Dubinsky, & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (MAA Notes No. 25, pp. 133-150). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
- Sfard, A. (1992). Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification-the case of function. In E. Dubinsky & G. Harel (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspect of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 59-84). Washington DC: MAA.
- Tall, D. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
- Yerushalmy, M. & Schwartz, J. (1993). Seizing the opportunity to make algebra mathematically and pedagogically interesting. In T. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. Carpenter (Eds.), Integrating research on the graphical representation of function (pp. 69-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Yerushalmy, M. & Swidan, O. (2012). Signifying the accumulation graph in dynamic and multi-representation environment. Educational Studies Mathematics, 80, 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9356-8